We're at an interesting junction with race realism, and IMHO the various approaches and conversations taking place around how we get from where we are, to where we need to go, are a very positive development.
I've never felt comfortable calling myself a "White Nationalist," but I am definitely learning a lot from the people who do, and I have a great deal of respect and admiration for their courage and willingness to pit themselves against the odds.
At my age, though, pragmatism tends to trump idealism. I want to put my energies into an approach that will give real results. For example, the idea of a White ethnostate, at least in North America, has always struck me as a pie-in-the-sky option.
Lucas Gage has also recently written about the idea of getting past the Jews' strategy of "let you and them fight."
I couldn't agree more about the open conversations being a very positive development. I wonder how many times Substack has been approached by Jews with big offers to buy them out like they did with Reddit, for example. PLEASE DON'T SELL OUT, SUBSTACK! THESE PEOPLE DROP BOMBS ON CHILDREN ASLEEP IN THEIR OWN BEDS!
And thank you for posting that WN speech: case in point. It forced me to think through my own thoughts on the WN thing.
I, too, respect the effort and courage. As I have often said, just making the effort is a success and puts them way way ahead of most of our somnolent people. I hope they take my criticism in the spirit in which it was meant--for the greater good.
The way I see it, there is only one issue. But it overshadows and blots everything else out because it is so urgent and momentous.
The Christian Zionists are the final nail in Christianity's coffin. If there were a way to salvage something of Christianity, Christian Zionism is making sure it will never be tried. It is an embarrassment and a shame. Imagine. Christians. openly supporting the murder of children just so they can get "blessed." it's disgusting beyond words. Not as disgusting as Judaism, but up in that general vicinity.
They are deceived. Scripture says they would be. It is our task to set them right with our (White) God YHWH, for the Final Days war. They must become true saints, soldiers in the White God's army as has been foretold, or they go into the Lake of Fire with the other anti-Christs.
Isn't that stupid? Um, we worship a universal god who has special people. No wonder we are so stupid. Our religion makes us that way. Plus, it has us murdering children in their own beds, in their own homes, on their own streets, in their own cities. Hey world, accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, and you can be as stupid and evil as we are.
It is stupid. The guy who told me that isn’t stupid, at least based on the usual metrics of success, law school, reasonable finances etc. At the age where introspection and care of spirituality and the soul become important, at least to some. He can’t see any of that. Any of what I think you are alluding to. I didn’t try to argue, I just said we can leave that subject. Same with another friend who took the injections. He is an M.D. I asked why would you take an E.U.A. injection? His answer was mostly an appeal to authority. That was a subject we agreed to leave alone.
God YHWH is NOT universal, that comes from Roman Empire Catholicism. Jesus/Yahshua came as Yahweh in the flesh ONLY for the Children of the Lost Sheep of Jacob Israel. Because Jerusalem had fallen under control of Edomites/Canaanites (Book of Maccabees) the once Holy Land was to be forsaken. "No more good fruit may come from here". I am an Identity Christian specifically because judeo-Christianity is an obvious oxymoron. I didn't get to study Scripture myself until about 2006, when I was 44. It's very obvious when you know what the ancient Hebrew and Greek actually say that modern white Christians appear completely stupid. The only people who should be Christians are White Israelites. NO ONE ELSE.
That was one of the worst incidents of "taking the knee" ever captured on social media... and there were so many.
Every time I saw someone genuflecting like that, I was reminded of that line from the Bible: “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other."
That kind of virtue signalling is an abomination against yourself and God.
I argued the same point as you in the below linked post, where I wrote:
"This is a big reason why both garden-variety civic nationalism and far-right white nationalism is a dead end: putting aside that the West is rapidly turning brown and black and that the Germans who elected the Nazis had a 98% white country (i.e. it was an easy Schelling point at the time), and that the white world population has shrunk from 25% of the world population in 1900 to 6.5% today, it doesn’t understand that their globohomo opposition suppresses nationalism everywhere, therefore resistance to it needs to take place on a global basis from a position of populism and nationalism everywhere. Everyone in the world other than the tiny number of central bank owning families and their underlings is a slave to this system, therefore everyone has an incentive to upend it. Even if the end goal is nationalism, it cannot be accomplished while this global system is in force. A focus on race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. is a distraction given the scope of the problem, except perhaps to understand the complicated relationship between the central bankers and the Jewish people as a whole. Indeed, encouraging the populations of the world to fight amongst each other, rooted in the egalitarian ratchet effect, is one of globohomo’s chief methods of control to keep people from discovering their ongoing theft. Any objective of self-sovereignty must begin with the identification of this system as it structurally exists and then fought locally and worldwide with the conviction that globohomo’s national “leaders” are mere powerless figureheads for global forces. In other words, the North Star when viewing “new political or social developments” should be with the structure and motivations of the world’s central bank owners in mind."
