Jews are the only people on the planet who want it to be illegal to dislike them. They're also the only people on the planet who torture children, so...
As others have said, another beautifully written and sanguine post, Craig.
I felt at a loss for words after reading it a couple of days ago... but it is still resonating with me.
I was reminded of your work when I watched this video tonight... it came out 5 years ago, but its message rings as true as ever. Well worth the 19 minutes of your time if you need a reminder of why those of us here do what we do:
Jim Kunstler, an American jew, calls out all the jews behind all the Lawfare, chaos and destruction of the US in his latest article. Very rare. Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?
I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with Kunstler. He's a great writer, and often makes scathingly accurate social commentaries. But almost every time I read him, I get little reminders that he is a Jew first and foremost.
He tells the truth often - but he also lies by omission. I can never tell if such people are self-deceived, or just really good at sharing just enough truth to keep us under their spell. Or both.
Indeed, I feel the same way. I just found it very unusual and interesting for a jew to call out other jews who are doing despicable things as "jews." It happens so rarely as to be practically nonexistent and made me immediately wonder what his angle could possibly be.
No one likes to learn that they're the "bad guys"; it takes a certain consciousness; not unlike learning the US is the biggest bully in the world and has created wars for profit rather than for "defending freedom and democracy."
Some do so when they are under the impression that the others have gone too far. The problem is that they waited too long to protect themselves because they profit from the Synagogue of satan's machinations.
The shekel is more important than self preservation (much less decency).
I think the jews are all indoctrinated with their mother’s milk to stick together, no matter what. To always cover for a fellow jew, regardless of their reprehensible conduct or whether you hate them on a personal level, on pain of being made an outcast and excommunicated from the tribe. Just do some research on how they kept each other in line back in the shtetl days and keep in mind that today’s “secular” jews are only a couple generations removed from the "observant” judaism of their grandparents and/or great-grandparents.
I'm no judaism expert, but I understand that it is basically illegal for a jew to accuse a jew of wrongdoing... UNLESS they are screwing over other jews. Anyone else is ok. Encouraged, even.
It seems to even permeate down thru secular jews, so is it nature or nurture?
Yes, true. I recall after the Madoff scandal broke seeing stories and discussions about how horrible it was that he screwed over so many fellow jews, implying that screwing over the jews was wrong, but screwing over the goyim was not. (Not sure how many goy directly lost money with Madoff, it seemed to be a jews-only enterprise.)
Jews always try to get in front of every movement to control it to their benefit, if one is starting to talk about antisemitism, then he's probably trying to mislead it to a harmless position.
Kunstler wasn't just talking about "antisemitism," he was actually committing "antisemitism" by calling out jews by name as "jews." Read the article, if you haven't already.
Yeah, he's calling out some particular Jews as a disgrace, not the fundamental issue of Jewish power in gentile nations. I'm sure if some "good Jews" we're in those positions, he wouldn't have a problem.
When Jews start talking about jewishness the same way hyper liberals whites (and ("whites") talk about whiteness, I'll start believing they're being honest.
It's plain in Kunstler's writings that he has nothing but contempt for us. Further, he never points the finger at his tribe for the ugliness he constantly moans about. Load him on a boxcar with the rest of them.
Kunstler has been bashing Whites for decades for what jews have been doing. That's dishonest. One article last month blaming a tiny handful of jews doesn't cut it. I know of one or two jew writers/commentators who have been forthright about what jews have been up to and they are Ron Unz and perhaps Nate Kapner. Whites need to stop being so conciliatory and should start holding jews accountable for their lies and destruction.
A timely reminder of no matter how many distractions we are afforded, the baseness of evil is alive and well.
We can lose ourselves in infinite playthings provided by our computers, but the physical and spiritual worlds are quite captured via the electronically-induced apathy of such overwhelming amounts of information, much of it ultimately useless, mere fill for a false comfort-bringing pillow.
It's shapinng up to be an exceptionally vicious wakeup call. We who understand human nature and history are at least forewarned.
