The Khazars
If you call out these non-Semites for their abuse of the native Semites of Palestine, they will call you an anti-Semite. Even crazier, we are helping them ethnically-cleanse Ukraine of Christians
NOTE
Since I wrote this piece, I have adjusted my thinking on the subject of the Khazars thanks to reader, .
About 600 A.D., a thousand miles north of where Muhammad was establishing a new religion, “a Belligerent tribe of half-Mongolian people, similar to the modern Turks, conquered the territory of what is now Southern Russia. Before long the kingdom [khanate] of the Khazars, as this tribe was known, stretched from the Caspian to the Black Sea.”1 Roughly 150 years later, with the new Muhammaden faith expanding rapidly in the south, and the Christian Byzantine Empire looming to the west, a khakan, or Khazar tribal chieftain, named Bulan “called upon the representatives of Judaism, Christianity and Mohammedanism to expound their doctrines before him. This discussion convinced him that the Jewish faith was the most preferable, and he decided to embrace it. Thereupon he and about 4,000 Khazars were circumcised [!]; it was only by degrees that the Jewish teachings gained a foothold among the population.”2
Quoting from The Iron Curtain over America:
A successor of Bulan, who bore the Hebrew name of Obadiah, was the first to make serious efforts to further the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish sages to settle in his dominions, rewarded them royally, founded synagogues and schools … caused instruction to be given to himself and his people in the Bible and the Talmud, and introduced a divine service modeled on the ancient communities.3
The area north of Khazaria had long been inhabited by various Slavic tribes. During the Middle Ages, Viking warriors pushed down from the Baltics and settled as far east as Nizhni-Novgorod. These immigrants from the North and West were principally “the ‘Rus’ — a Varangian tribe in ancient annals considered as related to the Swedes, Angles, and Northmen.”4 Around 862, before being absorbed into them, the Rus organized the local Slavic tribes into a state, which extended all the way south to the Black Sea and the Crimea, and gave it the name Russia.
The Rus and the Slavs were racially related and their languages had a common Indo-Germanic origin. They accepted Christianity as their religion. “Greek Orthodox missionaries, sent to Russ in the 860′ s baptized so many people that shortly after this a special bishop was sent to care for their needs.”5
From The Iron Curtain over America:
The Slavs, especially those in the area now known as the Ukraine, were engaged in almost constant warfare with the Khazars and finally, by 1016 A.D., destroyed the Khazar government and took a large portion of Khazar territory…. Some of the subjugated Khazars remained in the Slav-held lands their khakans had long ruled, and others “migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia,”6 probably to a considerable extent because of the dislocations wrought by the Mongols under Genghis Khan (1162-1227), who founded in and beyond the old Khazar khanate the short-lived khanate of the Golden Horde. The Judaized Khazars underwent further dispersion both northwestward into Lithuanian and Polish areas and also within Russia proper and the Ukraine. In 1240 in Kiev “the Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members finding refuge in towns further west”7 along with the fleeing Russians, when the capital fell to the Mongol soldiers of Batu, the nephew of Genghis Khan. A short time later many of these expelled Jews returned to Kiev. Migrating thus, as some local power impelled them, the Khazar Jews became widely distributed in Western Russia….
Relations between Slavs and the Judaized Khazars in their midst were never happy. The reasons were not racial — for the Slavs had absorbed many minorities — but were ideological. The rabbis sent for by Khakan Obadiah were educated in and were zealots for the Babylonian Talmud, which after long labors by many hands had been completed on December 2, 499. In the thousands of synagogues which were built in the Khazar khanate, the imported rabbis and their successors were in complete control of the political, social, and religious thought of their people.
It was to maintain that absolute control that the rabbis invented the ghetto, locked the “destructive creed” around their people, and resisted all efforts to emancipate or assimilate the Khazars. Eventually, these Khazars came to be known as the “Russian Jews” or “Eastern Jews.” Western Jews during this time were only vaguely aware of these “Eastern Jews” and the West itself would remain blissfully and utterly ignorant of their existence for centuries yet. Today, we refer to them generally as Ashkenazim. It is they who “returned” to Israel, even though no ancient Khazar ancestor ever came within a thousand kilometers of Palestine.