You think you can rise up against this? The world is seduced by the Trumpstein, who filled his first cabinet with Goldman Sachs boys. And with influencers like Rogan and Peterson, the dumbed down masses fate is being sealed into the charade. Besides that, on every level of influence and power, from school boards to board rooms, all the wrong people are in all the right places.
Christians have been duped into believing that if they just choose the golden calf of the orange messiah, all will be well; all the divorces, all the adulteries, all the abortions, all the homosexuality, all the crooked behavior will be of no consequence. When in fact, the cup of sin is full and about to tip over. Payment will be demanded.
What people have not reconciled in their minds, is that God cares much less about the material well being, than the spiritual well being.
Psalm 90:3-9
3 You turn people back to dust,
saying, “Return to dust, you mortals.”
4 A thousand years in your sight
are like a day that has just gone by,
or like a watch in the night.
5 Yet you sweep people away in the sleep of death—
That’s my main disagreement with Craig. I don’t have a problem with the idea of a master race. The NT cannot be untethered from the OT, and the point of the Old Testament was to bring forth a messiah. And that messiah had to come from a pure human bloodline. It’s the reason for the very peculiar laws of the Hebrews, which set them distinctly apart from all other peoples around them. And that messiah was brought forth, which concluded the main function of Judaism.
These Jews today - the segment that authentic Jews - are divinely gifted rebels. Step back and take an objective look at what they accomplish everywhere they go, with their uncanny knack at gaining control through finance and intrigues. There is definitely something of a gifted ability at work there.
And yet, God uses all things to his purpose, and those rascals are a scourge to the unbelieving world, which is filled with idolatry (think of the insult that Darwinian evolution is to the magnificent work of the Creator), immorality, and criminal behavior. The Jews fill the world with porn, but the gentiles consume it. Ditto for every other vice and immorality.
So there is a reckoning happening and “the chosen” ones are his scourge. If men behaved themselves appropriately (according to the morality that is written on our heart - we know when we are doing wrong), we wouldn’t be in this situation.
An interesting take. I'll have to ponder this over. Christ doesn't necessitate being Jewish. Marcionism doesn't accept the OT crap and none of the Jewishness from Peter to John's destructive revenge fantasy.
Frankly I'd rather live without a scourge. The demiurge doesn't have to keep winning.
2. The Bible is unapologetically correct, a singular God runs things, and you have no say in it. You don’t have to like it, but it is what it is. (And this looks very similar to the demiurge).
3. We are in a simulation run by a computer, and every moment is manufactured on the spot or the result of things set in motion.
However, of all causes and effects on this life, none are more consequential than The Jews and Jesus, and those two must be looked at objectively, scrutinized carefully, and observed honestly. Their backstories and results of those stories, must necessarily be put in context, honestly and without agenda.
My suspicion here, is that Craig may have a personal moral agenda that puts him at odds with the Bible, thus his sustained, vitriolic attacks on the entire edifice. I think he is using one issue to attack with, to cover for another personal issue. If you can take down Deuteronomy on the master race issue, all other issues go down with it, and I’m not talking about bacon or shellfish.
While we will always disagree about the OT, the evidence that you produce on “the synagogue of Satan” is damning. By and large, the Christian church refuses to even look at this kind of information, which is going to bite them in the ass soon enough.
And there is no better proof than the antisemitism legislation passed in the house of non-representatives a few months ago when team red voted in favor far more than team blue in direct violation of the constitution via the first amendment.
Ahh, the old deflection trope. Jew Envy. So the rather ethnic nature of say Soviet Bolshevism and the modern Leftist movement should be ignored? Half of Biden's cabinet is ethnic. Putin's 3 oligarch handlers are ethnic. But pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
You have created some fallacious arguments to support your perspective. So remigration is wrong because why? You also shift the goalposts. How does the plight of blacks relate to the destructive nature of Jewish minorities in nations? Why is nationalism wrong? I would just like the nation that my ancestors attempted to forge; what do you fight for?
Jews are welcome to Israel and may they all make Aliyah. It's not my responsibility to defend them or their aggressions. The fact that you make your argument all about race shows your true colors. The reality is defending national interests but you want to make a racial argument to claim the moral high ground.
I tend to shy away from the "White Nationalist" moniker. Apparently, there are many of them that so despise Christianity that they attack Christians moreso than the jew (the real enemy of mankind). No, Zionist Christians don't help, and sadly make my job much harder (and they get my scorn).
Frankly, I wish I could live in a white only world, then I think of the white nationalists that tell me that because I am a 63 year old "Boomer" and a "Christian" (that most other Christians despise, by the way) that it is better for me to die, then I realize that these "white nationalists" are not really in it for whiteness.
