ADL's "Holy War for Judah"

Meanwhile, one Kansas farmer has a more accurate picture of WWII than all the high school history teachers in the state combined

In the town where I am one of 2,140 residents there is a small newspaper that is “Published Daily Except Saturday and Sunday on the Santa Fe Trail in Council Grove, Kansas.”

The Council Grove Republican has been publishing since 1872. You can get it at the paper’s downtown office, or have it delivered by the paper boy. It’s also available at several businesses around town, where it’s sold on the honor system; a canister in which to drop your coins is attached to the display rack. The price of the Council Grove Republican recently rose to 60 cents from 50 cents, but it is a safe bet no one involved with publishing the paper is doing it to get rich.

The local paper chronicles the goings-on at the high school, celebrating or commiserating, as the case may be, with the fortunes of the Council Grove Braves. There’s the three-day weather forecast and what’s being served for lunch at the local schools, Senior Center, and nursing home. There are legal notices and classifieds and puppies-for-good-home ads, job promotions and drug arrests, births, weddings, and deaths. And there is lots and lots of reminiscing.

It’s a well-done little paper and Council Grove is lucky to have it.

Recently, in the reminiscing department, the paper has been re-running articles about Camp Fremont—a WWII encampment for captured German prisoners-of-war located at Council Grove. Apparently, with so many young white gentile men¹ off fighting FDR’s war to, as Oscar-nominated Jew, Lee Kern, explains it, punish the Germans for resisting Jewish supremacy, there weren’t enough young white men left here in the United States to grow the food we all, including the young white men off killing young white men in Europe, need. So, to make up the domestic deficit in young white men, the US military, instead of killing them, sent some of the enemy’s young white men back here to the States where they lived in internment camps and harvested food for no pay.

Here is an excerpt from Tamsen Emerson’s interview of local farmer, Andy Olson (71), for whom some of the prison labor had once worked. The interview took place at Mr. Olson’s home in rural Council Grove on March 16, 1983, some 40 years after the events described:

CG: There was a lot of rationing of supplies during the war, did you get extra supplies to feed [the German POWs]?

AO: No, we fed them.

CG: Did you get extra rations?

AO: No, no, the farmer was to feed them their noon meal.

CG: So, you just made lots more than usual?

AO: Seriously, you weren’t supposed to, according to the army, you were supposed to give them their noon meal, but you weren’t supposed to do, fact, you weren’t supposed to do them any favors period. That’s what they told you.

…

CG: Is there anything else about these prisoners that would be of interest?

AO: Well, seriously, I don’t have any animosity against the German people like some folks do. After I heard these two boys tell me why it was the war was started, and I could see that now. Now, the method how presumably Hitler done these things I don’t—I don’t agree with. But as far as the nation trying to get out from under the grip of that thing I don’t think you can blame them for that.

But blamed they are, Mr. Olson. Indeed, third and fourth-generation “Holocaust” “survivors” are still feeding on the descendants of these vanquished Germans. The massive irony of it all is that the descendants of the “victorious” Americans are being fed upon to an even greater degree.

CG: Were they loyal to Hitler? I mean, did they respect the man?

AO: I don’t think it is like we read in the papers, like there is a respect for him like that, see, I think these, and just these two boys, I don’t think respected him for what he done. But he was their leader, he knew what their cause was, and he was trying to get it right. Well, so that’s what it really amounted to was that they probably admired him and thought he was doing the right thing. Of course, they were at odds at some of the methods by which he was doing some of these things.

CG: Were they aware of some of the atrocities that were going on in their country against the Jews?

AO: Yes, they were, and they didn’t condone it. And that thing, that, didn’t make them feel good. They were treated so good here see, and some of their own people, some like what they would have been, the ones that Hitler was after, seriously, was their enemy really.

The Bolshevist, communist, international Jews…the ones that Hitler was after, seriously, was their enemy really. And, in fact, your enemy, too, Mr. Olson. The Josh Gottheimers, the Brad Shermans, the Randy Fines, the George Soroses, the Rabbi Ferskos, the Henry Morgenthau, Jrs. They hate you and want you dead. Just like, seriously, an enemy really. Why can’t we get our heads around that? Have our Bibles made us that stupid?

