Imagine Wanting To Use the Power of the State To Punish Your Neighbor for Not Liking You
And then blaming them for not liking you
There are consequences to worshiping a pathological god. And, as gods go, they don’t come any more pathological than the bloodthirsty, wilderness slaughter-god, Jehovah.
Jews think it’s okay to slaughter innocent civilians and commit genocide because “god” gave them their land. Christians, who also inexplicably worship the Jewish slaughter-god, think that if they help the Jews slaughter innocent children, Jesus is going to come scoop them up into the clouds and reward them by “letting” them worship the slaughter-god for eternity.
Sick, no?
Jews are psychopaths. Christians are psychopaths. But Jews, at least, get to keep the land of the people they are slaughtering. Christians get their reward after they die. <wink> <wink> So Christians are stupid psychopaths.
How’s this for Christian stupidity:
Representative Mike Lawler, the chinless Catholic who represents the exurbs of New York City, has already re-introduced in the new Congress the bill he introduced in the last Congress that gives the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)’s “non-legally binding working definition” of antisemitism the force of law in the United States. (As always, the whole “non-legally binding” thing is pure deception. Unfortunately, Christians are apparently just too stupid to grasp that.)
On the IHRA website, it reads:
The Holocaust is eminently relevant to the present day. A well-informed understanding of the Holocaust, the paradigmatic genocide, can help in comprehending and addressing other genocides, mass atrocities, and human rights violations.
Seriously—the paradigmatic genocide.
The IHRA claims to have a “well-informed understanding” of the genocide of Jews by Nazis in WWII and provides extensive educational materials on such to children and policymakers around the world, but how well has that understanding helped the IHRA in “comprehending and addressing other genocides?” A search on the word “Nazi” on its website returns 53 pages of results, but a search on the word “Bolshevik” returns nothing.
The Bolshevik genocide of Russian gentiles began 16 years before Hitler came to power in Germany, didn't even slow down during WWII, and continued 42 years after Germany surrendered. But even though that holocaust dwarfed the Holocaust in every category of atrocity, there isn't a single mention of the Bolshevik genocide anywhere on the IHRA website.
In Article 13 of the 2020 IHRA Ministerial Declaration:
We, the IHRA Member Countries, recognize that understanding the unprecedented
unprecedented…
nature of the Holocaust is essential to the prevention of genocide and mass atrocity crimes. IHRA expertise is relevant to historically informed policymaking and addressing contemporary challenges.
If there is anything on which we can all agree, surely, it must be the paramount importance of preventing genocide and mass atrocity. The IHRA purports to undertake that noble cause, using its “core competencies in education, remembrance and research about the Holocaust… [to] guide educators, scholars and activists responding to emerging mass atrocity crimes today.” To that end, “deploring the extensive loss of life and rejecting the gross Holocaust distortion being used to justify it,” in 2022, “IHRA Honorary Chairman Professor Yehuda Bauer stressed the importance of all IHRA Member Countries showing their support for Ukraine.”
But the IHRA hasn't condemned the mass atrocity ongoing against the Palestinians in Gaza. A search of the word “Palestinian” on the IHRA website produced only one mention. It was from a 2018 statement, “IHRA Chair's Statement on Antisemitic Comments by President Mahmoud Abbas.” Abbas was president of the Palestinian Authority.1
The US House of Representatives is 99 3/4 percent a shameful embarrassment to the country. The one quarter of one percent that isn’t is named Thomas Massie. Here’s how great Thomas Massie is: John Podhoeretz, the Jewish editor of the New York Post, publicly called him, a sitting member of Congress, “antisemitic filth.”2
I saw an announcement from Rep. Massie that he would not be supporting the new IHRA antisemitism bill. So I went to govtrack.us to see whether the usual suspects were behind it. They were.
I have a new representative in Congress. He is a Republican representing Kansas’ 2nd District. His name is Derek Schmidt. A lawyer, by trade. He is an original co-sponsor to H.R. 1007, Mike Lawler’s anti-free speech IHRA bill.3
One month in Congress, and Derek Schmidt has already shown himself willing to strip us of the one really good thing we Americans had—the right to say what we think—and give Jews the power to tell us what we may or may not say in our own country. So, I called his office in DC at (202) 225-6601 and asked the staffer to ask him how it is he wants to make it an act of antisemitic discrimination for me to say the Jews are committing genocide in Gaza if, in fact, I believe the Jews are committing genocide in Gaza?4 Isn’t it my right as an American to say what I believe?
For my American readers, if you want to see whether your own representative in Congress wants to give Jews the power to dictate what you may or may not say about Jews in your own country, here is the link to the list of co-sponsors.
The foregoing is derived from a query letter I sent the IHRA in December, 2023. The claims regarding its website were valid then. I don’t know about now.
Rep. Massie had announced he would not be voting for another massive payout to our best friend in the Middle East citing the much greater public debt load of the American people compared to the Israelis. In other words, Massie took the side of the American people over the Israelis, and “American” John Podhoeretz called him “antisemitic filth” for that. By the way, if you wonder whether John Podhoeretz is more loyal to Israel than the United States, you are also “antisemitic filth.”
Here is how awful Kansas is: all three of its representatives in Congress are already on board with Mike Lawler’s anti-free speech bill.
Congress.gov hasn’t posted the text of the bill, yet, but if it is the same bill as the one that Lawler introduced in the 118th Congress, that is exactly what the bill does.
Jesus: "Love thy neighbour." Short and sweet.
Jews countered with: "Don't hate us." Short, but not so sweet.
So they settled on this: "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities."
Hard not to gag on such a mouthful.
Jesus nailed it, and then the Jews nailed him to the cross. The rest is history.
Sorry to see you are being represented by Fred Flintstone in Congress, Craig.