Hell, I wish a new National Socialist type of entity could arise, but it is clear that it would be an impossibility in America due to the vast diversity purposefully done to eliminate any potential chance that it could happen.
I agree w/ the basic premise that WN is short sighted for the reasons Craig lays out and others add to. What I can't understand is the weird graph of holocausts. Sounds like an important comparative tool. But I've never seen this mystifying format before. A couple of explanatory paragraphs are requested.
That's a cumulative area chart. Each color represents a single genocide of +2 million stacked on top of each other so that the total height along the x-axis represents total genocide victims.
But you have seen the format before, because you made the same request last time I posted this chart. I shamefully neglected to follow up. What should I add to make it more explanatory? It is a powerful chart and I want people to understand what it is showing
Then we lose the time aspect. Showing the cumulative total as the century progresses helps illustrate first, that not only were Jews the most murderous people of the 20th Century (and per capita, they are off the charts), but they are the ones who kicked off the century of genocide; and, second, it's much easier to see that Nazism was a response to Bolshevism.
Thanks for that, but still not happy w/ this chart. He accepts figures v the Nazis that are unfair. Both the 6M re Jews and 11M v Europeans are unlikely. Are the 6M part of the 11M? Every colored line/official count could be questioned especially since it's dealing w/ millions.
I suspect the naming of Jews in any but victim categories is not the prof's doing but yours. I'm not knocking it. It's inclusive. Just trying to keep the perspective real in terms of an official/academic graph.
I notice the most recent genocide listed is Cambodian v Cambodian, but the perps were Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge. 2.5 seems an arbitrary threshold, especially when the captured population is limited itself as w/ the Cambodians. PP managed to wipe out a quarter of his people.
The gradually inclining lines in many cases are not warranted because the particular genocide ended years earlier. They should level off. It creates a bulk impression which is undue. Seems a flaw inherent in the format.
The lines continue to increase gradually (but in parallel) because people were still being killed in the Soviet Union until 1987. Also, you have to put the threshold somewhere. I chose 2 million as the cutoff for a "major" slaughter. Granted, it's arbitrary, but necessarily so. I used the prof's data for the number of victims (for which he seems careful and judicious) and the time periods. The labels are mine. I could have called the German Nazis European Christians or Christian fascists if I wanted. I chose labels that would heighten the distinctions, e.g., European Jews vs Bolshevik Jews. I took the figures for the Nazis--unfair as they may be--as presented only because I want the emphasis to be on how, either way, the Holocaust is dwarfed by the holocausts. I want people to ask, "How come we don't know about these?" "Why is the Holocaust somehow special?" Once people ask those questions, their journey to the light has begun. :)
Fair enough from your earlier perspective. If one can read the chart, one can see what you say.
I think old school leftists don't fall for "eternal victims" or "6M must be obeyed". They recognize those tropes as religiously based. What they do fall for is Hitler was evil and what happened to the Jews during WW2 was a humanitarian tragedy. They also believe in the gas chambers. (Normies always believe in them too.) I think the liberal's stance is an ideological preference for communism over fascism which insulates them from inconvenient facts about the implausibility of the H. They won't read Revisionist literature because they feel it's going to exonerate Hitler and Nazis.
The whole "Jehovah" pagan conspiracy bullshit is getting tiring.
They don't follow the God of the Bible, they follow Moloch, aka Saturn, aka Satan.
Just look at your own quote from the Protocols of Zion:
"A world coalition of Gentiles could cope with us temporarily, but we are assured against this by roots of dissension among them so deep that they cannot be torn out. We have created antagonism between the personal and national interests of the Gentiles by arousing religious and race hatreds which we have nourished in their hearts for twenty centuries."
Well, what happened twenty centuries ago that made them start plotting against us? We all know the answer.
As for our polity, calling ourselves gentiles or goyim, even though I occasionally do it, is actually using their terminology for our own identity, which is psychologically damaging in the long term. We should just call ourselves Mankind United and the jews the Plutocrats or Parasites, the Anti-Humans, Vampires, etc. See my Synarchist Manifesto (link in bio) for a proposed strategy for a coalition of this kind.
The Hart-Celler Act is a product of the Judeo-Gentile coalition. Solely blaming Jews for mass-migration is disingenuous.
White Nationalism is a secular movement with no economic policy. For some peculiar reason White Nationalists seem to overlook the ramifications of a secular culture. For example: we now have state sponsored sodomy for an entire month of the year.
That being said, I agree with the other fundamental points of the article. Regardless of how demoralizing it is.