P.S. I left a note several weeks ago in a previous article's thread which made reference to the tragedy of combining Judeo with Christian re: the Christian Bible back in the 5th century, I believe.
I could have sworn I read the story of that event itself in one of the first posts I saw from this site.
I wrote on the "Chains of Zion" thread:
"When that group of theologians—God experts—met in the 5th century AD and decided to attach the Hebrew Torah to the Christian Testament and pronounce them of “equal divine authority,” it was a blunder of cataclysmic proportions."
I was looking for the subject matter (essay) of the quote above, I thought it was something you had previously written which I read here. I perused closely trying to find a hyperlink directing me to it without success, and then went through the archives trying to find it, ultimately ending up here in my attempt to find it again.
Was it just my imagination that I originally read it here?
I recall being mightily impressed by it and wanted to use it in convincing my immediate family that our larger problem is to be traced to just that place in time.
Any help to be had in tracking it down? Or did I just imagine it?
Hi David, The comments on this post mention a theologian named Marcion who rejected the Old Testament in the 2nd century AD. Could this be what you were thinking of?
Once you've opened the link above, type [control]+[f] to bring up the search function at the bottom of your screen, and type in "marcion". You should get 13 matches. See in particular one of the comments from Ashowa from October 2.
To anybody who has actually familiarized themselves with the Bible, the idea that the two can be unhooked is just silly, as the New Testament is replete with quotes and references from the Old Testament. Further, books like Enoch, which is not in any of our modern Catholic or Protestant versions, is liberally quoted from. And that book is the one that clearly expounds on Genesis 6:4 and the idea of Angel - human hybrids.
Attempts to divorce the Old Testament from the NT, or Paul from Jesus, are typically from people driving an agenda, who’s audience are woefully ignorant of the details, and easily persuaded with great ,swelling, and wordy arguments.
Enoch 1:Chapter 1:6-7 is quoted by the Apostle Peter in 2 Pet 3:10
Enoch 10: 6-7 is the FIRST mention of the judgment followed by those cast into the lake of fire…and afterwards mentioned throughout scripture.
Enoch Chapter 19:1-3 is FIRST mention of what evil spirits (demons) will do concerning the causing of man to worship ‘other gods’ which are really demons and not gods at all. Hence the coming of paganism in Babylon (where this was accomplished), the ‘mythical gods’ of Greece and Rome throughout history (even to this day), and spoken of by the apostle Paul in 1 Cor 10:19-20.
Enoch Chapter 38:1 is mentioned by Y’Shua in Mt 25:32-34 and 41.
Enoch chapter 39:1-3 is the first reference to what occurs in Rev:4-8
Enoch chapter 40 is the FIRST mention of what occurs in Rev 5:11
Enoch chapter 46:2-3 is the FIRST mention of “the Son of Man”
Enoch chapter 47:3, is the FIRST mention of The Book of Life, mentioned later by Y’shua, in the book of Philippians as well as in the book of Revelation.
Enoch 62:11 is quoted in Romans 2:11
Enoch chapter 48:4 is quoted by Isaiah in Isa 42:6
Enoch 48:7 is the FIRST mention of salvation “in his name”. A theme being repeated often by the Apostles (although most religions fail to understand what it means to be ‘in his name’).
Enoch 22:10,12 is quoted in Luke 16:26
Enoch chapter 51:1 is spoken of by Y’shua in John 5:28-29
Enoch chapter 84:2 is mentioned again in Acts 7:49
Enoch chapter 91:6-7 is a theme repeated throughout the entire bible, first mentioned in the Book of Enoch.
Enoch 45:3 is quoted in Mt 25: 31-32 and John 14:2.