[Dwight Eisenhower has entered the chat]

And so what it boiled down to in my thought was that they didn’t think it was right that Germany treated their enemies as bad. They didn’t think they should have done all that they done see. So they weren’t happy about that. On the other hand too, they didn’t have much to say about it.

CG: You said you could tell me what those two boys looked like. Why don’t you describe them?

AO: Okay…

Mr. Olson goes on to describe one as 5’ 8-9” (172 - 175 cm), slender build, about 150 (68 kg) the son of a colonel—a career man in the German army. The other boy was a little shorter and stockier. He continues:

AO: Both of them were real clean shaven all the time. Immaculate in their dress, real good in their speech you know. They didn’t have harsh words. They were well-chosen words whatever they spoke. And they weren’t boys to just chatter and run off at the mouth. They were very serious, deep-thinking boys, matter-of-fact, I sure admired them. Maybe I’ll think of their names and send them to you.

Anything else Mr. Olson wanted to add?

AO: As a people, the people here as civilians, we thought that the Army in their rules and one thing and another [against] these boys was rather harsh…

Seriously, as far as our county organization was concerned, we had far more trouble with the officers in charge of the camp than we ever had with any of the prisoners. Simply because the thought that we as civilians had, see, didn’t tie together with your strict army life. So we as civilians here had lots more trouble getting along with the personnel, the Army personnel in that camp, than we did of all the German prisoners…

Let me go out on a limb here—I’m guessing that running labor camps stateside during WWII was the type of “military service” to which Jews were especially drawn.

CG: How old were you at the time? During the war?

AO: Well, I [was] born in 1912 so 12 from 43, 30, 31…

CG: Thirty? You had your family and…

AO: Yes, at that time I had the one girl. My second daughter was born way late.

CG: Oh. So, since you were a farmer then you didn’t have to go into the service?

AO: Of course, I was drafted. I had to sign up but no, I wasn’t taken because at that time they ran it according to units and if your farming had so many units you were more essential to raise food than what you were to go to the Army. So I was farming and had the set-up here and we had a local draft board that would tell who went and who didn’t. In no way was I eligible, and I didn’t care to go. Just as well be frank. I didn’t care to go.

I don’t blame you, Mr. Olson, but you were probably stigmatized at the time as being unpatriotic or cowardly for not going off to teach the Germans a lesson about resisting Jewish supremacy. If only our people had known the reason for the war at the time. If only we knew it now.²

According to the Census Bureau, 72 percent of Council Grovians today claim German or partial German ancestry. The Germanic percentage of the population was undoubtedly even higher in 1940 when, with the passage of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the “draft law”) more than a year before the “surprise” attack on Pearl Harbor catapulted America into WWII, Congress began building up US military forces. That the draft law was passed in anticipation of war with Germany can be discerned in this paragraph from the bill.

The Selective Training and Service Act of 1940: if one of your workers is drafted into the military, his replacement can be neither a commie nor a fascist

The draft law Congress passed in September, 1940, made membership in the German-American Bund,³ which was a locus of political opposition to American entry into WWII, tantamount to membership in the tiny and vilified Communist Party. And while the Communist Party was the carrier of the murderous ideology already responsible, by that time, for the mass murder of tens of millions of Russian Christians, the German-American Bund was simply a particular ethnic group, the second largest in the country, organized politically.⁴ ⁵

A political center of Jewish support for America’s entry into WWII was the Anti-Defamation League. The powerful Jewish organization, in full agreement with Oscar-nominated Jew, Lee Kern, saw WWII as a war for the benefit of Jews. The following is from the “Special Notice to All Jews”⁶ from the Central Committee of the Anti-Defamation League, part of a trove of documents exposing the cooperation between the FBI and the ADL that, for some reason, was classified material for 40 years. This, from p. 119 of that trove, calls on all Jews to agitate for US entry into the war against Germany:

By “triumphs of 1918,” I assume the ADL means the Treaty of Versailles and the peace conference that produced it. The peace conference, to which world Jewry sent its own delegation (!), subjugated Germany under Jewish power, subjected the defeated Germans to the vengeance of the slaughter-god, and set the stage for the even more destructive WWII, that orgy of white Christians slaughtering white Christians.

