God's Master Race Making It Hard on God
The term "antisemitism" is being used to usher in the Satanic world of total Bolshevist rule
Since starting this publication seven months ago, I’ve written a lot on the subject of antisemitism. I’ve explained how persecution by the gentiles is a religious imperative in Judaism with or without any actual persecution. I’ve shown how young Jews, in the absence of actual persecution, are taught to feel “atmospheric antisemitism”—i.e., the persecution Jews suffer simply by living in a gentile society.1
I’ve explained how 19th Century Russian rabbis, in order to maintain their own grip on power, repackaged this perpetual Jewish victimhood and sold it as a murderous type of insanity that suddenly, without reason or warning, may seize all the gentiles in the area. They named their invention “antisemitism” and used it to frighten their congregations into resisting assimilation—rejecting the liberalizing efforts of Tsar Alexander II.
I’ve shown how, at the start of the 20th Century, the Russian intelligentsia adopted this Jewish way of seeing their own history and culture, and how that fatal mistake enabled the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and history’s worst genocide—the murder of 66 million Russian Christians. I’ve demonstrated that and many other parallels between pre-revolutionary Russia and the modern United States and offered ideas on ways to avoid the same fate—on what can save us.
I’ve demonstrated the method by which the Judaic view of ourselves was imposed on us. I’ve provided proof that the sociological phenomenon of antisemitism in the United States is a political fraud. I’ve exposed the totalitarian quality of the Biden Administration’s National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism and I’ve warned repeatedly of the sinister and disingenuous definition of antisemitism the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance is successfully imposing across the West.
The current deployment of the charge of antisemitism against those protesting the ongoing slaughter of the Palestinians illustrates what a fake phenomenon antisemitism is. If there were ever a legitimate reason to be protesting in the streets, the wholesale slaughter of civilians using bullets and bombs we paid for would seem to be it. But to Team Talmud, protestors are out there protesting because they hate Jews. Has nothing to with the obscenity occurring in our name in Gaza, you see. If it were Chinese or Brazilians or Nigerians or Norwegians shelling the Christian hospitals and civilian neighborhoods and refugee camps in Gaza, we’d all be on board with it, but because—and only because—these are Jews burying children alive in the rubble of their homes, we are protesting.
Here’s what everybody needs to understand: every viewpoint held on any subject by every human on the planet is really only a reflection of how that person feels about Jews. That’s what comes with being God’s Master Race.
Seriously, if Jewry were a single individual, he’d be declared a dangerous psychopath and locked away for the good of the community. But does a psychopath even know he’s a psychopath?
Elie Weisel wonders in his memoirs, “Why so many persecutions? So much oppression? What have we done wrong to men that they wish us so much ill?”
“Holocaust survivor,” Martin Gray, can’t understand it, either. “Why all this hatred against us,” he asks? Unable to to solve the puzzle, he throws up his hands and offers the only possible explanation: Jews live “in the midst of rabid, insane beasts.”2
Andre Glucksmann is another baffled Jew. “Hatred of the Jews is the enigma of enigmas,” he writes in Discourse on Hatred, “constantly reborn from the ashes of various fanaticisms which appear to motivate it… For the antisemite, the object of his aversion is like a UFO. He doesn’t know who or what he is talking about… the Jew is in no way the source of antisemitism…”
Daniel Goldhagen finds the whole thing perplexing, as well. The Holocaust is “the most difficult event to understand in all of German history,” he writes in Hitler’s Willing Executioners. “The Holocaust and the change in sensitivities which it implies defy explanation.”
And Rabbi Josy Eisenberg adds simply, “One cannot explain antisemitism.” It’s a real head scratcher. Like spontaneous combustion. One minute grandma is sitting there, the next minute you have a burned out hole in your couch. No explanation.
The above examples of puzzled Jews come from Understanding the Jews, Understanding Antisemitism by Hervé Ryssen. Ryssen went to prison for writing the book I got these examples from—for explaining antisemitism—when he was sued under French law by Jewish organizations.
If you advocate for and use laws against not liking you, then tell me you can’t understand why no one likes you, I’m going to suspect you are a bit thick. If you tell me you can’t explain antisemitism, then jail someone for explaining antisemitism, I’m going to know you are more than a bit deceitful.
Ryssen provides a 1958 quote from Primo Levi arguing we shouldn’t even try to understand Hitler’s antisemitism:
Perhaps because what happened has not been understood, and, even, should not be understood, in the sense that to understand is perhaps to justify… In the Nazi hatred there is nothing rational: it is a hatred which is not in us, which is foreign to man… We cannot understand it.34
And there you have it. The actuality of antisemitism isn’t phenomenal, it’s lingual. It’s a word that cloaks Jewish behavior.
