Jews are the only people on the planet who want it to be illegal to dislike them. They're also the only people on the planet who torture children, so...
As others have said, another beautifully written and sanguine post, Craig.
I felt at a loss for words after reading it a couple of days ago... but it is still resonating with me.
I was reminded of your work when I watched this video tonight... it came out 5 years ago, but its message rings as true as ever. Well worth the 19 minutes of your time if you need a reminder of why those of us here do what we do:
Jim Kunstler, an American jew, calls out all the jews behind all the Lawfare, chaos and destruction of the US in his latest article. Very rare. Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?
I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with Kunstler. He's a great writer, and often makes scathingly accurate social commentaries. But almost every time I read him, I get little reminders that he is a Jew first and foremost.
He tells the truth often - but he also lies by omission. I can never tell if such people are self-deceived, or just really good at sharing just enough truth to keep us under their spell. Or both.
Indeed, I feel the same way. I just found it very unusual and interesting for a jew to call out other jews who are doing despicable things as "jews." It happens so rarely as to be practically nonexistent and made me immediately wonder what his angle could possibly be.
Some do so when they are under the impression that the others have gone too far. The problem is that they waited too long to protect themselves because they profit from the Synagogue of satan's machinations.
The shekel is more important than self preservation (much less decency).
I think the jews are all indoctrinated with their mother’s milk to stick together, no matter what. To always cover for a fellow jew, regardless of their reprehensible conduct or whether you hate them on a personal level, on pain of being made an outcast and excommunicated from the tribe. Just do some research on how they kept each other in line back in the shtetl days and keep in mind that today’s “secular” jews are only a couple generations removed from the "observant” judaism of their grandparents and/or great-grandparents.
I'm no judaism expert, but I understand that it is basically illegal for a jew to accuse a jew of wrongdoing... UNLESS they are screwing over other jews. Anyone else is ok. Encouraged, even.
It seems to even permeate down thru secular jews, so is it nature or nurture?
Yes, true. I recall after the Madoff scandal broke seeing stories and discussions about how horrible it was that he screwed over so many fellow jews, implying that screwing over the jews was wrong, but screwing over the goyim was not. (Not sure how many goy directly lost money with Madoff, it seemed to be a jews-only enterprise.)
Jews always try to get in front of every movement to control it to their benefit, if one is starting to talk about antisemitism, then he's probably trying to mislead it to a harmless position.
Kunstler wasn't just talking about "antisemitism," he was actually committing "antisemitism" by calling out jews by name as "jews." Read the article, if you haven't already.
Yeah, he's calling out some particular Jews as a disgrace, not the fundamental issue of Jewish power in gentile nations. I'm sure if some "good Jews" we're in those positions, he wouldn't have a problem.
When Jews start talking about jewishness the same way hyper liberals whites (and ("whites") talk about whiteness, I'll start believing they're being honest.
It's plain in Kunstler's writings that he has nothing but contempt for us. Further, he never points the finger at his tribe for the ugliness he constantly moans about. Load him on a boxcar with the rest of them.
Kunstler has been bashing Whites for decades for what jews have been doing. That's dishonest. One article last month blaming a tiny handful of jews doesn't cut it. I know of one or two jew writers/commentators who have been forthright about what jews have been up to and they are Ron Unz and perhaps Nate Kapner. Whites need to stop being so conciliatory and should start holding jews accountable for their lies and destruction.
A timely reminder of no matter how many distractions we are afforded, the baseness of evil is alive and well.
We can lose ourselves in infinite playthings provided by our computers, but the physical and spiritual worlds are quite captured via the electronically-induced apathy of such overwhelming amounts of information, much of it ultimately useless, mere fill for a false comfort-bringing pillow.
It's shapinng up to be an exceptionally vicious wakeup call. We who understand human nature and history are at least forewarned.
P.S. I left a note several weeks ago in a previous article's thread which made reference to the tragedy of combining Judeo with Christian re: the Christian Bible back in the 5th century, I believe.
I could have sworn I read the story of that event itself in one of the first posts I saw from this site.
I wrote on the "Chains of Zion" thread:
"When that group of theologians—God experts—met in the 5th century AD and decided to attach the Hebrew Torah to the Christian Testament and pronounce them of “equal divine authority,” it was a blunder of cataclysmic proportions."
I was looking for the subject matter (essay) of the quote above, I thought it was something you had previously written which I read here. I perused closely trying to find a hyperlink directing me to it without success, and then went through the archives trying to find it, ultimately ending up here in my attempt to find it again.
Was it just my imagination that I originally read it here?
I recall being mightily impressed by it and wanted to use it in convincing my immediate family that our larger problem is to be traced to just that place in time.
Any help to be had in tracking it down? Or did I just imagine it?
Hi David, The comments on this post mention a theologian named Marcion who rejected the Old Testament in the 2nd century AD. Could this be what you were thinking of?
Once you've opened the link above, type [control]+[f] to bring up the search function at the bottom of your screen, and type in "marcion". You should get 13 matches. See in particular one of the comments from Ashowa from October 2.
To anybody who has actually familiarized themselves with the Bible, the idea that the two can be unhooked is just silly, as the New Testament is replete with quotes and references from the Old Testament. Further, books like Enoch, which is not in any of our modern Catholic or Protestant versions, is liberally quoted from. And that book is the one that clearly expounds on Genesis 6:4 and the idea of Angel - human hybrids.
Attempts to divorce the Old Testament from the NT, or Paul from Jesus, are typically from people driving an agenda, who’s audience are woefully ignorant of the details, and easily persuaded with great ,swelling, and wordy arguments.
Enoch 1:Chapter 1:6-7 is quoted by the Apostle Peter in 2 Pet 3:10
Enoch 10: 6-7 is the FIRST mention of the judgment followed by those cast into the lake of fire…and afterwards mentioned throughout scripture.
Enoch Chapter 19:1-3 is FIRST mention of what evil spirits (demons) will do concerning the causing of man to worship ‘other gods’ which are really demons and not gods at all. Hence the coming of paganism in Babylon (where this was accomplished), the ‘mythical gods’ of Greece and Rome throughout history (even to this day), and spoken of by the apostle Paul in 1 Cor 10:19-20.
Enoch Chapter 38:1 is mentioned by Y’Shua in Mt 25:32-34 and 41.
Enoch chapter 39:1-3 is the first reference to what occurs in Rev:4-8
Enoch chapter 40 is the FIRST mention of what occurs in Rev 5:11
Enoch chapter 46:2-3 is the FIRST mention of “the Son of Man”
Enoch chapter 47:3, is the FIRST mention of The Book of Life, mentioned later by Y’shua, in the book of Philippians as well as in the book of Revelation.