After the fall of Kiev, the Russian capital was moved to Moscow and a long period of disorder set in. In 1613, desiring stability, the Russian nobles elected as their czar a boy, Michael Romanov, in whose veins ran the blood of the grand dukes of both Kiev and Moscow. The Romanov dynasty lasted three centuries until a summer night in 1917 when Khazars murdered the Tsar, his wife, four daughters, and ten-year-old son in the basement of a farmhouse. Relations between the Eastern Jews and the Russian Christian majority amongst whom they lived were always antagonistic.
Attendance at the meetings of the Christian-Jewish Comity Club was only slightly better in Western Europe. Spain expelled its Jews in 1492 and dispersed them throughout Europe, from which there arose a steady chorus of complaints against them.
In 1804, Napoleon was crowned emperor of France. Quoting from The Controversy of Zion:
Very soon after [Napoleon] became Emperor (or possibly even before) he found that one of the most difficult problems which would confront him was not a French affair at all but an alien one: “the Jewish question!” It had racked the lives of the people for centuries; no sooner was the Pope persuaded, and the imperial crown on Napoleon’s head, than it popped up from behind Napoleon’s throne, to harass him.
In Napoleonic manner he took it by the throat and tried to extract an answer from it to the eternal question: did the Jews truly desire to become part of the nation and to live by its law, or did they secretly acknowledge another law which commanded them to destroy and dominate the peoples among whom they dwelt?
…by 1806 “the Jewish question” was so large among [Napoleon’s] cares that he … summoned 112 leading representatives of Judaism, from France, Germany and Italy, to come to Paris and answer a list of questions.
Napoleon’s questions went, like arrows to a target, straight to the tenets of the Torah-Talmud on which the wall between the Jews and other men had been built. The chief ones were, did the Jewish Law permit mixed marriages; did the Jews regard Frenchmen as “strangers” (foreigners) or as brothers; did they regard France as their native country, the laws of which they were bound to obey; did the Judaic Law draw any distinction between Jewish and Christian debtors?
The Jewish delegates ardently affirmed that there was no longer any such thing as a Jewish nation; that they did not desire to live in closed, self-governed communities; that they were in every respect Frenchmen and nothing more. They hedged only on the point of mixed marriages; these, they said, were permissible “under the civil law.”
In all the nations of the West, Jews were granted full civil liberties in the years that followed.
Thenceforth Orthodox Judaism, with the face it turned toward the West, denied any suggestion that the Jews would form a nation within nations. Reform Judaism in time “eliminated every prayer expressing so much as even the suspicion of a hope or a desire for any form of Jewish national resurrection” (Rabbi Moses P. Jacobson).
Within one hundred eleven years, events proved that the real power in Jewry never for a moment renounced Jewish nationalism. But among the mass of “little Jews,” for whom humanity always beckons, there was real assimilation in keeping with the spirit of the times. These Jews comprised the first wave of Jewish immigration to the United States.
By 1877, there were about 280,000 Jews in the United States. These were Western Jews, mostly Sephardic8 and German. Then came the wave of Eastern Jews. The total number of legally recorded immigrants from Russia, most of them Jews, between 1881 and 1920 was 3,237,079.9 The Western Jews were not numerous enough to contribute “cultural guidance” to the huge wave of Eastern Jews that arrived in the last decades of the 19th Century and the first decades of the 20th.10
From The Iron Curtain over America:
Thus by sheer weight of numbers, as well as by aggressiveness, the newcomer Jews from Eastern Europe pushed into the background the more or less Westernized Jews, who had migrated or whose ancestors had migrated to America prior to 1880 and had become for the most part popular and successful merchants with no inordinate interest in politics. In striking contrast, the Eastern European Jew made himself “a power to be reckoned with in the professions, the industries, and the political parties.”11
“Most of these first 200,000 came from Germany. They integrated themselves completely.”12 This integration was not difficult. Western Jews in the 19th Century not only had no racial or ethnic connection with the Khazars, but were not separatists or Jewish nationalists. The old contentions of their ancestors with their Christian neighbors in Western Europe had been largely overlooked on both sides. The Khazars were (and are) animated by a much deeper hatred, a hatred born in subjugation to a Christian conqueror—the “wretched fate” that scattered them amongst us—a hatred nourished for a thousand years in the closed, autocratic societies of the Talmudic rabbinate.