Scripture isn't Jewish, it comes from the Israelites, who were/are White people. The Christian destiny tells us we had it all and will lose it, but fight back with our God's help to save our race from destruction. The Talmud teaches the Jews that we are dumb animals over whom they will be slave masters. Two completely different cultures/people/dutures. As for nations, I prefer Francis Parker Yockey's definition in his book, Imperium. Nations are subdivisions within a culture (racial) in which the members have a shared history of blood and soil who are maintained by a state for political purpose. They may wrestle for control of the culture's direction, but they do not, or should not annihilate each other. This only became possible because of the Enlightenment and the outsider Jews having a huge part in redirecting our culture through their control of the leading nation or nations here in Western Christian Culture/Civilization at any given time. Taking hold of England under Cromwell was a huge win for them, especially as England would become the standard bearer of liberalism and capitalism. They jumped ship to the USA and USSR, while steering England into the position it is now, overwhelmed by outlanders and no longer an empire. They have already steered the US and Russia towards self-destruction in the 100 years they've dominated each politically as they now have Kike Central in Palestine, and Kike Central is right in the middle of the political world .... Eurasia/Africa. The Western Hemisphere has a quarter of the people and resources by comparison, and the US is going down the shithole in a slow motion civil war while new third world recruits are being brought in by the millions to finish the job.
As a normie but untriggered observer of political extremism, the main point I always make to antisemitic right is “don’t you see the fundamental similarity between what you accuse Jews of doing and what you want white people to be doing to non-whites? In both cases, complete indifference or hostility to outsiders. Hyper-nationalism for me but not for thee. At best, WN want to arrange reservations for blacks, or maybe a boat ride back to Africa at gunpoint. They argue about how big the boat should be and whether or not blacks should have to pay for it. Right wing ant-semitism strikes me as a perverted form of Jew envy. Your hatred for them is matched only by your desire to imitate them.
WN culture says we should treat our neighbor like we treat our brother and the stranger like we treat our neighbor. Jewish culture says if you lend money to another Jew, don't charge interest, but charge interest from a gentile, and eventually you will own everything in their country.
WN culture says we should use our language to communicate our intent. Jewish culture says when you approach a city to take possession of it, cry "Peace, peace." If the people of the city believe you and open their gates to you, enslave them. If the city resists, lay siege and when you have broken the defenses, kill all the males and enslave the women and children.
The white nationalists want to be left alone to build communities among their own kind, raise their children according to their cultural norms, have a border that is respected, and establish institutions and policies that will benefit them and their descendants rather than be turned into weapons against them.
Jews want to rule a slave-world in which Jews are the master race--a kind of priestly over-class--and everyone else is there to serve them. Zionism has reignited a vulgar chauvinism within the breast of the Jew that thrills to the very idea of that. These aren't normies.
No one is trying to imitate you. The rest of the world recognizes you for the depraved, dangerous, untrustworthy, insatiable, subversive menace that you are. We would rather just be rid of the Judaic infection..
You might be right about the hatred though. Some people are just hateworthy.
Well you have the phenomenon of white nationalists who want to see the end of Israel and also want to expel Jews from America and other white countries.
You can't blame anyone for wanting to expel the Jews. No one wants to host a parasite that's killing them. But I have never heard anyone advocate expelling the Jews in the manner the Jews are "expelling " the Palestinians from their native land.
As for "want to see the end of Israel," why don't you speak plainly? Do you mean they want the US to stop letting Israel and Israelis soak us every year for hundreds of billions of dollars in cash, military stockpiles, one-sided contracts, and plain ol' fraud? Is that what you mean by "the end of Israel?" If so, then I agree with the WN. I'd like to see the end of Israel, too.
We're at an interesting junction with race realism, and IMHO the various approaches and conversations taking place around how we get from where we are, to where we need to go, are a very positive development.
I've never felt comfortable calling myself a "White Nationalist," but I am definitely learning a lot from the people who do, and I have a great deal of respect and admiration for their courage and willingness to pit themselves against the odds.
At my age, though, pragmatism tends to trump idealism. I want to put my energies into an approach that will give real results. For example, the idea of a White ethnostate, at least in North America, has always struck me as a pie-in-the-sky option.
Lucas Gage has also recently written about the idea of getting past the Jews' strategy of "let you and them fight."
https://lucasgage.substack.com/p/gentiles-of-the-world-unite
My overall sense is that if we can name our common enemy, sorting out a great deal of our other problems will be so much easier.
I couldn't agree more about the open conversations being a very positive development. I wonder how many times Substack has been approached by Jews with big offers to buy them out like they did with Reddit, for example. PLEASE DON'T SELL OUT, SUBSTACK! THESE PEOPLE DROP BOMBS ON CHILDREN ASLEEP IN THEIR OWN BEDS!
And thank you for posting that WN speech: case in point. It forced me to think through my own thoughts on the WN thing.
I, too, respect the effort and courage. As I have often said, just making the effort is a success and puts them way way ahead of most of our somnolent people. I hope they take my criticism in the spirit in which it was meant--for the greater good.
