Diversity Is the Executioners' Strength
One way the Bolsheviks subdued the Russian people was by giving roving gangs of non-Russians—primarily Chinese, Koreans, Latvians, and Jews—free rein to kill and plunder the local Christians.
It was hard to watch recent scenes of African migrants disembarking unopposed onto the beaches of Europe even as France was burning and nearly at civil war with the predecessors of those pouring ashore. The corrupt Western leadership describes the endless boatloads of migrants crossing the Mediterranean and illegally entering Europe (or arriving in caravans at our own southern border) as a humanitarian crisis. To the rest of the world, it looks like an invasion. The reason it looks like we are being conquered is because we are being conquered. And the conquerors know it. As a headline in The Daily Maverick, a South African publication, put it, “African migrants – payback time for Europe?”
To judge by conversations online regarding the migrant invasion of the West, there are many around the world cheering it on. The West, in their view, has meant nothing but racism, oppression, exploitation, colonization, aggression, and misery to the rest of the world and so the destruction of the West through foreign invasion is cause for celebration. Remarkably, many in the West agree. Indeed, that view itself is arguably a Western export—a product of the anti-Western media embedded in the United States and transmitted worldwide primarily through the powerful medium of film.
The West has adopted a destructive ideology that mirrors the destructive ideology adopted by the Russians in the lead-up to the revolutions of 1917. The source of that destructive ideology was Jewish, according to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. He claimed that the Jewish view of Russian history as a history of oppression, exploitation, and anti-Semitism had become the Russian view of themselves—particularly among the Russian intelligentsia. In order for Russia to escape that history, so the ideology ran, the old oppressive Tsarist Russia had to be swept away, “torn out by the roots,” and a new Russia built on the ruins of the old. The result was history’s bloodiest genocide—the murder, under Jewish direction, of 66 million Russian Christians—and the massive, violent dispossession of the Russian people.
Similarly, Westerners today view their own history and culture through Jewish eyes. From Professor Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique:
By all accounts, ethnic Jews have a powerful influence in the American media—far larger than any other identifiable group. The extent of Jewish ownership and influence on the popular media in the United States is remarkable given the relatively small proportion of the population that is Jewish.1 In a survey performed in the 1980s, 60 percent of a representative sample of the movie elite were of Jewish background (Powers et al. 1996, 79n13).2
As many academics have pointed out, the media have become more and more important in creating culture (e.g., Powers et al. 1996, 2). Before the 20th century, the main creators of culture were the religious, military, and business institutions. In the course of the 20th century these institutions became less important while the media have increased in importance (for an account of this transformation in the military, see Bendersky 2000).3 And there is little doubt that the media attempt to shape the attitudes and opinions of the audience (Powers et al. 1996, 2–3).
Part of the continuing culture of critique is that the media elite tend to be very critical of Western culture. Western civilization is portrayed as a failing, dying culture, but at worst it is presented as sick and evil compared to other cultures (Powers et al. 1996, 211). [And this has become, since 1996, explicitly anti-white.] These views were common in Hollywood long before the cultural revolution of the 1960s, but they were not often expressed in the media because of the influence of non-Jewish cultural conservatives.
Perhaps the most important issue Jews and Jewish organizations have championed is cultural pluralism—the idea that the United States ought not to be ethnically and culturally homogeneous. As described in Culture of Critique, Jewish organizations and Jewish intellectual movements have championed cultural pluralism in many ways, especially as powerful and effective advocates of an open immigration policy. The media have supported this perspective by portraying cultural pluralism almost exclusively in positive terms—that cultural pluralism is easily achieved and is morally superior to a homogeneous Christian culture made up mainly of white non-Jews. Characters who oppose cultural pluralism are portrayed as stupid and bigoted (Lichter et al. 1994, 251),4 the classic being the Archie Bunker character in Norman Lear’s All in the Family television series. Departures from racial and ethnic harmony are portrayed as entirely the result of white racism (Powers et al. 1996, 173).
The destructive ideology that informs the Western view of itself portrays the West, insofar as it is the creation of the white race, as devoid of value. There is nothing about Western Civilization worth preserving. Any argument that Western Civilization has any redeeming quality at all, let alone that whites might have the same right to a homeland as everyone else, is immediately denounced as “white supremacy.” The world will be a better place, according to the destructive ideology, when the West and the whiteness that is its source are destroyed.