Enoch 62:11 is quoted in Romans 2:11
Enoch chapter 48:4 is quoted by Isaiah in Isa 42:6
Enoch 48:7 is the FIRST mention of salvation “in his name”. A theme being repeated often by the Apostles (although most religions fail to understand what it means to be ‘in his name’).
Enoch 22:10,12 is quoted in Luke 16:26
Enoch chapter 51:1 is spoken of by Y’shua in John 5:28-29
Enoch chapter 84:2 is mentioned again in Acts 7:49
Enoch chapter 91:6-7 is a theme repeated throughout the entire bible, first mentioned in the Book of Enoch.
Enoch 45:3 is quoted in Mt 25: 31-32 and John 14:2.
Enoch 94:8 is quoted by the Apostle James in Jas 5:1-3
The scenario first spoken of in Enoch 10:15,16 …was used for the basis of Jude6, 2 Pet 2:4 and Rev 20:10
Enoch 92:17 is fulfilled in Rev 22:1
Enoch 61:4-9 is fulfilled in 2 Thess 1:9, 1 Thess 5:3, 2 Thess 2:8 and Mt 25:31.....a list a friend complied showing the connections of Enoch to the Brit h'dasha
Thank you so very much for this scholarly effort. It is crucially important to reveal and disclose these deeply and gravely impugning details that demonstrate the actual and factual bases of the Abrahamic faiths.
I think the story of the old Bolshevik being interrogated by the young Stalinist is known as Red Symphony. It nicely fleshes out the rift between the Trotskyist faction vs the Stalinists w/n the original Bolsheviks. Whether or not the event actually happened as depicted is questionable.
The Trotskyites became Zionists and later morphed into today's neocons. And their intra-Jewish feud has been reignited over Gaza, whereby the Trots/neocons defend Israel's slaughter of Palestinians and the old school Bolshies call them out for their genocide.
One can make temporary alliance w/ the old schoolers, but be aware they're still commies at heart..
I think having just read your post, this has been the most chilling thing I've read in a long, long time. I may well repost it to my own Substack. What is coming home to me more and more (besides everything else) as atrocities in Occupied Palestine accumulate... those hideous events in Bolshevik Russia... Those aren't and weren't aberrations. They're the norm. This is what Jews do, whenever they gain sufficient power – or even sufficient leverage: Mass murder inevitably follows. I remember in the late 1970s, first year University and our English History Prof, a Polish Emigre, and what she had to say about the Communist government in Poland, what they did. Or what my ex-wife's parents had to tell me when they were finally able to leave China, about the Cultural Revolution, the 100 Flowers or the Great Leap Forward. All these things, the direct result of Jewish thought, Jewish subversion. And now they're at the Helm of Western Civilization and ... is there anything they hate more, than Christianity, or the civilization it engendered?
But to paraphrase Frodo's remark about Sauron: "What do they not hate?" 😥
" ... is there anything they hate more, than Christianity, or the civilization it engendered?"
They most certainly do NOT hate Christianity! Christianity was their weapon of theological conquest, first of Rome, then of European civilization, whom they equate with Edom. Many rabbis openly, brazenly talk about how America and Christianity and the Christian West are Edom and they're going to be destroyed.
We must face the reality that Christianity is not only rooted in Judaism, it is a vast Jewish stratagem.
TL;DR: Jesus was the vehicle to sell Noahide laws to the goyim.
It very much appears that Paul, a devout Jew, never actually intended to found a new religion, and he certainly didn't purpose to abrogate the law. Rather, he wanted to reinforce Torah law and to revive Jewish observance. Furthermore, Jesus is not the founder of Christianity, the founding of which is most likely to have been Paul. However in the book of Acts Paul and James say that they should teach the Gentiles what are essentially the Noahide laws (without actually using the word "Noahide"). Acts 15 is basically the Noahide laws for the goyim. Spreading the Noahide laws for the Gentile world is what their mission was, to spread Jewish laws of morality.
In the first century AD there was no new religion called Christianity. However there were Jews in Judea that just happened to believe that the Messiah had come. Josephus mentions a number of people who are the Messiah and that there were a number of messianic movements in the first century. The movement that later became know Christianity one was just one of the first century messianic movements. Christianity cannot be seen to have truly started until the fourth century, by the Council of Nicaea. Christianity by that state can be seen to have already evolved and morphed with Roman beliefs as it spread among Gentiles among pagan Romans and Greeks. The Jews never bought into the Christian thing because they knew the sources of Christianity, and they knew the Torah. The Jews knew Christianity was all fan fiction of the Torah with a mystical rabbi such as the one from Daniel 7 and Isaiah 52 53 and Zachariah.
The idea of Jesus as a mythical celestial suffering Messiah had spread to non-Jewish communities that didn't know Torah, but were used to the pagan gods and heroes. Which is why they could adopt these ideas and wouldn't refute another demigod because they already knew others such as Hercules. This is how Christianity could spread over the next few hundred years. And while it spread, it took on all these pagan elements (the Trinity, for instance, which the Jews do actually despise). The point of this whole Jesus thing was not Mashiach because Yahweh did not need another to exist and be the cause of a massive movement. Instead what the rabbi Moses ben Maimon said is that ultimately Christianity played the important role in spreading basic Torah fundamentals around the world and knowledge of Tanakh - the Old Testament - and knowledge of God, of Hashem, and spreading knowledge of the concept of Mashiach and the concept of divine law. Christianity had that important role to play. It was ultimately the Jewish mission to spread "godliness" to the world and Christians helped them in that endeavor to bring the Torah to the world.
If you want to believe that, go ahead and believe it. Throughout the Gospels Jesus condemns the Pharisees and Sadducees in no uncertain terms; they in turn plotted to murder him. Moreover Christianity was anathematized and expelled from Judaism in the latter half of the 1st century. The Romans from Nero onwards (middle of the first century) distinguished between the Jews and the Christians and persecuted the latter. And yes, the Jews DO hate Christianity, and they hate Gentiles, viz:
"The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, Baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al, don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself.
— Susan Sontag
"When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is not to win over more whites to oppose “racism”; there are “anti-racists” enough already to do the job. The task is to gather together a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white. It is a strategy of creative provocation.”
— Noel Ignatiev
"A religion based upon the principle of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” might have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past."
— Ron Unz
The Talmud specifically teaches that Jesus' mother was a whore, his father a Roman Centurion, that he is in the bottom circle of Hell in a cauldron of boiling excrement; furthermore that Christianity is "Avodah Zarah" and all followers must die.
And you are at liberty to continue to be deceived by Jewish deceptions.
Thanks for the links - I have already read the Ron Unz articles before you shared them. I'd gladly share my reading list with you, if I had any reason to believe you'd follow up the titles and actually read them. The problem is that the authors in my reading list tear the entire Jesus and Christianity fraud to pieces and it's my experience that Christians aren't in the business of challenging their faith with countervailing facts.