The way I see it, there is only one issue. But it overshadows and blots everything else out because it is so urgent and momentous.
This is it exactly. Who is trying to destroy things from the basic family unit to national cohesion through increasingly insane dictates.
I live in a city populated with evangelical zionists. They would feel blessed if a jew spit in their face. I can't bear to look at them anymore.
The Christian Zionists are the final nail in Christianity's coffin. If there were a way to salvage something of Christianity, Christian Zionism is making sure it will never be tried. It is an embarrassment and a shame. Imagine. Christians. openly supporting the murder of children just so they can get "blessed." it's disgusting beyond words. Not as disgusting as Judaism, but up in that general vicinity.
They are deceived. Scripture says they would be. It is our task to set them right with our (White) God YHWH, for the Final Days war. They must become true saints, soldiers in the White God's army as has been foretold, or they go into the Lake of Fire with the other anti-Christs.
I had a similar experience with a Lutheran, he told me jews were God's chosen people.
Isn't that stupid? Um, we worship a universal god who has special people. No wonder we are so stupid. Our religion makes us that way. Plus, it has us murdering children in their own beds, in their own homes, on their own streets, in their own cities. Hey world, accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, and you can be as stupid and evil as we are.
It is stupid. The guy who told me that isn’t stupid, at least based on the usual metrics of success, law school, reasonable finances etc. At the age where introspection and care of spirituality and the soul become important, at least to some. He can’t see any of that. Any of what I think you are alluding to. I didn’t try to argue, I just said we can leave that subject. Same with another friend who took the injections. He is an M.D. I asked why would you take an E.U.A. injection? His answer was mostly an appeal to authority. That was a subject we agreed to leave alone.
God YHWH is NOT universal, that comes from Roman Empire Catholicism. Jesus/Yahshua came as Yahweh in the flesh ONLY for the Children of the Lost Sheep of Jacob Israel. Because Jerusalem had fallen under control of Edomites/Canaanites (Book of Maccabees) the once Holy Land was to be forsaken. "No more good fruit may come from here". I am an Identity Christian specifically because judeo-Christianity is an obvious oxymoron. I didn't get to study Scripture myself until about 2006, when I was 44. It's very obvious when you know what the ancient Hebrew and Greek actually say that modern white Christians appear completely stupid. The only people who should be Christians are White Israelites. NO ONE ELSE.
Lutherans!!! Yes, at one time they were Jew wise weren't they?
They were. Martin Luther wrote a treatise on them. Perhaps harsh but as far as I know no one ever called him a liar.
What you stated, reminds me of when the kneeling began…https://youtu.be/dAMmmNMxXn8?si=G82lvCpsuY8AQrYe
That was one of the worst incidents of "taking the knee" ever captured on social media... and there were so many.
Every time I saw someone genuflecting like that, I was reminded of that line from the Bible: “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other."
That kind of virtue signalling is an abomination against yourself and God.
Well stated Anna! 🎯
I like your last sentence.
😳 horrifying
Very nice post, Craig.
I argued the same point as you in the below linked post, where I wrote:
"This is a big reason why both garden-variety civic nationalism and far-right white nationalism is a dead end: putting aside that the West is rapidly turning brown and black and that the Germans who elected the Nazis had a 98% white country (i.e. it was an easy Schelling point at the time), and that the white world population has shrunk from 25% of the world population in 1900 to 6.5% today, it doesn’t understand that their globohomo opposition suppresses nationalism everywhere, therefore resistance to it needs to take place on a global basis from a position of populism and nationalism everywhere. Everyone in the world other than the tiny number of central bank owning families and their underlings is a slave to this system, therefore everyone has an incentive to upend it. Even if the end goal is nationalism, it cannot be accomplished while this global system is in force. A focus on race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. is a distraction given the scope of the problem, except perhaps to understand the complicated relationship between the central bankers and the Jewish people as a whole. Indeed, encouraging the populations of the world to fight amongst each other, rooted in the egalitarian ratchet effect, is one of globohomo’s chief methods of control to keep people from discovering their ongoing theft. Any objective of self-sovereignty must begin with the identification of this system as it structurally exists and then fought locally and worldwide with the conviction that globohomo’s national “leaders” are mere powerless figureheads for global forces. In other words, the North Star when viewing “new political or social developments” should be with the structure and motivations of the world’s central bank owners in mind."
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-global-world-order-is-centralized
Thank you for the comment. I'm not familiar with this term. Can you explain it, please?
"egalitarian ratchet effect,"
Hi Craig, sure, please see here: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-ratchet-effect-why
You think you can rise up against this? The world is seduced by the Trumpstein, who filled his first cabinet with Goldman Sachs boys. And with influencers like Rogan and Peterson, the dumbed down masses fate is being sealed into the charade. Besides that, on every level of influence and power, from school boards to board rooms, all the wrong people are in all the right places.