After 1880 and “particularly in the first two decades of the twentieth century, immigration to the United States from Eastern Europe increased rapidly.” Soon these newcomers of nationalist persuasion actually exerted influence over the old and once anti-nationalist organization of American Reform Judaism. “In the winter of 1941-42 the Central Conference of American Rabbis had endorsed the campaign to organize a Jewish Army. The event indicated the capitulation of the leadership of Reform Judaism to Jewish Nationalism.” Many American-minded Jews protested, but “the voices were disorganized [you know, like Americans] and therefore could be safely ignored.” American Jewry “had succumbed to the relentless pressure of the Zionist.”13
So we see there were two distinct populations of American Jews. Initially, there was a great deal of hostility between these two groups. For example, it was Western Jews who refused Eastern Jews memberships in their country clubs. But influential Hollywood historians like Caddyshack replaced the Western Jews with evil WASPS, subtly bringing modern Jews into alliance with the Khazars against a common enemy—white Christians.
Another example of how the Eastern Jew/Western Jew distinction was at one time apparent in the United States is illustrated by the case of Leo Frank, a wealthy Brooklyn Jew convicted in the 1913 rape and murder of a 13-year-old, poor, white Christian girl employed in his Atlanta pencil factory. When Frank’s death sentence was commuted by the outgoing governor of Georgia, outraged Georgians abducted Frank from prison and lynched him, making him the one and only Jewish lynching victim in US history.
Of course, despite Frank being the lone Jewish lynching victim in a country that has seen thousands of extrajudicial lynchings of both blacks and whites, his lynching is routinely described as a product of the antisemitism with which the South allegedly seethed in 1915. Frankly, with a grand total of one victim, antisemitism seems an especially limp kind of hatred. Or, maybe, the whole antisemitism thing is just another hoax like Jewish skin lampshades and the larger black turnout for Biden in 2020 than for Obama in 2008.
From history.com:
Thirty-one-year-old Leo Frank, a Jewish factory superintendent, was kidnapped from prison in Atlanta, Georgia and lynched by an antisemitic mob on August 17, 1915.
From encyclopedia.com:
The prosecution and conviction of Leo Frank in 1913, and his murder by a lynch mob two years later, constitute the South 's most notorious episode of anti-Semitism…
From PBS:
But when the governor of Georgia commuted Frank’s sentence in 1915 to life in prison, an outraged mob…lynched him…[l]aying bare the disturbing reality of antisemitism and antisemitic conspiracies in America….
In a devastating take-down of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which got its start as a fund-raising vehicle for Leo Frank’s legal defense, Ron Unz takes a close look at the Leo Frank case. (After reading his article, it’s clear to me Leo Frank was guilty as charged.) From the Unz Review:
As the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, Frank ranked as one of the most prominent Jewish men in the South, and great resources were deployed in his legal defense, but after the longest and most expensive trial in state history, he was quickly convicted and sentenced to death.
Donations from Jewish sources poured in.
Currency conversions are hardly precise, but relative to the American family incomes of the time, the total expenditures by Frank supporters may have been as high as $25 million in present-day dollars, quite possibly more than any other homicide defense in American history before or after, and an almost unimaginable sum for the impoverished Deep South of that period. Years later, a leading donor privately admitted that much of this money was spent on perjury and similar falsifications, something which is very readily apparent to anyone who closely studies the case. When we consider this vast ocean of pro-Frank funding and the sordid means for which it was often deployed, the details of the case become far less mysterious. There exists a mountain of demonstrably fabricated evidence and false testimony in favor of Frank, and no sign of anything similar on the other side.