Jesus was a Jewish invention, a fabrication. He is a midrashic myth created by a first century mystical Jewish sect. There is zero archaeological evidence of Jesus. There is not a shard or artifact of any kind that could be construed as evidence of Jesus. The gospels are in no way proof of the existence of Jesus. In fact, the way the gospels came about is almost comical.
The earliest mentions of Jesus are Paul’s letters, written around 50–60 AD, two decades after the Jesus' death. The Acts of the Apostles records three apparitions of Jesus received by Paul: Paul’s Vision on the Road to Damascus (Acts 9, 22, and 26), Paul’s Trance in the Temple (Acts 22:17-21), and Paul’s Vision in Prison (Acts 23:11). I'll restate that: Paul never met Jesus - he had visions of Jesus. So we have the first mentions of Jesus as a result of the recurring visions of a hallucinator, possibly a schizophrenic one.
Mark is generally considered the earliest gospel, written around 65–70 AD, followed by Matthew and Luke in the 80s or 90s AD. John might also make it into the 1st century, as it’s usually dated to around 90–100 AD. The first of the four Gospels, by Mark, was written another two decades after Paul’s writings. If the Jesus was crucified at age 33 as is claimed (a commonly used number from Jewish numerology, for example, King David ruled in Jerusalem for 33 years, 33 miracles were performed by Jesus, the 33 elements including the whole and all its constituent parts in the Sephiroth of the Kabbalah, etc.), at his death in AD 28-30 (his birth occurred between 5 and 6 BC), and if it is assumed that Mark was of similar age at the time, somehow Mark finally got the itch to write about the Earth-shattering event that was the life of the Jesus and his divine awesomeness when Mark was into his 70s. What was he doing that was more important from the time he was hanging with the Messiah that delayed him from writing about The Son of God?
Furthermore, that 'Jesus Christ.' or cognate names, wasn't mentioned by most historians and chroniclers of the time, is conspicuous also in that historians and protagonists in history in the past, as they do in the present, will tend to credit each other. As Jesus ostensibly performed miracles of global expanse (e.g. Mathew 27), his words going “unto the ends of the whole world” (Romans 10), one would expect virtually every literate person on earth to record those events during his time. Any Jesus contemporary should have done so, but they did not, and we only have Paul's visions and the suddenly remembered chronicles of Jesus' life after a forty or so year gap appearing as the gospels. You have got to be kidding me.
Yeah, well, whatever. I provided you other links besides Mr. Unz: The Asha Logos videos for example. There is also not a shred of evidence for the myths in the Torah, of the Jews (pardon me, "Hebrews") being enslaved in Egypt, of God visiting plagues upon the Egyptians, nor of the Exodus. There's a lot of doubt about the conquest of Canaan, of the existence of Moses, David or Solomon. The "Jewish never existed" patter was a conceit of some 19th Century scholars long put to rest. The vast majority of academics – far better informed than me – have no doubt as to Jesus' existence; as for nothing being know about him? How many people from 2,000 years ago do we have any record of? Meanwhile a lot of people think Mohammed made up Islam out of whole cloth. I wouldn't try persuading a convinced Muslim of this if I were you. Finally if you want to send me your list of titles, by all means.
Strange coincidence, I only just watched the Asha Logos video, No More Sidelines, a few days before this discussion began. It's very good, and both dismaying and uplifting at the same time but for different reasons. I may need to watch it again because I came away from watching it with a distinct impression that the narrator spoke of God and the divine from a Christian perspective. But because monotheism became the only religious belief allowed soon after Christianization (though monotheism was conceived by the Zoroastrians, only the worship of the Jewish-Christian god was permitted), and despite Chistianity's efforts to separate Jesus from god (Yahweh), the fact remains that the god of Christianity was and still is Yahweh. This being so, the narrator or indeed anyone imploring or soliciting god is passively endorsing the Jewish concept of divinity, in which case the video No More Sidelines and the objectives it purports to pursue is working at cross purposes.
"The vast majority of academics – far better informed than me – have no doubt as to Jesus' existence; as for nothing being know about him?"
I don't know which academics ypu are referring to nor which is their field of expertise, however I do suspect that if their pay check depends on them sustaining a narrative, they are unlikely to oppose it.
"How many people from 2,000 years ago do we have any record of?"
That depends on who they were and what agenda, historical and in the present day, are contingent upon those people from 2,000 years ago existing. A vast web of institutions and establishment purposes are predicated upon this notion of Jesus and the disparaging of, or even contempt for this life in favor of the next.
Anyhow, here's my reading list:
Thomas Römer, The Invention of God, Harvard UP, 2015
Hyam Maccoby, The Sacred Executioner, Thames & Hudson, 1982.
Laurent Guyénot, Our God Is Your God Too, But He Has Chosen Us: Essays on Jewish Power, AFNIL, 2020.
Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World, Mariner Books, 2018
David Fitzgerald, Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed at All, Lulu.com, 2010
Also by David Fitzgerald, Jesus Mything In Action, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017
Robert M Price, Deconstructing Jesus, Prometheus, 2000
Paula Fredriksen, Paul: The Pagans' Apostle, Yale University Press, 2017
Richard Carrier, On the Historicity of Jesus, Why We Might Have Reason For Doubt, Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014
Randel Helms, Gospel Fictions, Prometheus, 1989
Russell E.] Gmirkin, Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuch, T&T Clark, 2006 - which described how they fabricated the New Testament in Pesher style (an approach to Biblical interpretation, found most notably in the Dead Sea Scrolls) from connecting scripture of the Old Testament
As the stories, the reality of, come out, we begin to realise. And that realisation freezes us. Only this time, they have technology. Raw power. It's why people are afraid. But we also have to face the truth. The jew it seems, appears capable of using whatever's at hand. Semitic or anti-semitic. And they appear to be behind it all.
I kind of hate reading your writing. It's evocative, brutal, brilliant, the truth and entirely too flipping nasty. But these realities need to be exposed. This one hit home.
You are absolutely correct on this. The Jewish Bolsheviks. The fact that they were largely Jews has conveniently been omitted from modern history. I have only recently become aware of this.
When you weed your garden, do you care that some complain of your cruelty to sentience? If you do, the weeds will overtake you as surely as will starving wolves. But weeds will consume you, blamelessly, from the inside.