The popular culture instills the destructive ideology from birth in every American and, thanks to the enormous reach of American pop culture, in every Westerner, and, in fact, to some degree, in every human on the planet.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, looking back over the horror of what Russia endured during the 20th Century and lamenting Russians waking 25 years too late, wrote that “under the notion of equality of rights, the Jews understood something more.” The same might be said about the notion of cultural pluralism. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), for example, while defining the term “Judeo-Bolshevism” as an “anti-Semitic canard,” is simultaneously a fierce opponent of efforts to restrict mass immigration and a relentless advocate for “dismantling white supremacy.”
Within the first year of taking power in Russia, the Bolshevik regime threw the gates open to foreigners. On April 5, 1918, a decree was issued for the free naturalization of aliens. On June 9, a right of asylum was established for all aliens persecuted in their native countries on account of their political or religious convictions.5 Persecution could be assumed, of course, for the large number of Jews who arrived from America, where anti-Semitism has been reported on the rise every year since 1890. Chinese, too, arrived in large numbers, as did sizeable numbers of Latvians and Koreans. From all directions they came, eager to help sweep away the old Russia—or at least carry away those parts with any kind of resale value.
The following is from a 1919 collection of reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Notice the use made of “diversity:”
No. 16.
Mr. Alston to Mr. Balfour (received January 4)
Vladivostock, January 2, 1919
All officers were ordered in July to report to Alexandrovsky School to be registerd. About 20,000 appeared, and were shut up for three days without air, food, or sleep. Many went mad, and Chinese and Lettish guard mercilessly bayonetted those who attempted to escape when they were finally let out.
Residents in area around Butirsky prison abandoned their houses owing to the numerous executions of “counter-revolutionary intellectuals.”
No. 20.
General Poole to War Office:— (received January 9)
January 8, 1919
The Bolsheviks are now employing gangs of Chinese for the purpose of killing officers and deserters. Peasants have been killed by these gangs for refusing to comply with requisitioning decrees, and even the families of officers serving here have been murdered. The above is based on authentic information.
No. 25.
Colonel Wade to British Peace Conference Commission, Paris, and Foreign Office.
Warsaw, January 19, 1919.
Number of Korean and Chinese units is reported to be increasing by persons arriving from Ukraine and Soviet Russia. Sole object of these units is plunder, as they are merely bandits and not a regular army. Gravity of situation created by this new development cannot be sufficiently emphasized.
No. 26.
Mr. Alston to Earl Curzon.—(Received January 25)
Vladivostock, January 23, 1919
FOLLOWING from High Commissioner:—
“Following statements respecting Bolsheviks in Perm and neighbourhood are taken from reports sent by His Majesty’s consul at Ekaterinburg. The Omsk Government have similar information:—
The Bolsheviks can no longer be described as a political party holding extreme communistic view. They form relatively small privileged class which is able to terrorise the rest of the population because it has a monopoly both of arms and of food supplies. This class consists chiefly of workmen and soldiers, and included a large non-Russian element, such as Letts and Esthonians and Jews; the latter are specially numerous in higher posts. Members of this class are allowed complete licence, and commit crime against other sections of society…
“The peasantry suffered less, but were forbidden under pain of death to sell food to any but Bolsheviks.
“The churches were closed, for many priests were killed, and a bishop was buried alive.
“This and other barbarous punishments, such as dipping people in rivers till they were frozen to death. Those condemned to be shot were led out several times and fired at with blank cartridges, never knowing when the real execution would take place. Many other atrocities are reported.
“The Bolsheviks apparently were guilty of wholesale murder in Perm, and it is certain that they had begun to operate a plan of systematic extermination. On a lamp above a building were the words: ‘Only those who fight shall eat.’”
No. 27.
Lord Kilmarnock to Earl Curzon:— (Received February 1)
Copenhagen, January 21, 1919
The Chinese guard in Petrograd numbered about 5,000, and discipline in the Red Army was severer than ever before and executions as numerous.
No. 37.
Notes on interviews with Mr. C and Mr. D February 13, 1919
No more satisfied are the soldiers. In fact the only troops the Bolsheviks can trust are the Lettish and the Chinese and a few battalions of sailors. They give them 250 roubles per month, all found, together with gold watches and chains requisitioned from the bourgeoisie… For any military offense, there is only one punishment—death. Executions are done mostly by the Chinese….
No. 58.
Progress of Bolshevism in Russia, Memorandum by Mr. B_____.