Enoch 94:8 is quoted by the Apostle James in Jas 5:1-3
The scenario first spoken of in Enoch 10:15,16 …was used for the basis of Jude6, 2 Pet 2:4 and Rev 20:10
Enoch 92:17 is fulfilled in Rev 22:1
Enoch 61:4-9 is fulfilled in 2 Thess 1:9, 1 Thess 5:3, 2 Thess 2:8 and Mt 25:31.....a list a friend complied showing the connections of Enoch to the Brit h'dasha
I think the story of the old Bolshevik being interrogated by the young Stalinist is known as Red Symphony. It nicely fleshes out the rift between the Trotskyist faction vs the Stalinists w/n the original Bolsheviks. Whether or not the event actually happened as depicted is questionable.
The Trotskyites became Zionists and later morphed into today's neocons. And their intra-Jewish feud has been reignited over Gaza, whereby the Trots/neocons defend Israel's slaughter of Palestinians and the old school Bolshies call them out for their genocide.
One can make temporary alliance w/ the old schoolers, but be aware they're still commies at heart..
So you like Solzhenitsyn’s reminiscent proactive suggestions of “if we just” (if we just killed them before they killed us, essentially is what he is saying). And you made the great point of showing that once the situation gets that far along, that it’s really too late. So would it be fair to assume that you think that being proactive (kill them before they kill you) LONG before the situation makes it almost impossible, would be the logical thing to do (since it’s quite obvious by now that neither voting nor personal appeals amount to much)? And if we go that far, killing them proactively is really another word for genocide or cleansing, am I right? Kill or be killed. Maybe Jehovah was on to something about eradicating certain communities right down to the family pets. Now you think it was a marching order for the Jews against the gentiles - here is where we disagree. I think it was against the half human hybrids that live among us, that look like us, eat like us, breed like us, go poop like us, but are not us. The Tares among the wheat (Matthew 13). And it’s those whom Jesus points out in Revelation, “ that call themselves Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan”. Imposters. And it’s what Chucky is unintentionally pointing to (see chucky’s comment) by sharing that bit about Kunstler. Even the average mindf**ked Jew is finally beginning to notice that something is not right, something is quite wrong.
And I know you poo poo the idea of non human entities among us, but I will make the case that what I see is that humanity is always being undermined and sabotaged. If you and I (presuming you are human), were to sit down together for a cup of coffee, and we were given the task of solving ….let’s say world hunger …., then in spite of whatever is different about us, we could hammer out a plan to accomplish it (provided we had the authority to manage the abundant resources of the flat plane we live on). But no, there is a force at work against whatever is good, which I think is non human. And further, I think humans can be absorbed into that hive by their immoral and unethical behavior, which transforms them from the inside out.
Humans generally want to be left alone to go about creating and enjoying life. Yes, we are infected with a selfishness that must be changed, which is a transformation that only Christ can initiate.
We, the Anglo nations, are in a sense now those gentile traitors--having gleefully destroyed our fellow Germanics, burning them in their thousands and torturing then executing their leaders, presiding over their spiritual annihilation, we ourselves must face that same executioner, and confront the horror of our situation--as a People perhaps rightly cursed.
The story of the wedding party reminded me of George Soros, who at one time bragged about helping the Nazis seize the property of people who were being sent to concentration camps. He admitted it was the best time of his life, as I recall. Not all evil doers lament what they have done; some go on to do even more evil deeds until they die. For them, the evil oozes out of every pore and never seems to go away.
I also wonder whether the story about the train prompted the authors of the series "Yellowstone" to describe the Duttons' taking one of their enemies away to die as taking them to the "train station". Probably just a coincidence.
I'm reading an interesting book titled, "From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land...Clash of Civilizations," by Laurent Guyénot. It's a history of the Jews that helps, for me, to explain their behavior. Not a flattering account.
As others have said, another beautifully written and sanguine post, Craig.
I felt at a loss for words after reading it a couple of days ago... but it is still resonating with me.
I was reminded of your work when I watched this video tonight... it came out 5 years ago, but its message rings as true as ever. Well worth the 19 minutes of your time if you need a reminder of why those of us here do what we do:
"No More Sidelines. Rise Up White Man"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPKqZ5b3Haji/
The story of the doomed wedding party is hauntingly evocative and very thought provoking....