Christians have been duped into believing that if they just choose the golden calf of the orange messiah, all will be well; all the divorces, all the adulteries, all the abortions, all the homosexuality, all the crooked behavior will be of no consequence. When in fact, the cup of sin is full and about to tip over. Payment will be demanded.
What people have not reconciled in their minds, is that God cares much less about the material well being, than the spiritual well being.
Psalm 90:3-9
3 You turn people back to dust,
saying, “Return to dust, you mortals.”
4 A thousand years in your sight
are like a day that has just gone by,
or like a watch in the night.
5 Yet you sweep people away in the sleep of death—
they are like the new grass of the morning:
6 In the morning it springs up new,
but by evening it is dry and withered.
7 We are consumed by your anger
and terrified by your indignation.
8 You have set our iniquities before you,
our secret sins in the light of your presence.
9 All our days pass away under your wrath;
we finish our years with a moan.
The author of this Psalm? Moses, the man of God.
It's the Master Race theology that Judaism is. The best hope is to duck and hope to ride things out near some mutually minded people.
That's what many Russians tried to do. Unsuccessfully.
That’s my main disagreement with Craig. I don’t have a problem with the idea of a master race. The NT cannot be untethered from the OT, and the point of the Old Testament was to bring forth a messiah. And that messiah had to come from a pure human bloodline. It’s the reason for the very peculiar laws of the Hebrews, which set them distinctly apart from all other peoples around them. And that messiah was brought forth, which concluded the main function of Judaism.
These Jews today - the segment that authentic Jews - are divinely gifted rebels. Step back and take an objective look at what they accomplish everywhere they go, with their uncanny knack at gaining control through finance and intrigues. There is definitely something of a gifted ability at work there.
And yet, God uses all things to his purpose, and those rascals are a scourge to the unbelieving world, which is filled with idolatry (think of the insult that Darwinian evolution is to the magnificent work of the Creator), immorality, and criminal behavior. The Jews fill the world with porn, but the gentiles consume it. Ditto for every other vice and immorality.
So there is a reckoning happening and “the chosen” ones are his scourge. If men behaved themselves appropriately (according to the morality that is written on our heart - we know when we are doing wrong), we wouldn’t be in this situation.
An interesting take. I'll have to ponder this over. Christ doesn't necessitate being Jewish. Marcionism doesn't accept the OT crap and none of the Jewishness from Peter to John's destructive revenge fantasy.
Frankly I'd rather live without a scourge. The demiurge doesn't have to keep winning.
It’s one of these 3 things isn’t it:
1. The demiurge
2. The Bible is unapologetically correct, a singular God runs things, and you have no say in it. You don’t have to like it, but it is what it is. (And this looks very similar to the demiurge).
3. We are in a simulation run by a computer, and every moment is manufactured on the spot or the result of things set in motion.
However, of all causes and effects on this life, none are more consequential than The Jews and Jesus, and those two must be looked at objectively, scrutinized carefully, and observed honestly. Their backstories and results of those stories, must necessarily be put in context, honestly and without agenda.
My suspicion here, is that Craig may have a personal moral agenda that puts him at odds with the Bible, thus his sustained, vitriolic attacks on the entire edifice. I think he is using one issue to attack with, to cover for another personal issue. If you can take down Deuteronomy on the master race issue, all other issues go down with it, and I’m not talking about bacon or shellfish.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kalkallim/p/secrets-of-the-hellenic-hebrew-apiru?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=u6zbj
Judaism was created by Ptolemaics in 250 BC. The world is far stranger than people realize.
While we will always disagree about the OT, the evidence that you produce on “the synagogue of Satan” is damning. By and large, the Christian church refuses to even look at this kind of information, which is going to bite them in the ass soon enough.
And there is no better proof than the antisemitism legislation passed in the house of non-representatives a few months ago when team red voted in favor far more than team blue in direct violation of the constitution via the first amendment.
Ahh, the old deflection trope. Jew Envy. So the rather ethnic nature of say Soviet Bolshevism and the modern Leftist movement should be ignored? Half of Biden's cabinet is ethnic. Putin's 3 oligarch handlers are ethnic. But pay no attention to the men behind the curtain.
You have created some fallacious arguments to support your perspective. So remigration is wrong because why? You also shift the goalposts. How does the plight of blacks relate to the destructive nature of Jewish minorities in nations? Why is nationalism wrong? I would just like the nation that my ancestors attempted to forge; what do you fight for?
Jews are welcome to Israel and may they all make Aliyah. It's not my responsibility to defend them or their aggressions. The fact that you make your argument all about race shows your true colors. The reality is defending national interests but you want to make a racial argument to claim the moral high ground.