So you like Solzhenitsyn’s reminiscent proactive suggestions of “if we just” (if we just killed them before they killed us, essentially is what he is saying). And you made the great point of showing that once the situation gets that far along, that it’s really too late. So would it be fair to assume that you think that being proactive (kill them before they kill you) LONG before the situation makes it almost impossible, would be the logical thing to do (since it’s quite obvious by now that neither voting nor personal appeals amount to much)? And if we go that far, killing them proactively is really another word for genocide or cleansing, am I right? Kill or be killed. Maybe Jehovah was on to something about eradicating certain communities right down to the family pets. Now you think it was a marching order for the Jews against the gentiles - here is where we disagree. I think it was against the half human hybrids that live among us, that look like us, eat like us, breed like us, go poop like us, but are not us. The Tares among the wheat (Matthew 13). And it’s those whom Jesus points out in Revelation, “ that call themselves Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan”. Imposters. And it’s what Chucky is unintentionally pointing to (see chucky’s comment) by sharing that bit about Kunstler. Even the average mindf**ked Jew is finally beginning to notice that something is not right, something is quite wrong.
And I know you poo poo the idea of non human entities among us, but I will make the case that what I see is that humanity is always being undermined and sabotaged. If you and I (presuming you are human), were to sit down together for a cup of coffee, and we were given the task of solving ….let’s say world hunger …., then in spite of whatever is different about us, we could hammer out a plan to accomplish it (provided we had the authority to manage the abundant resources of the flat plane we live on). But no, there is a force at work against whatever is good, which I think is non human. And further, I think humans can be absorbed into that hive by their immoral and unethical behavior, which transforms them from the inside out.
Humans generally want to be left alone to go about creating and enjoying life. Yes, we are infected with a selfishness that must be changed, which is a transformation that only Christ can initiate.
The story of the wedding party reminded me of George Soros, who at one time bragged about helping the Nazis seize the property of people who were being sent to concentration camps. He admitted it was the best time of his life, as I recall. Not all evil doers lament what they have done; some go on to do even more evil deeds until they die. For them, the evil oozes out of every pore and never seems to go away.
I also wonder whether the story about the train prompted the authors of the series "Yellowstone" to describe the Duttons' taking one of their enemies away to die as taking them to the "train station". Probably just a coincidence.
I'm reading an interesting book titled, "From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land...Clash of Civilizations," by Laurent Guyénot. It's a history of the Jews that helps, for me, to explain their behavior. Not a flattering account.
You know what Soros' job was specifically? As a 14-year-old, he accompanied the Nazis into the homes of Jews and helped catalogue the belongings as they were being taken away. Kind of odd, no? Why would you care what belonged to people you were just going to kill, anyway? Why not do like the Bolsheviks did to the Christians--just load the people into trucks and take them to the edge of town and shoot them and take whatever stuff of theirs you wanted?
The reason the Nazis, with Soros' help, kept records of what belonged to whom was because, after the war, the plan was that the Jews would go to Israel and import their stuff from Germany. In other words, no extermination plan. But the Germans are still paying reparations.
My blood froze imagining these scenes and recognizing the equivalences in our present circumstances. The soundest remedy for this perturbation with terror is appropriate action. What to do?
Don’t think jehova is on the side of bolsheviks. If anything, the text was adulterated by priests in favor of plunder, mass murder and rape. Don’t think jehovas Ten Commandments condone the Jews behavior.
The Levites who wrote Deuteronomy left in the Ten Commandments for unknown reasons. Every one of them except the one about having no other gods before me is abrogated in the following pages. "Thou shalt not kill," is cancelled repeatedly by Jehovah's exhortations to genocide entire cities..
A very grim story. This morning I got another post from one Toni Airaksinen, who has just converted to Judaism... 🤨 Personally I would have been far happier to learn she'd converted to Catholicism or better, The Church of England, but I digress. In this post she details the misfortune – although she does not phrase it thus – of Dr. Yasmeen Hanoosh (https://toniairaksinen.substack.com/p/arabic-prof-on-leave-claims-i-am), a professor of Arabic at Portland State University who has made a possible fatal misstep in publicly stating her loyalties... One of her followers (?) "Good Humor by CK Steefel" commented "Send her to Gaza." I replied "She's from Iraq. She doesn't need to visit Gaza" to which Ms. Steffel replied "Send her back to Iraq", to which I in turn replied "I suspect you'll eventually get your wish... 🤔"
She gave me a "like" for that... 🙄
... Thus a few hours later I added: "As a corollary to my earlier statement that you liked: Once Donald gets Bibi's "Antisemite Legislation" passed expect a whole bunch of us to get "deep-sixed"... 😱 "What's a Gentile to Do?" https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/whats-a-gentile-to-do
I imagine Ms. Steffel will eventually block me. Hopefully that's all she'll do. Meanwhile, as a resident of Woke Canuckistan, why am I worrying about Bibi/Donald's "Antisemitic Legislation"? Mark Carnage is resurrecting Justin Castreau's On-Line Harms Act; when that happens I could be facing life imprisonment for what amounts to "Thought Crime"... I need hardly add "Antisemitism" will figure prominently in the courts' judgments...
"And the last state of that man, was worse than the first." (Gospel of Matthew, 12:45)
As others have said, another beautifully written and sanguine post, Craig.
I felt at a loss for words after reading it a couple of days ago... but it is still resonating with me.
I was reminded of your work when I watched this video tonight... it came out 5 years ago, but its message rings as true as ever. Well worth the 19 minutes of your time if you need a reminder of why those of us here do what we do:
"No More Sidelines. Rise Up White Man"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPKqZ5b3Haji/
I just saw this and have listened to other videos by the same maker. He is an absolute genius. he seems to have disappeared. If so a tragedy.
Video unavailable in the UK :-(
Darn! Try these two links. Let me know if one of them works. (I think the first one is actually better resolution than the link I originally posted.)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MBd00a0jjcOX
https://odysee.com/@thisworldworks:1/no-more-sidelines.rise-up-white-man:e
Thanks very much👍
(You may like this latest ep. Was removed from YT).
https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/Royal-Scythian-Gothic-Connection:5?r=ANvRDiZVkFvDK4ZTVwA8d3C7hMncpiPY
Thanks Pauline! Looking forward to checking it out.
The story of the doomed wedding party is hauntingly evocative and very thought provoking....
Dostoevsky is a feast. Any people who can produce a Dostoevsky are natural and permanent allies.
Wonderful sentiments👏👏👏
Beautifully written.
Jim Kunstler, an American jew, calls out all the jews behind all the Lawfare, chaos and destruction of the US in his latest article. Very rare. Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?
https://jameshowardkunstler.substack.com/p/lawfare-is-jihad-against-our-country
I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with Kunstler. He's a great writer, and often makes scathingly accurate social commentaries. But almost every time I read him, I get little reminders that he is a Jew first and foremost.
He tells the truth often - but he also lies by omission. I can never tell if such people are self-deceived, or just really good at sharing just enough truth to keep us under their spell. Or both.
Indeed, I feel the same way. I just found it very unusual and interesting for a jew to call out other jews who are doing despicable things as "jews." It happens so rarely as to be practically nonexistent and made me immediately wonder what his angle could possibly be.