But by totally distorting the Frank case and focusing such massive national media coverage on his plight, Jewish leaders around the country succeeded in fabricating a powerful ideological narrative despite its lack of reality, perhaps intending the story to serve as a bonding experience to foster Jewish community cohesion.
Yes, foster Jewish community cohesion, which is also served by perpetuating the antisemitism fraud. The Khazars have usurped Judaism itself.
The man who led the effort to save Frank was a Jewish businessman from Chicago named Albert Lasker. Here’s how his efforts on behalf of Leo Frank were remembered in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, in 2016:
Perhaps the only significant Lasker campaign that failed was his all-out and honest effort to prove to the Georgia legal system that Leo Frank, the Jewish manager of an Atlanta pencil factory, had not murdered a young female employee, and that the charges against him were trumped-up and based on anti-Semitism. Notwithstanding the accused man’s innocence, and Lasker’s sophisticated campaign on his behalf, Frank was dead before justice could run its full course, having been kidnapped from his jail cell and lynched by members of the Ku Klux Klan.
Honest effort? Yeah, about that “honest effort”…
From Unz:
Ironically enough, Lasker himself plunged into this crusade despite apparently having very mixed personal feelings about the man whose cause he was championing. His later biography reveals that upon his first personal meeting with Frank, he perceived him as “a pervert” and a “disgusting” individual, so much so that he even hoped that after he managed to free Frank, the latter would quickly perish in some accident. Furthermore, in his private correspondence he freely admitted that a large fraction of the massive funding that he and numerous other wealthy Jews from across the country were providing had been spent on perjured testimony and there are also strong hints that he explored bribing various judges. Given these facts, Lasker and Frank’s other major backers were clearly guilty of serious felonies, and could have received lengthy prison terms for their illegal conduct.
The dominance of Eastern Jews in America and among American Jews means the vast majority of Americans—Jew and gentile—believe the lie that Leo Frank was an innocent victim of white antisemitism.
But Western Jews weren’t entirely absent from the Leo Frank story. The Jewish community in Atlanta had been a respected and successful part of the city for generations already the day Leo Frank raped and murdered a little girl who had come to collect her $1.20 paycheck. It was from this community that five of the 21 grand jurors were drawn who comprised the grand jury that voted to indict Leo Frank for murder. All five voted to indict. None of the five ever publicly expressed any regret about their vote.
I wonder whether you descendants of those five “American-minded” Jews believe your ancestors voted to indict Frank out of Jew-hatred? No? Then what gives you the right to assume my ancestors did?
A History of the Jews, Solomon Grayzel, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947
Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. VI, pp. 375-377)
History of the Jews, Professor H. Graetz, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Vol. Ill, 1894, pp.140-141),
Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. XIX, p. 712
A History of the Ukraine, by Michael Hrushevsky, Yale University Press, 1941, p. 65
Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, p. 377
Ibid, p. 382
Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1934, p. 2281
Graetz-Raisin, Vol. VI, Chapter IV, “American Continent,” A “The Sephardic and German Periods,” B “The Russian Period”
The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 817
Graetz-Raisin, op. cit, Vol. VI, p. 344
The Jewish Dilemma, Elmer Berger, The Devin-Adair Company, New York, 1945 p. 232
Ibid., p. 245
“The Khazars have usurped Judaism itself”.
I rest my case that it has nothing to do with some imaginary marching orders from Deuteronomy, but that it is entirely of the machinations of The Synagogue of Satan and the Tares Among Wheat.
I just sat down and read Deuteronomy yesterday and today, and in the entirety of the book itself, and in the greater context of the old & New Testaments, you cannot make the argument that God has given his Chosen representatives marching orders to subdue the world. Christ himself will subdue the world and rule them with a rod of iron, after humanity reaps what it has sown in immorality and idolatry.
Volodymyr Zelensky is an Israeli operative, the Ukrainian parliament is full of Jewish apparatchiks.
Ukraine’s Azov Regiment Visits Israel: ‘Mariupol is our Masada’ . . .
https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/12/ukraines-azov-regiment-visits-israel-mariupol-is-our-masada/