Dostoevsky is a feast. Any people who can produce a Dostoevsky are natural and permanent allies.
Wonderful sentiments👏👏👏
Beautifully written.
The first thought that comes to mind is, God bless the Founders for including the Second Amendment. It may yet save us.
Jim Kunstler, an American jew, calls out all the jews behind all the Lawfare, chaos and destruction of the US in his latest article. Very rare. Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?
https://jameshowardkunstler.substack.com/p/lawfare-is-jihad-against-our-country
I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with Kunstler. He's a great writer, and often makes scathingly accurate social commentaries. But almost every time I read him, I get little reminders that he is a Jew first and foremost.
He tells the truth often - but he also lies by omission. I can never tell if such people are self-deceived, or just really good at sharing just enough truth to keep us under their spell. Or both.
Indeed, I feel the same way. I just found it very unusual and interesting for a jew to call out other jews who are doing despicable things as "jews." It happens so rarely as to be practically nonexistent and made me immediately wonder what his angle could possibly be.
Save his own skin
The latter, probably ( it’s more ‘fun’ for the perpetrator and that gives with the outsider).
"Are the less insane jews starting to feel the heat and see the writing on the wall?"
At this point, it is too late. They should have stopped it long ago.
No one likes to learn that they're the "bad guys"; it takes a certain consciousness; not unlike learning the US is the biggest bully in the world and has created wars for profit rather than for "defending freedom and democracy."
You missed my point. It’s very rare to hear a jew call out other jews specifically by name and as "jews." I was speculating as to why.
I'm not being critical. Just an observation.
Some do so when they are under the impression that the others have gone too far. The problem is that they waited too long to protect themselves because they profit from the Synagogue of satan's machinations.
The shekel is more important than self preservation (much less decency).
I think the jews are all indoctrinated with their mother’s milk to stick together, no matter what. To always cover for a fellow jew, regardless of their reprehensible conduct or whether you hate them on a personal level, on pain of being made an outcast and excommunicated from the tribe. Just do some research on how they kept each other in line back in the shtetl days and keep in mind that today’s “secular” jews are only a couple generations removed from the "observant” judaism of their grandparents and/or great-grandparents.
I'm no judaism expert, but I understand that it is basically illegal for a jew to accuse a jew of wrongdoing... UNLESS they are screwing over other jews. Anyone else is ok. Encouraged, even.
It seems to even permeate down thru secular jews, so is it nature or nurture?
Yes, true. I recall after the Madoff scandal broke seeing stories and discussions about how horrible it was that he screwed over so many fellow jews, implying that screwing over the jews was wrong, but screwing over the goyim was not. (Not sure how many goy directly lost money with Madoff, it seemed to be a jews-only enterprise.)
Jews always try to get in front of every movement to control it to their benefit, if one is starting to talk about antisemitism, then he's probably trying to mislead it to a harmless position.
Kunstler wasn't just talking about "antisemitism," he was actually committing "antisemitism" by calling out jews by name as "jews." Read the article, if you haven't already.
Yeah, he's calling out some particular Jews as a disgrace, not the fundamental issue of Jewish power in gentile nations. I'm sure if some "good Jews" we're in those positions, he wouldn't have a problem.
When Jews start talking about jewishness the same way hyper liberals whites (and ("whites") talk about whiteness, I'll start believing they're being honest.
It's plain in Kunstler's writings that he has nothing but contempt for us. Further, he never points the finger at his tribe for the ugliness he constantly moans about. Load him on a boxcar with the rest of them.
What are you talking about? He pointed his finger at his tribe in the article I linked. That was the whole point of my comment.
Kunstler has been bashing Whites for decades for what jews have been doing. That's dishonest. One article last month blaming a tiny handful of jews doesn't cut it. I know of one or two jew writers/commentators who have been forthright about what jews have been up to and they are Ron Unz and perhaps Nate Kapner. Whites need to stop being so conciliatory and should start holding jews accountable for their lies and destruction.