Save his own skin
Doesn't mean a thing, Chucky.
The latter, probably ( it’s more ‘fun’ for the perpetrator and that gives with the outsider).
Hi Anna:
Read my note to Chucky I just posted above your comment.
Cheers, Capt. Roy Harkness
"Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?"
At this point, it is too late. They should have stopped it long ago.
You missed my point. It’s very rare to hear a jew call out other jews specifically by name and as "jews." I was speculating as to why.
I'm not being critical. Just an observation.
Some do so when they are under the impression that the others have gone too far. The problem is that they waited too long to protect themselves because they profit from the Synagogue of satan's machinations.
The shekel is more important than self preservation (much less decency).
I think the jews are all indoctrinated with their mother’s milk to stick together, no matter what. To always cover for a fellow jew, regardless of their reprehensible conduct or whether you hate them on a personal level, on pain of being made an outcast and excommunicated from the tribe. Just do some research on how they kept each other in line back in the shtetl days and keep in mind that today’s “secular” jews are only a couple generations removed from the "observant” judaism of their grandparents and/or great-grandparents.
I'm no judaism expert, but I understand that it is basically illegal for a jew to accuse a jew of wrongdoing... UNLESS they are screwing over other jews. Anyone else is ok. Encouraged, even.
It seems to even permeate down thru secular jews, so is it nature or nurture?
Yes, true. I recall after the Madoff scandal broke seeing stories and discussions about how horrible it was that he screwed over so many fellow jews, implying that screwing over the jews was wrong, but screwing over the goyim was not. (Not sure how many goy directly lost money with Madoff, it seemed to be a jews-only enterprise.)
Have you read "The Lord of the Rings", Chucky? Gildor Inglorion's words of warning to Frodo?
"Is it not enough to know that they are servants of The Enemy? Flee them! Speak no words to them! They are deadly."
PS Asha Logos' presentation is timely: Our Fight Against the Malevolent Hatred of the 'Eternal Rebel' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCNr1-yQzl0&t=356s
Jews always try to get in front of every movement to control it to their benefit, if one is starting to talk about antisemitism, then he's probably trying to mislead it to a harmless position.
Kunstler wasn't just talking about "antisemitism," he was actually committing "antisemitism" by calling out jews by name as "jews." Read the article, if you haven't already.
Yeah, he's calling out some particular Jews as a disgrace, not the fundamental issue of Jewish power in gentile nations. I'm sure if some "good Jews" we're in those positions, he wouldn't have a problem.
When Jews start talking about jewishness the same way hyper liberals whites (and ("whites") talk about whiteness, I'll start believing they're being honest.
It's plain in Kunstler's writings that he has nothing but contempt for us. Further, he never points the finger at his tribe for the ugliness he constantly moans about. Load him on a boxcar with the rest of them.
What are you talking about? He pointed his finger at his tribe in the article I linked. That was the whole point of my comment.
Kunstler has been bashing Whites for decades for what jews have been doing. That's dishonest. One article last month blaming a tiny handful of jews doesn't cut it. I know of one or two jew writers/commentators who have been forthright about what jews have been up to and they are Ron Unz and perhaps Nate Kapner. Whites need to stop being so conciliatory and should start holding jews accountable for their lies and destruction.
A timely reminder of no matter how many distractions we are afforded, the baseness of evil is alive and well.
We can lose ourselves in infinite playthings provided by our computers, but the physical and spiritual worlds are quite captured via the electronically-induced apathy of such overwhelming amounts of information, much of it ultimately useless, mere fill for a false comfort-bringing pillow.
It's shapinng up to be an exceptionally vicious wakeup call. We who understand human nature and history are at least forewarned.
P.S. I left a note several weeks ago in a previous article's thread which made reference to the tragedy of combining Judeo with Christian re: the Christian Bible back in the 5th century, I believe.
I could have sworn I read the story of that event itself in one of the first posts I saw from this site.
I wrote on the "Chains of Zion" thread:
"When that group of theologians—God experts—met in the 5th century AD and decided to attach the Hebrew Torah to the Christian Testament and pronounce them of “equal divine authority,” it was a blunder of cataclysmic proportions."
I was looking for the subject matter (essay) of the quote above, I thought it was something you had previously written which I read here. I perused closely trying to find a hyperlink directing me to it without success, and then went through the archives trying to find it, ultimately ending up here in my attempt to find it again.
Was it just my imagination that I originally read it here?
I recall being mightily impressed by it and wanted to use it in convincing my immediate family that our larger problem is to be traced to just that place in time.
Any help to be had in tracking it down? Or did I just imagine it?
Thanks for all you do.
Hi David, The comments on this post mention a theologian named Marcion who rejected the Old Testament in the 2nd century AD. Could this be what you were thinking of?
https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/odysseus-unsheathed/comments
Once you've opened the link above, type [control]+[f] to bring up the search function at the bottom of your screen, and type in "marcion". You should get 13 matches. See in particular one of the comments from Ashowa from October 2.
To anybody who has actually familiarized themselves with the Bible, the idea that the two can be unhooked is just silly, as the New Testament is replete with quotes and references from the Old Testament. Further, books like Enoch, which is not in any of our modern Catholic or Protestant versions, is liberally quoted from. And that book is the one that clearly expounds on Genesis 6:4 and the idea of Angel - human hybrids.
Attempts to divorce the Old Testament from the NT, or Paul from Jesus, are typically from people driving an agenda, who’s audience are woefully ignorant of the details, and easily persuaded with great ,swelling, and wordy arguments.
Enoch 94:8…was quoted in Luke 6:24
Enoch 108:12…was quoted in Mat 19:28
Enoch 38:2 was quoted in Mat 26:24
Enoch 27:1 was the basis of Luke 16:26
Enoch 41:2 mansions mentioned in John 14:2
Enoch 48:1 was the basis of John 4:13-14
Enoch 108:11 is quoted in John 12:36
Enoch 1:9 is quoted in Jude 1:14-15
Enoch 1:3-4 is prophesied again in Isaiah 42:13
Enoch 1:Chapter 1:6-7 is quoted by the Apostle Peter in 2 Pet 3:10
Enoch 10: 6-7 is the FIRST mention of the judgment followed by those cast into the lake of fire…and afterwards mentioned throughout scripture.
Enoch Chapter 19:1-3 is FIRST mention of what evil spirits (demons) will do concerning the causing of man to worship ‘other gods’ which are really demons and not gods at all. Hence the coming of paganism in Babylon (where this was accomplished), the ‘mythical gods’ of Greece and Rome throughout history (even to this day), and spoken of by the apostle Paul in 1 Cor 10:19-20.
Enoch Chapter 38:1 is mentioned by Y’Shua in Mt 25:32-34 and 41.