Meant this as a reply to someone else but I don't feel like deleting it.
I tend to shy away from the "White Nationalist" moniker. Apparently, there are many of them that so despise Christianity that they attack Christians moreso than the jew (the real enemy of mankind). No, Zionist Christians don't help, and sadly make my job much harder (and they get my scorn).
Frankly, I wish I could live in a white only world, then I think of the white nationalists that tell me that because I am a 63 year old "Boomer" and a "Christian" (that most other Christians despise, by the way) that it is better for me to die, then I realize that these "white nationalists" are not really in it for whiteness.
Hell, I wish a new National Socialist type of entity could arise, but it is clear that it would be an impossibility in America due to the vast diversity purposefully done to eliminate any potential chance that it could happen.
I agree w/ the basic premise that WN is short sighted for the reasons Craig lays out and others add to. What I can't understand is the weird graph of holocausts. Sounds like an important comparative tool. But I've never seen this mystifying format before. A couple of explanatory paragraphs are requested.
Glad you said that. I was thinking that they must make sense to somebody, but I sure was not seeing it.
See reply to Billy
That's a cumulative area chart. Each color represents a single genocide of +2 million stacked on top of each other so that the total height along the x-axis represents total genocide victims.
But you have seen the format before, because you made the same request last time I posted this chart. I shamefully neglected to follow up. What should I add to make it more explanatory? It is a powerful chart and I want people to understand what it is showing
Maybe put it into a layman’s simple bar graph. Those are straight forward and easy to read.
Then we lose the time aspect. Showing the cumulative total as the century progresses helps illustrate first, that not only were Jews the most murderous people of the 20th Century (and per capita, they are off the charts), but they are the ones who kicked off the century of genocide; and, second, it's much easier to see that Nazism was a response to Bolshevism.
Ok, I’ll stop being lazy 🤪
Thanks for that, but still not happy w/ this chart. He accepts figures v the Nazis that are unfair. Both the 6M re Jews and 11M v Europeans are unlikely. Are the 6M part of the 11M? Every colored line/official count could be questioned especially since it's dealing w/ millions.
I suspect the naming of Jews in any but victim categories is not the prof's doing but yours. I'm not knocking it. It's inclusive. Just trying to keep the perspective real in terms of an official/academic graph.
I notice the most recent genocide listed is Cambodian v Cambodian, but the perps were Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge. 2.5 seems an arbitrary threshold, especially when the captured population is limited itself as w/ the Cambodians. PP managed to wipe out a quarter of his people.
The gradually inclining lines in many cases are not warranted because the particular genocide ended years earlier. They should level off. It creates a bulk impression which is undue. Seems a flaw inherent in the format.
The lines continue to increase gradually (but in parallel) because people were still being killed in the Soviet Union until 1987. Also, you have to put the threshold somewhere. I chose 2 million as the cutoff for a "major" slaughter. Granted, it's arbitrary, but necessarily so. I used the prof's data for the number of victims (for which he seems careful and judicious) and the time periods. The labels are mine. I could have called the German Nazis European Christians or Christian fascists if I wanted. I chose labels that would heighten the distinctions, e.g., European Jews vs Bolshevik Jews. I took the figures for the Nazis--unfair as they may be--as presented only because I want the emphasis to be on how, either way, the Holocaust is dwarfed by the holocausts. I want people to ask, "How come we don't know about these?" "Why is the Holocaust somehow special?" Once people ask those questions, their journey to the light has begun. :)
Fair enough from your earlier perspective. If one can read the chart, one can see what you say.
I think old school leftists don't fall for "eternal victims" or "6M must be obeyed". They recognize those tropes as religiously based. What they do fall for is Hitler was evil and what happened to the Jews during WW2 was a humanitarian tragedy. They also believe in the gas chambers. (Normies always believe in them too.) I think the liberal's stance is an ideological preference for communism over fascism which insulates them from inconvenient facts about the implausibility of the H. They won't read Revisionist literature because they feel it's going to exonerate Hitler and Nazis.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-148585975?source=queue
Christian Nationalists: America’s Taliban in Disguise
The Unholy Crusade to Erase Rights, Crush Dissent, and Drag Us Backwards
The whole "Jehovah" pagan conspiracy bullshit is getting tiring.
They don't follow the God of the Bible, they follow Moloch, aka Saturn, aka Satan.
Just look at your own quote from the Protocols of Zion:
"A world coalition of Gentiles could cope with us temporarily, but we are assured against this by roots of dissension among them so deep that they cannot be torn out. We have created antagonism between the personal and national interests of the Gentiles by arousing religious and race hatreds which we have nourished in their hearts for twenty centuries."
Well, what happened twenty centuries ago that made them start plotting against us? We all know the answer.