And notice the prior knowledge of the introduction of the “draft law,” which carries the date September 16, 1940.

In Deuteronomy 7:24, Jehovah orders Judah: “And he shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them.” There have been three great revolutions in Europe in which kings were delivered into the hands of the revolution: the English Revolution of 1642, the French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917. In all three cases, the kings were executed and great dynasties came to an end. These revolutions were neither English nor French nor Russian. All three countries were conquered by Judah. America, an easier conquest, joined Great Britain, France, and Russia to obliterate the people among whom our race had reached its highest expression and who offered the most capable resistance to the Talmudic cabal.

Given the ADL’s prior knowledge of the introduction of the draft law, it isn’t unreasonable to suppose the ADL had some input on its content.

Perhaps we can spot some such influence. From the same letter:

And from the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940:

I think we found the influence.

The ADL urged Jews to use Jewish power to push America into war against Germany and simultaneously instructed Jews to exempt themselves from combat roles by claiming to be “opposed to participation in war in any form” for religious reasons.

Oh, ADL, you poisonous devils, just because it would require the assistance of the supernatural to both agitate for and abstain from war simultaneously doesn’t mean your political program for world domination is an actual religion. Please stop pretending it is.

In a 1940 letter (i.e., a letter written before we were at war with Germany) from the head of the ADL in New York to the head of the ADL in Chicago, an effort to derail the effort to derail Roosevelt’s war is discussed (p. 114):

This might be a good time to remind everyone that when this letter was written, the Nazis were simply a new political party in Germany who had taken power legally through the democratic process. But, as this letter shows, American Jews were already working behind the scenes with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the federal immigration service to sabotage the effort of German-Americans to keep us out of war. Oh, and Hitler was the warmonger. Meanwhile, of course, there seems to be no concern at all over who might be “tied up” with the Soviet Union’s Bolsheviks, who were, by the time this letter was written, already responsible for the utter destruction of thousands of churches (but no synagogues), and the mass murder of more than 20 million Russian Christians.

There were other targets. This is from an internal FBI memo in October 1940 (p. 121):

It’s worth taking a look through the 126 pages of the FBI documents to get a sense just how ruthless and devious the Jews were in implementing their default foreign policy goal: Let’s you and him fight.

I found page 116 especially chilling. It is a 1940 extract from “New York editorial information,” which was syndicated to 250 newspaper editors. An “EXPERT” is quoted:

In the extraordinary thoroughness of the Anti-Defamation League’s organization neither effort nor expense is spared to bring its files to the highest possible state of perfection.

One of its most successful efforts has been a confidential letter to all professional men and women of the B’nai B’rith⁷—doctors, dentists, lawyers, etc. Each recipient has been asked to pay special attention to the friendly or unfriendly attitude of the people with whom he comes in contact. Reports were requested concerning any instances—large or small—where religious intolerance had been shown. The results went beyond the best expectations.

Special investigation work has been brought to a very high point. The F.B.I. cooperates closely as do the Army and Navy intelligence. It is reported that a certain number of F.B.I. men have been taken into the A.D.L. for coaching on the finer points of investigation work that have been developed by the voluntary organization.

In other words, we know everything about you, you newspaper men—every offhand comment that could be taken as—even slightly—unfriendly to Jews, every questionable association, every failure to show due deference to Judaic sensitivity, every pointed “Merry Christmas,” every contribution—real or imaginary, intentional or unintentional—to atmospheric antisemitism: we know it all and it is in your file and at our fingertips. Our eyes and ears are everywhere around you. At a moment’s notice, we can bring the charge of “religious intolerance” against you and bring it with the power of the most dangerous and secretive elements of the state at our side.