Enoch chapter 39:1-3 is the first reference to what occurs in Rev:4-8
Enoch chapter 40 is the FIRST mention of what occurs in Rev 5:11
Enoch chapter 46:2-3 is the FIRST mention of “the Son of Man”
Enoch chapter 47:3, is the FIRST mention of The Book of Life, mentioned later by Y’shua, in the book of Philippians as well as in the book of Revelation.
Enoch 62:11 is quoted in Romans 2:11
Enoch chapter 48:4 is quoted by Isaiah in Isa 42:6
Enoch 48:7 is the FIRST mention of salvation “in his name”. A theme being repeated often by the Apostles (although most religions fail to understand what it means to be ‘in his name’).
Enoch 22:10,12 is quoted in Luke 16:26
Enoch chapter 51:1 is spoken of by Y’shua in John 5:28-29
Enoch chapter 84:2 is mentioned again in Acts 7:49
Enoch chapter 91:6-7 is a theme repeated throughout the entire bible, first mentioned in the Book of Enoch.
Enoch 45:3 is quoted in Mt 25: 31-32 and John 14:2.
Enoch 94:8 is quoted by the Apostle James in Jas 5:1-3
The scenario first spoken of in Enoch 10:15,16 …was used for the basis of Jude6, 2 Pet 2:4 and Rev 20:10
Enoch 92:17 is fulfilled in Rev 22:1
Enoch 61:4-9 is fulfilled in 2 Thess 1:9, 1 Thess 5:3, 2 Thess 2:8 and Mt 25:31.....a list a friend complied showing the connections of Enoch to the Brit h'dasha
Thank you so very much for this scholarly effort. It is crucially important to reveal and disclose these deeply and gravely impugning details that demonstrate the actual and factual bases of the Abrahamic faiths.
I think the story of the old Bolshevik being interrogated by the young Stalinist is known as Red Symphony. It nicely fleshes out the rift between the Trotskyist faction vs the Stalinists w/n the original Bolsheviks. Whether or not the event actually happened as depicted is questionable.
The Trotskyites became Zionists and later morphed into today's neocons. And their intra-Jewish feud has been reignited over Gaza, whereby the Trots/neocons defend Israel's slaughter of Palestinians and the old school Bolshies call them out for their genocide.
One can make temporary alliance w/ the old schoolers, but be aware they're still commies at heart..
Jesus wept.
I think having just read your post, this has been the most chilling thing I've read in a long, long time. I may well repost it to my own Substack. What is coming home to me more and more (besides everything else) as atrocities in Occupied Palestine accumulate... those hideous events in Bolshevik Russia... Those aren't and weren't aberrations. They're the norm. This is what Jews do, whenever they gain sufficient power – or even sufficient leverage: Mass murder inevitably follows. I remember in the late 1970s, first year University and our English History Prof, a Polish Emigre, and what she had to say about the Communist government in Poland, what they did. Or what my ex-wife's parents had to tell me when they were finally able to leave China, about the Cultural Revolution, the 100 Flowers or the Great Leap Forward. All these things, the direct result of Jewish thought, Jewish subversion. And now they're at the Helm of Western Civilization and ... is there anything they hate more, than Christianity, or the civilization it engendered?
But to paraphrase Frodo's remark about Sauron: "What do they not hate?" 😥
" ... is there anything they hate more, than Christianity, or the civilization it engendered?"
They most certainly do NOT hate Christianity! Christianity was their weapon of theological conquest, first of Rome, then of European civilization, whom they equate with Edom. Many rabbis openly, brazenly talk about how America and Christianity and the Christian West are Edom and they're going to be destroyed.
We must face the reality that Christianity is not only rooted in Judaism, it is a vast Jewish stratagem.
TL;DR: Jesus was the vehicle to sell Noahide laws to the goyim.
It very much appears that Paul, a devout Jew, never actually intended to found a new religion, and he certainly didn't purpose to abrogate the law. Rather, he wanted to reinforce Torah law and to revive Jewish observance. Furthermore, Jesus is not the founder of Christianity, the founding of which is most likely to have been Paul. However in the book of Acts Paul and James say that they should teach the Gentiles what are essentially the Noahide laws (without actually using the word "Noahide"). Acts 15 is basically the Noahide laws for the goyim. Spreading the Noahide laws for the Gentile world is what their mission was, to spread Jewish laws of morality.
In the first century AD there was no new religion called Christianity. However there were Jews in Judea that just happened to believe that the Messiah had come. Josephus mentions a number of people who are the Messiah and that there were a number of messianic movements in the first century. The movement that later became know Christianity one was just one of the first century messianic movements. Christianity cannot be seen to have truly started until the fourth century, by the Council of Nicaea. Christianity by that state can be seen to have already evolved and morphed with Roman beliefs as it spread among Gentiles among pagan Romans and Greeks. The Jews never bought into the Christian thing because they knew the sources of Christianity, and they knew the Torah. The Jews knew Christianity was all fan fiction of the Torah with a mystical rabbi such as the one from Daniel 7 and Isaiah 52 53 and Zachariah.
The idea of Jesus as a mythical celestial suffering Messiah had spread to non-Jewish communities that didn't know Torah, but were used to the pagan gods and heroes. Which is why they could adopt these ideas and wouldn't refute another demigod because they already knew others such as Hercules. This is how Christianity could spread over the next few hundred years. And while it spread, it took on all these pagan elements (the Trinity, for instance, which the Jews do actually despise). The point of this whole Jesus thing was not Mashiach because Yahweh did not need another to exist and be the cause of a massive movement. Instead what the rabbi Moses ben Maimon said is that ultimately Christianity played the important role in spreading basic Torah fundamentals around the world and knowledge of Tanakh - the Old Testament - and knowledge of God, of Hashem, and spreading knowledge of the concept of Mashiach and the concept of divine law. Christianity had that important role to play. It was ultimately the Jewish mission to spread "godliness" to the world and Christians helped them in that endeavor to bring the Torah to the world.
If you want to believe that, go ahead and believe it. Throughout the Gospels Jesus condemns the Pharisees and Sadducees in no uncertain terms; they in turn plotted to murder him. Moreover Christianity was anathematized and expelled from Judaism in the latter half of the 1st century. The Romans from Nero onwards (middle of the first century) distinguished between the Jews and the Christians and persecuted the latter. And yes, the Jews DO hate Christianity, and they hate Gentiles, viz:
"The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, Baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al, don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history; it is the white race and it alone—its ideologies and inventions—which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life itself.
— Susan Sontag
"When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is not to win over more whites to oppose “racism”; there are “anti-racists” enough already to do the job. The task is to gather together a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white. It is a strategy of creative provocation.”
— Noel Ignatiev
"A religion based upon the principle of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” might have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past."