A timely reminder of no matter how many distractions we are afforded, the baseness of evil is alive and well.
We can lose ourselves in infinite playthings provided by our computers, but the physical and spiritual worlds are quite captured via the electronically-induced apathy of such overwhelming amounts of information, much of it ultimately useless, mere fill for a false comfort-bringing pillow.
It's shapinng up to be an exceptionally vicious wakeup call. We who understand human nature and history are at least forewarned.
P.S. I left a note several weeks ago in a previous article's thread which made reference to the tragedy of combining Judeo with Christian re: the Christian Bible back in the 5th century, I believe.
I could have sworn I read the story of that event itself in one of the first posts I saw from this site.
I wrote on the "Chains of Zion" thread:
"When that group of theologians—God experts—met in the 5th century AD and decided to attach the Hebrew Torah to the Christian Testament and pronounce them of “equal divine authority,” it was a blunder of cataclysmic proportions."
I was looking for the subject matter (essay) of the quote above, I thought it was something you had previously written which I read here. I perused closely trying to find a hyperlink directing me to it without success, and then went through the archives trying to find it, ultimately ending up here in my attempt to find it again.
Was it just my imagination that I originally read it here?
I recall being mightily impressed by it and wanted to use it in convincing my immediate family that our larger problem is to be traced to just that place in time.
Any help to be had in tracking it down? Or did I just imagine it?
Thanks for all you do.
Hi David, The comments on this post mention a theologian named Marcion who rejected the Old Testament in the 2nd century AD. Could this be what you were thinking of?
https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/odysseus-unsheathed/comments
Once you've opened the link above, type [control]+[f] to bring up the search function at the bottom of your screen, and type in "marcion". You should get 13 matches. See in particular one of the comments from Ashowa from October 2.
To anybody who has actually familiarized themselves with the Bible, the idea that the two can be unhooked is just silly, as the New Testament is replete with quotes and references from the Old Testament. Further, books like Enoch, which is not in any of our modern Catholic or Protestant versions, is liberally quoted from. And that book is the one that clearly expounds on Genesis 6:4 and the idea of Angel - human hybrids.
Attempts to divorce the Old Testament from the NT, or Paul from Jesus, are typically from people driving an agenda, who’s audience are woefully ignorant of the details, and easily persuaded with great ,swelling, and wordy arguments.
Enoch 94:8…was quoted in Luke 6:24
Enoch 108:12…was quoted in Mat 19:28
Enoch 38:2 was quoted in Mat 26:24
Enoch 27:1 was the basis of Luke 16:26
Enoch 41:2 mansions mentioned in John 14:2
Enoch 48:1 was the basis of John 4:13-14
Enoch 108:11 is quoted in John 12:36
Enoch 1:9 is quoted in Jude 1:14-15
Enoch 1:3-4 is prophesied again in Isaiah 42:13
Enoch 1:Chapter 1:6-7 is quoted by the Apostle Peter in 2 Pet 3:10
Enoch 10: 6-7 is the FIRST mention of the judgment followed by those cast into the lake of fire…and afterwards mentioned throughout scripture.
Enoch Chapter 19:1-3 is FIRST mention of what evil spirits (demons) will do concerning the causing of man to worship ‘other gods’ which are really demons and not gods at all. Hence the coming of paganism in Babylon (where this was accomplished), the ‘mythical gods’ of Greece and Rome throughout history (even to this day), and spoken of by the apostle Paul in 1 Cor 10:19-20.
Enoch Chapter 38:1 is mentioned by Y’Shua in Mt 25:32-34 and 41.
Enoch chapter 39:1-3 is the first reference to what occurs in Rev:4-8
Enoch chapter 40 is the FIRST mention of what occurs in Rev 5:11
Enoch chapter 46:2-3 is the FIRST mention of “the Son of Man”
Enoch chapter 47:3, is the FIRST mention of The Book of Life, mentioned later by Y’shua, in the book of Philippians as well as in the book of Revelation.