As for our polity, calling ourselves gentiles or goyim, even though I occasionally do it, is actually using their terminology for our own identity, which is psychologically damaging in the long term. We should just call ourselves Mankind United and the jews the Plutocrats or Parasites, the Anti-Humans, Vampires, etc. See my Synarchist Manifesto (link in bio) for a proposed strategy for a coalition of this kind.
The Hart-Celler Act is a product of the Judeo-Gentile coalition. Solely blaming Jews for mass-migration is disingenuous.
White Nationalism is a secular movement with no economic policy. For some peculiar reason White Nationalists seem to overlook the ramifications of a secular culture. For example: we now have state sponsored sodomy for an entire month of the year.
That being said, I agree with the other fundamental points of the article. Regardless of how demoralizing it is.
Scripture isn't Jewish, it comes from the Israelites, who were/are White people. The Christian destiny tells us we had it all and will lose it, but fight back with our God's help to save our race from destruction. The Talmud teaches the Jews that we are dumb animals over whom they will be slave masters. Two completely different cultures/people/dutures. As for nations, I prefer Francis Parker Yockey's definition in his book, Imperium. Nations are subdivisions within a culture (racial) in which the members have a shared history of blood and soil who are maintained by a state for political purpose. They may wrestle for control of the culture's direction, but they do not, or should not annihilate each other. This only became possible because of the Enlightenment and the outsider Jews having a huge part in redirecting our culture through their control of the leading nation or nations here in Western Christian Culture/Civilization at any given time. Taking hold of England under Cromwell was a huge win for them, especially as England would become the standard bearer of liberalism and capitalism. They jumped ship to the USA and USSR, while steering England into the position it is now, overwhelmed by outlanders and no longer an empire. They have already steered the US and Russia towards self-destruction in the 100 years they've dominated each politically as they now have Kike Central in Palestine, and Kike Central is right in the middle of the political world .... Eurasia/Africa. The Western Hemisphere has a quarter of the people and resources by comparison, and the US is going down the shithole in a slow motion civil war while new third world recruits are being brought in by the millions to finish the job.
https://youtu.be/WKHdyhmolMw?si=jPDcta94D-3yQD2e
For those who think you can’t unhook the Old Testament from the New Testament
As a normie but untriggered observer of political extremism, the main point I always make to antisemitic right is “don’t you see the fundamental similarity between what you accuse Jews of doing and what you want white people to be doing to non-whites? In both cases, complete indifference or hostility to outsiders. Hyper-nationalism for me but not for thee. At best, WN want to arrange reservations for blacks, or maybe a boat ride back to Africa at gunpoint. They argue about how big the boat should be and whether or not blacks should have to pay for it. Right wing ant-semitism strikes me as a perverted form of Jew envy. Your hatred for them is matched only by your desire to imitate them.
No, I don't think you are correct.
WN culture says we should treat our neighbor like we treat our brother and the stranger like we treat our neighbor. Jewish culture says if you lend money to another Jew, don't charge interest, but charge interest from a gentile, and eventually you will own everything in their country.
WN culture says we should use our language to communicate our intent. Jewish culture says when you approach a city to take possession of it, cry "Peace, peace." If the people of the city believe you and open their gates to you, enslave them. If the city resists, lay siege and when you have broken the defenses, kill all the males and enslave the women and children.
The white nationalists want to be left alone to build communities among their own kind, raise their children according to their cultural norms, have a border that is respected, and establish institutions and policies that will benefit them and their descendants rather than be turned into weapons against them.
Jews want to rule a slave-world in which Jews are the master race--a kind of priestly over-class--and everyone else is there to serve them. Zionism has reignited a vulgar chauvinism within the breast of the Jew that thrills to the very idea of that. These aren't normies.
No one is trying to imitate you. The rest of the world recognizes you for the depraved, dangerous, untrustworthy, insatiable, subversive menace that you are. We would rather just be rid of the Judaic infection..
You might be right about the hatred though. Some people are just hateworthy.
Never heard of a WN who objected to non white nationalism.
I've also never heard of a Unit 8200-type calling himself a "normie."
Well you have the phenomenon of white nationalists who want to see the end of Israel and also want to expel Jews from America and other white countries.
You can't blame anyone for wanting to expel the Jews. No one wants to host a parasite that's killing them. But I have never heard anyone advocate expelling the Jews in the manner the Jews are "expelling " the Palestinians from their native land.
As for "want to see the end of Israel," why don't you speak plainly? Do you mean they want the US to stop letting Israel and Israelis soak us every year for hundreds of billions of dollars in cash, military stockpiles, one-sided contracts, and plain ol' fraud? Is that what you mean by "the end of Israel?" If so, then I agree with the WN. I'd like to see the end of Israel, too.