A masterful bit of intimidation there. And accurate. The declassified FBI trove contains a list of the names of the individuals who participated in the ADL’s nationwide network of Jewish civilians monitoring and reporting on their gentile neighbors. The list is 107 pages long.⁸

From the Special Agent in Charge in the Chicago FBI office to all field offices

And the hapless Christian youths sent to the slaughter? They had no powerful friends on draft boards, no gentile physicians who would protect them from the horror of combat. Here are the names of the 71 young white men Council Grove/Morris County sacrificed to the destruction of Judah’s greatest enemy—their own people.

Did you know, boys? Did you know as you lay bleeding out on foreign soil and crying for your mother that you were fighting and dying in a holy war for Judah?

While the boys whose names are inscribed on the plaque in front of the Morris County courthouse were off dying for Judah overseas, on a farm outside of town two German boys were telling Mr. Olson “why it was the war was started, and I could see that now. Now, the method how presumably Hitler done these things I don’t—I don’t agree with. But as far as the nation trying to get out from under the grip of that thing I don’t think you can blame them for that.”

1. Young white gentile men

2. Here’s a simple filter to apply to help separate warmongering propaganda from legitimate warnings of foreign threats. The more the public rhetoric emphasizes the danger posed by a single individual, the more likely it is to be groundless warmongering. By this method, the demonization of Kim Il Jong and Vladimir Putin indicates the threats posed by North Korea and Russia are minimal.

3. A bund is a cultural or political association. Prior to 1917, the Jewish Bund in Russia was the locus of Jewish political power. In heavily Jewish parts of Russia, the Bolshevik party was small and weak when the revolution came because, until then, the long-established Jewish Bund had always absorbed leftist Jewish political energy. With its seizure of power in 1917, the Bolsheviks, in preparation for the extermination of 66 million Russian Christians, decreed all other political parties illegal. The Jewish Bund simply changed its name to “Bolshevik” and carried on. Indeed, in Odessa, a synagogue initially served as the city’s Bolshevik headquarters and, with the declaration by Lenin in early 1918 that “antisemites” were “outlaws,” in effect, making antisemitism a capital offense, the first midnight roundups of Christians—the most capable, well-informed ones—were administered from there.

4. Anyone who argues that Hitler’s Germany was the sole European aggressor in WWII needs to account for the enmity that the US government was already manifesting against its own citizens of German descent as evidenced in this legislation overtly preparing for war against Germany long before war with Germany was declared.

5. The amazing fact that this legislation openly targeted a specific ethnicity helps put the lie to the claim that WWII was fought for “our freedom,” or “to defend democracy against tyranny,” or for any other high-sounding abstraction. At its root, it was Jew vs gentile. It was a war fought to bring finally all the West under the Talmudic yoke.

6. I once met a friend for beers at McSorley’s, a famous old beer-soaked dive in New York City’s East Village a half block from Cooper Union. He’d lent me a biography of the world’s first global superstar, Charles Lindbergh, and I was returning it. As we stood, talking, I happened to notice a dingy sign high up the wall behind the bar: “Charles Lindbergh will never darken these doors again.” The owner of McSorley’s had discovered a clever way of asserting a political position popular with the student body at Cooper Union more than a half century on while bathing the bar in the past glory of a visit by the world famous American gentile.
The ADL engaged “all Jews” in its warmongering effort, yet when Lindbergh, in his famous Des Moines speech on the eve of America’s entry into WWII, accurately identified Jewish power as one of the forces driving us toward another massively destructive war against Germany, the ADL destroyed him and he remains a vilified antisemite today—including, contemptibly, by his own people. Eventually, the airport in St Louis named in his honor will change its name, the Jews will celebrate, and the gentiles of St Louis will ignorantly shrug in indifference at yet another indignity inflicted on one of their greatest heroes.

7. B’nai B’rith was founded as a German Jewish cultural association on October 13, 1843, on New York City’s Lower East Side by a dozen recent Jewish immigrants. Initially its meetings were conducted in German—the members’ first language—and its name was Bundes-Brüder, German for Brothers of the Covenant. It wasn’t long before the brothers of the covenant became the enemies of mankind. B’nai B’rith spawned the Anti-Defamation League, which led the effort to destroy German American cultural associations.

8. pp. 4-111