…Each soldier receives 300 to 500 roubles per month, equipment, food on a higher scale than all the other categories, and a promise to support his family in the event of death; but, in spite of their privileged situation, the Red Guard have not the confidence of the Government, and, as intercepted letters show, many of them are disaffected. The real reliance of the Government is placed in the “International Battalions of the Army,” which are formed of Letts and Chinese, who are used as punitive companies both in the Army and the interior. Theoretically, the International battalions are on an equality with the Red Guard, but actually they are far better paid, and they can count on absolute immunity for the excesses they commit against the wretched civil population which is left at their mercy.
Report by Mr. G. ______, who left Petrograd in November 1918
The impartial reader of the Bolshevist press, and it must be taken into consideration that there does not exist any press with the exception of the official one now in Russia, can read in these official papers every day articles and information about local revolts which happen daily in various parts of the country, mostly villages where the peasants rise in an entirely unorganized way against the power of the Soviet. In the second part of November such revolts have taken place in nearly all the districts of the Government of Moscow, and were suppressed mercilessly by the Red Army, composed to a considerable extent of Chinese and Letts.
As Solzhenitsyn noted,
Let us remember: just as, before the revolution, the revolutionaries and liberal radicals had been quick to exploit for political purposes—and not for charity—the restrictions imposed on Jews, likewise, in the months and years that followed October, the Bolsheviks, with the utmost complaisance, used the Jews within the State apparatus and the Party, too, not because of sympathy, but because they found their interest in the competence, intelligence and the particularism of the Jews towards the Russian population. On the spot they used Latvians, Hungarians, Chinese: these were not going to be sentimental...6 [emphasis added]
In other words, it’s easier to murder innocent people if they are not your people.
If America is on the same track Russia was in the first years of the 20th Century, and it certainly appears that it is, then it’s certain non-whites will be weaponized against the white majority here just as non-Russians were against the Russians. Sound far-fetched? Consider President Biden’s recent commencement address to the graduating class at the premiere HBCU in the country, Howard University, in Washington, DC. From USAToday, May 14, 2023:
President Joe Biden rebuked white supremacy in his commencement address to graduates of Howard University on Saturday, where he called it a “poison” and the most “dangerous terrorist threat” to the country.
“On the best days, enough of us have the guts and the heart to stand up for the best in us,” Biden said. “To stand up against the poison of white supremacy … to single it out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland.”
Pure blood libel.
Where is all this “white supremacy” we keep hearing about, Mr. President? How can we spot this poisonous whiteness? According to the destructive ideology of your handlers, this country was founded on white supremacy and has always been awash in white supremacy. And now that same white supremacy is the most dangerous terrorist threat to that same country? It’s nonsense and you know it, Mr. President, and if you had an ounce of dignity you would die of shame for uttering this blood libel against your own people in servile obedience to people who hate us and all humanity.
“White supremacist” is the new “enemy of the people”—a meaningless gibberish name that can be whipped out and applied to anyone. “White supremacy” is exactly like “anti-Semitism”—an imaginary evil that permeates everything. It is literally the product of a religious psychosis.
Every people has a fundamental right to protect itself against genocide. The perpetrators of the worst genocide in world history have hidden that genocide from us. This flagrant holocaust denial leaves us defenseless against a repeat—the vast majority of us unable to recognize the approach of the next genocide, or even to perceive that President Biden and the mass media are clearly—so very obviously—seeking to turn blacks into a weapon against whites.7
Remember and propagate the Magic Fact: When the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia in 1917, they razed thousands of churches, but left the synagogues untouched. Then they murdered 66 million Russian Christians.
Subscribers see the same posts paid subscribers do. However, paid subscribers also have access to a private chat, which they can reach by clicking on the “chat” tab above. Free subscribers can earn complimentary subscriptions through referrals. Just click on the “leaderboard” tab above to get your unique link. Either way, free or paid, thank you for supporting my work.
Discussions of Jewish ownership of the media include: Ginsberg 1993, 1; Kotkin 1993, 61; Silberman 1985, 147.
Powers, S., Rothman, D. J., & Rothman, S. (1996). Hollywood’s America: Social and Political Themes in Motion Pictures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bendersky, J. (2000). The “Jewish Threat”. New York: Basic Books
Lichter, S. R., Lichter, L. S., & Rothman, S. (1994). Prime Time: How TV Portrays American Culture. Washington, DC: Regnery
It is helpful to remember that we all have been subjected to a lifetime of propaganda instilling the destructive ideology. (This includes family members and friends, so don’t sever ties with the people in your life over political disagreements.) It isn’t only whites who have been force-fed the destructive anti-Western ideology, the members of other races and ethnicities—including Jews—have been, too.