— Ron Unz
The Talmud specifically teaches that Jesus' mother was a whore, his father a Roman Centurion, that he is in the bottom circle of Hell in a cauldron of boiling excrement; furthermore that Christianity is "Avodah Zarah" and all followers must die.
Here's some links to cut your teeth on:
💣 "A Modestly Priced Weapon - Our Controlled Press" - https://www.bitchute.com/video/2BNkmsR70oFM/
💣 "Our Fight Against the Malevolent Hatred of the 'Eternal Rebel'" - https://www.bitchute.com/video/sepY0zSDxLIa
💣 American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion - https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/
💣 American Pravda: Holocaust Denial - https://www.unz.com/article/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
💣 American Pravda: Jews and Nazis - https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-jews-and-nazis/
💣 My Awakening to the Jewish Question - https://thejews.substack.com/p/my-awakening-to-the-jewish-question
💣 The Jewish Plot to Enslave Humanity - https://captroyharkness.substack.com/p/the-jewish-plot-to-enslave-humanity
💣 A Crash Course on the True Causes of Antisemitism - https://captroyharkness.substack.com/p/a-crash-course-on-the-true-causes
And you are at liberty to continue to be deceived by Jewish deceptions.
Thanks for the links - I have already read the Ron Unz articles before you shared them. I'd gladly share my reading list with you, if I had any reason to believe you'd follow up the titles and actually read them. The problem is that the authors in my reading list tear the entire Jesus and Christianity fraud to pieces and it's my experience that Christians aren't in the business of challenging their faith with countervailing facts.
Jesus was a Jewish invention, a fabrication. He is a midrashic myth created by a first century mystical Jewish sect. There is zero archaeological evidence of Jesus. There is not a shard or artifact of any kind that could be construed as evidence of Jesus. The gospels are in no way proof of the existence of Jesus. In fact, the way the gospels came about is almost comical.
The earliest mentions of Jesus are Paul’s letters, written around 50–60 AD, two decades after the Jesus' death. The Acts of the Apostles records three apparitions of Jesus received by Paul: Paul’s Vision on the Road to Damascus (Acts 9, 22, and 26), Paul’s Trance in the Temple (Acts 22:17-21), and Paul’s Vision in Prison (Acts 23:11). I'll restate that: Paul never met Jesus - he had visions of Jesus. So we have the first mentions of Jesus as a result of the recurring visions of a hallucinator, possibly a schizophrenic one.
Mark is generally considered the earliest gospel, written around 65–70 AD, followed by Matthew and Luke in the 80s or 90s AD. John might also make it into the 1st century, as it’s usually dated to around 90–100 AD. The first of the four Gospels, by Mark, was written another two decades after Paul’s writings. If the Jesus was crucified at age 33 as is claimed (a commonly used number from Jewish numerology, for example, King David ruled in Jerusalem for 33 years, 33 miracles were performed by Jesus, the 33 elements including the whole and all its constituent parts in the Sephiroth of the Kabbalah, etc.), at his death in AD 28-30 (his birth occurred between 5 and 6 BC), and if it is assumed that Mark was of similar age at the time, somehow Mark finally got the itch to write about the Earth-shattering event that was the life of the Jesus and his divine awesomeness when Mark was into his 70s. What was he doing that was more important from the time he was hanging with the Messiah that delayed him from writing about The Son of God?
Furthermore, that 'Jesus Christ.' or cognate names, wasn't mentioned by most historians and chroniclers of the time, is conspicuous also in that historians and protagonists in history in the past, as they do in the present, will tend to credit each other. As Jesus ostensibly performed miracles of global expanse (e.g. Mathew 27), his words going “unto the ends of the whole world” (Romans 10), one would expect virtually every literate person on earth to record those events during his time. Any Jesus contemporary should have done so, but they did not, and we only have Paul's visions and the suddenly remembered chronicles of Jesus' life after a forty or so year gap appearing as the gospels. You have got to be kidding me.
Listen to this:
"BrightLearn - Revealing Noahide Laws and Middle East Turmoil" - https://www.brighteon.com/8ce25215-b879-4c74-9300-1e4fa3ff7139
Yeah, well, whatever. I provided you other links besides Mr. Unz: The Asha Logos videos for example. There is also not a shred of evidence for the myths in the Torah, of the Jews (pardon me, "Hebrews") being enslaved in Egypt, of God visiting plagues upon the Egyptians, nor of the Exodus. There's a lot of doubt about the conquest of Canaan, of the existence of Moses, David or Solomon. The "Jewish never existed" patter was a conceit of some 19th Century scholars long put to rest. The vast majority of academics – far better informed than me – have no doubt as to Jesus' existence; as for nothing being know about him? How many people from 2,000 years ago do we have any record of? Meanwhile a lot of people think Mohammed made up Islam out of whole cloth. I wouldn't try persuading a convinced Muslim of this if I were you. Finally if you want to send me your list of titles, by all means.
Strange coincidence, I only just watched the Asha Logos video, No More Sidelines, a few days before this discussion began. It's very good, and both dismaying and uplifting at the same time but for different reasons. I may need to watch it again because I came away from watching it with a distinct impression that the narrator spoke of God and the divine from a Christian perspective. But because monotheism became the only religious belief allowed soon after Christianization (though monotheism was conceived by the Zoroastrians, only the worship of the Jewish-Christian god was permitted), and despite Chistianity's efforts to separate Jesus from god (Yahweh), the fact remains that the god of Christianity was and still is Yahweh. This being so, the narrator or indeed anyone imploring or soliciting god is passively endorsing the Jewish concept of divinity, in which case the video No More Sidelines and the objectives it purports to pursue is working at cross purposes.
"The vast majority of academics – far better informed than me – have no doubt as to Jesus' existence; as for nothing being know about him?"
I don't know which academics ypu are referring to nor which is their field of expertise, however I do suspect that if their pay check depends on them sustaining a narrative, they are unlikely to oppose it.
"How many people from 2,000 years ago do we have any record of?"
That depends on who they were and what agenda, historical and in the present day, are contingent upon those people from 2,000 years ago existing. A vast web of institutions and establishment purposes are predicated upon this notion of Jesus and the disparaging of, or even contempt for this life in favor of the next.
Anyhow, here's my reading list:
Thomas Römer, The Invention of God, Harvard UP, 2015
Hyam Maccoby, The Sacred Executioner, Thames & Hudson, 1982.
Laurent Guyénot, Our God Is Your God Too, But He Has Chosen Us: Essays on Jewish Power, AFNIL, 2020.
Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World, Mariner Books, 2018
David Fitzgerald, Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed at All, Lulu.com, 2010
Also by David Fitzgerald, Jesus Mything In Action, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017
Robert M Price, Deconstructing Jesus, Prometheus, 2000
Paula Fredriksen, Paul: The Pagans' Apostle, Yale University Press, 2017
Richard Carrier, On the Historicity of Jesus, Why We Might Have Reason For Doubt, Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014
Randel Helms, Gospel Fictions, Prometheus, 1989
Russell E.] Gmirkin, Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuch, T&T Clark, 2006 - which described how they fabricated the New Testament in Pesher style (an approach to Biblical interpretation, found most notably in the Dead Sea Scrolls) from connecting scripture of the Old Testament
As the stories, the reality of, come out, we begin to realise. And that realisation freezes us. Only this time, they have technology. Raw power. It's why people are afraid. But we also have to face the truth. The jew it seems, appears capable of using whatever's at hand. Semitic or anti-semitic. And they appear to be behind it all.
I kind of hate reading your writing. It's evocative, brutal, brilliant, the truth and entirely too flipping nasty. But these realities need to be exposed. This one hit home.
You are absolutely correct on this. The Jewish Bolsheviks. The fact that they were largely Jews has conveniently been omitted from modern history. I have only recently become aware of this.
Fine job. Thank you.
When you weed your garden, do you care that some complain of your cruelty to sentience? If you do, the weeds will overtake you as surely as will starving wolves. But weeds will consume you, blamelessly, from the inside.
So you like Solzhenitsyn’s reminiscent proactive suggestions of “if we just” (if we just killed them before they killed us, essentially is what he is saying). And you made the great point of showing that once the situation gets that far along, that it’s really too late. So would it be fair to assume that you think that being proactive (kill them before they kill you) LONG before the situation makes it almost impossible, would be the logical thing to do (since it’s quite obvious by now that neither voting nor personal appeals amount to much)? And if we go that far, killing them proactively is really another word for genocide or cleansing, am I right? Kill or be killed. Maybe Jehovah was on to something about eradicating certain communities right down to the family pets. Now you think it was a marching order for the Jews against the gentiles - here is where we disagree. I think it was against the half human hybrids that live among us, that look like us, eat like us, breed like us, go poop like us, but are not us. The Tares among the wheat (Matthew 13). And it’s those whom Jesus points out in Revelation, “ that call themselves Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan”. Imposters. And it’s what Chucky is unintentionally pointing to (see chucky’s comment) by sharing that bit about Kunstler. Even the average mindf**ked Jew is finally beginning to notice that something is not right, something is quite wrong.
And I know you poo poo the idea of non human entities among us, but I will make the case that what I see is that humanity is always being undermined and sabotaged. If you and I (presuming you are human), were to sit down together for a cup of coffee, and we were given the task of solving ….let’s say world hunger …., then in spite of whatever is different about us, we could hammer out a plan to accomplish it (provided we had the authority to manage the abundant resources of the flat plane we live on). But no, there is a force at work against whatever is good, which I think is non human. And further, I think humans can be absorbed into that hive by their immoral and unethical behavior, which transforms them from the inside out.
Humans generally want to be left alone to go about creating and enjoying life. Yes, we are infected with a selfishness that must be changed, which is a transformation that only Christ can initiate.
The story of the wedding party reminded me of George Soros, who at one time bragged about helping the Nazis seize the property of people who were being sent to concentration camps. He admitted it was the best time of his life, as I recall. Not all evil doers lament what they have done; some go on to do even more evil deeds until they die. For them, the evil oozes out of every pore and never seems to go away.
I also wonder whether the story about the train prompted the authors of the series "Yellowstone" to describe the Duttons' taking one of their enemies away to die as taking them to the "train station". Probably just a coincidence.
I'm reading an interesting book titled, "From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land...Clash of Civilizations," by Laurent Guyénot. It's a history of the Jews that helps, for me, to explain their behavior. Not a flattering account.
You know what Soros' job was specifically? As a 14-year-old, he accompanied the Nazis into the homes of Jews and helped catalogue the belongings as they were being taken away. Kind of odd, no? Why would you care what belonged to people you were just going to kill, anyway? Why not do like the Bolsheviks did to the Christians--just load the people into trucks and take them to the edge of town and shoot them and take whatever stuff of theirs you wanted?
The reason the Nazis, with Soros' help, kept records of what belonged to whom was because, after the war, the plan was that the Jews would go to Israel and import their stuff from Germany. In other words, no extermination plan. But the Germans are still paying reparations.
Exactly. All expenses paid relocation to the Land of Zion, I mean Palestine, I mean Canaan.
Guyenot is an excellent writer on conspiracy themes w/ a slew of good books, some of which remain to be translated. https://www.unz.com/author/laurent-guyenot/
My blood froze imagining these scenes and recognizing the equivalences in our present circumstances. The soundest remedy for this perturbation with terror is appropriate action. What to do?
Indeed.
Thank you for the lesson in history - Creator bless.
Don’t think jehova is on the side of bolsheviks. If anything, the text was adulterated by priests in favor of plunder, mass murder and rape. Don’t think jehovas Ten Commandments condone the Jews behavior.
The Levites who wrote Deuteronomy left in the Ten Commandments for unknown reasons. Every one of them except the one about having no other gods before me is abrogated in the following pages. "Thou shalt not kill," is cancelled repeatedly by Jehovah's exhortations to genocide entire cities..
A very grim story. This morning I got another post from one Toni Airaksinen, who has just converted to Judaism... 🤨 Personally I would have been far happier to learn she'd converted to Catholicism or better, The Church of England, but I digress. In this post she details the misfortune – although she does not phrase it thus – of Dr. Yasmeen Hanoosh (https://toniairaksinen.substack.com/p/arabic-prof-on-leave-claims-i-am), a professor of Arabic at Portland State University who has made a possible fatal misstep in publicly stating her loyalties... One of her followers (?) "Good Humor by CK Steefel" commented "Send her to Gaza." I replied "She's from Iraq. She doesn't need to visit Gaza" to which Ms. Steffel replied "Send her back to Iraq", to which I in turn replied "I suspect you'll eventually get your wish... 🤔"
She gave me a "like" for that... 🙄
... Thus a few hours later I added: "As a corollary to my earlier statement that you liked: Once Donald gets Bibi's "Antisemite Legislation" passed expect a whole bunch of us to get "deep-sixed"... 😱 "What's a Gentile to Do?" https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/whats-a-gentile-to-do
I imagine Ms. Steffel will eventually block me. Hopefully that's all she'll do. Meanwhile, as a resident of Woke Canuckistan, why am I worrying about Bibi/Donald's "Antisemitic Legislation"? Mark Carnage is resurrecting Justin Castreau's On-Line Harms Act; when that happens I could be facing life imprisonment for what amounts to "Thought Crime"... I need hardly add "Antisemitism" will figure prominently in the courts' judgments...
"And the last state of that man, was worse than the first." (Gospel of Matthew, 12:45)