From a November 4, 2023 NBC News piece, “Trump-era antisemitism policy expected to fuel flood of student lawsuits against universities”
In 2019, then-President Donald Trump signed an order instructing federal officials to expand the interpretation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include “discrimination rooted in anti-Semitism” as a form of discrimination based on race, color and national origin — prohibited behavior for programs that get federal funding…
Trump told federal agencies “to consider” using the Sweden-based International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism, which includes “holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel” and “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”
The IHRA’s definition also makes it an act of antisemitic discrimination to describe something Jews did as something Jews did.
Lawyers said they have received an overwhelming number of calls from across the country from Jewish college students and their parents requesting representation in Title VI claims. Kenneth Marcus, who ran the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights during the Trump and George W. Bush administrations, said he is getting many calls.
“Oh, my Gwawd, how many campuses we’re dealing with every single day I can’t tell you. So inundated with cases we have never been,” said Marcus, who now runs the Brandeis Center for Human Rights, a nonprofit group focused on protecting the civil rights of Jews.
Legal experts said they expect the largest number of future Title VI cases to be filed against universities by Jewish students.
Yeah, I’d say that prediction is as safe as a prediction that the ADL will announce antisemitism is on the rise.
The Anti-Defamation League recently reported that nationwide, “incidents of harassment, vandalism and assault increased by 388 percent over the same period last year.”
Georgetown Law student Julia Wax, 25, was also at the Columbia rally. Wax said she is in talks with Lawfare to file a Title VI lawsuit against her law school, claiming that pro-Palestinian student organizations on her campus have been publicly supporting Hamas.
In other words, people she disagrees with have turned her campus into an open forum where this conflict is being discussed.
“I think in a perfect world, Georgetown would create some sort of an open forum for this conflict to be discussed,” said Wax, adding that she wants Georgetown to adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism.
You know, an open forum where every view can be openly expressed except wrong ones, however true they may be, like this one: Israel is committing a crime against humanity in Gaza and we’re paying for it.
Jews have controlled the narrative in the United States for at least a century—and controlled it absolutely since about 1960. The Internet broke that stranglehold, offering American gentiles a chance to emerge from our degrading ignorance. As we slowly wake up, Team Talmud has been frantically trying to reestablish the information chokepoint and put us back to sleep.
Just as the Muslims today are paying a bloody and brutal price for our sleepy ignorance, we Christians, too, have paid a heavy price. From The Iron Curtain over America:
In 1937 and again in 1938 the German government made “a sincere effort to improve relations with the United States, only to be rebuffed.” The U.S. Government’s alleged reason was “a fear of domestic political reactions in this country unfavorable to the Administration.” Germany was told that the American public would not tolerate a conference. Some officials favored exploring the German offer “after the congressional elections in the fall” (1938). The sequel, of course, is that the Roosevelt administration blocked Germany’s further efforts for peace by withdrawing our ambassador from Berlin and thus peremptorily preventing future negotiations. Germany then had to recall her Ambassador “who was personally friendly toward Americans” and, according to the New York Times, “was known in diplomatic circles here at the time to be working for international understanding in a spirit of good will.” Here, to repeat for emphasis, is the crux of the matter: The whole story of Germany’s appeal for negotiations and our curt refusal and severance of diplomatic relations was not published in 1937 or 1938, when Germany made her appeals, but was withheld from the public until ferreted out by the House Committee on Un-American Activities after World War II and by that committee released to the press more than ten years after the facts were so criminally suppressed.5
In 1916, just before falling into the abyss, there were complaints in Russia about Jewish dominance of the Russian press. “That the press is controlled by the government is an evil,” said one member of the Russian Duma, their Congress, “but there is an even greater evil: that the press is controlled by the enemies of the Russian State!”6
The sole function of the term “antisemitism” is to give the enemies of humanity control over our political conversation—on campus, on the newsstand, on the air, on the floors of the Senate and House, and online.
All laws suppressing “antisemitism” must be wiped off the books; the word “antisemitism” itself should only be used when mocking it.
In this aspect, antisemitism is like “systemic racism,” itself a product of Jewish intellectual effort.
For Those I Loved, by Martin Gray, 1972, A “true” story of survival during the Holocaust and the basis, but of course, of a 1983 movie with Michael York. Martin Gray later blamed all the falsehoods exposed in his book on his “ghost writer.”
If This Is a Man by Primo Levi, 1958
That kind of hatred may be foreign to man, but it certainly wasn’t foreign to Leon Trotsky:
We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. …We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence... At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia — officers, academics and writers!...
The Iron Curtain over America, by John Beaty, 1954 (fourth printing)
Stenographic Record of the Debates of the Fourth Duma, February 1916, pp. 1453 1454, 2477.
After this current atrocity in Gaza, the Zionists will no longer get sympathy when invoking the "Holocaust"; they've shot themselves in the foot.
Another great article. Thank you.