Enoch 62:11 is quoted in Romans 2:11
Enoch chapter 48:4 is quoted by Isaiah in Isa 42:6
Enoch 48:7 is the FIRST mention of salvation “in his name”. A theme being repeated often by the Apostles (although most religions fail to understand what it means to be ‘in his name’).
Enoch 22:10,12 is quoted in Luke 16:26
Enoch chapter 51:1 is spoken of by Y’shua in John 5:28-29
Enoch chapter 84:2 is mentioned again in Acts 7:49
Enoch chapter 91:6-7 is a theme repeated throughout the entire bible, first mentioned in the Book of Enoch.
Enoch 45:3 is quoted in Mt 25: 31-32 and John 14:2.
Enoch 94:8 is quoted by the Apostle James in Jas 5:1-3
The scenario first spoken of in Enoch 10:15,16 …was used for the basis of Jude6, 2 Pet 2:4 and Rev 20:10
Enoch 92:17 is fulfilled in Rev 22:1
Enoch 61:4-9 is fulfilled in 2 Thess 1:9, 1 Thess 5:3, 2 Thess 2:8 and Mt 25:31.....a list a friend complied showing the connections of Enoch to the Brit h'dasha
deep thoughts, very unusual nowdays ... to paraphrase from you above: you have made you life worth living
I think the story of the old Bolshevik being interrogated by the young Stalinist is known as Red Symphony. It nicely fleshes out the rift between the Trotskyist faction vs the Stalinists w/n the original Bolsheviks. Whether or not the event actually happened as depicted is questionable.
The Trotskyites became Zionists and later morphed into today's neocons. And their intra-Jewish feud has been reignited over Gaza, whereby the Trots/neocons defend Israel's slaughter of Palestinians and the old school Bolshies call them out for their genocide.
One can make temporary alliance w/ the old schoolers, but be aware they're still commies at heart..
So you like Solzhenitsyn’s reminiscent proactive suggestions of “if we just” (if we just killed them before they killed us, essentially is what he is saying). And you made the great point of showing that once the situation gets that far along, that it’s really too late. So would it be fair to assume that you think that being proactive (kill them before they kill you) LONG before the situation makes it almost impossible, would be the logical thing to do (since it’s quite obvious by now that neither voting nor personal appeals amount to much)? And if we go that far, killing them proactively is really another word for genocide or cleansing, am I right? Kill or be killed. Maybe Jehovah was on to something about eradicating certain communities right down to the family pets. Now you think it was a marching order for the Jews against the gentiles - here is where we disagree. I think it was against the half human hybrids that live among us, that look like us, eat like us, breed like us, go poop like us, but are not us. The Tares among the wheat (Matthew 13). And it’s those whom Jesus points out in Revelation, “ that call themselves Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan”. Imposters. And it’s what Chucky is unintentionally pointing to (see chucky’s comment) by sharing that bit about Kunstler. Even the average mindf**ked Jew is finally beginning to notice that something is not right, something is quite wrong.
And I know you poo poo the idea of non human entities among us, but I will make the case that what I see is that humanity is always being undermined and sabotaged. If you and I (presuming you are human), were to sit down together for a cup of coffee, and we were given the task of solving ….let’s say world hunger …., then in spite of whatever is different about us, we could hammer out a plan to accomplish it (provided we had the authority to manage the abundant resources of the flat plane we live on). But no, there is a force at work against whatever is good, which I think is non human. And further, I think humans can be absorbed into that hive by their immoral and unethical behavior, which transforms them from the inside out.
Humans generally want to be left alone to go about creating and enjoying life. Yes, we are infected with a selfishness that must be changed, which is a transformation that only Christ can initiate.
We, the Anglo nations, are in a sense now those gentile traitors--having gleefully destroyed our fellow Germanics, burning them in their thousands and torturing then executing their leaders, presiding over their spiritual annihilation, we ourselves must face that same executioner, and confront the horror of our situation--as a People perhaps rightly cursed.
The story of the wedding party reminded me of George Soros, who at one time bragged about helping the Nazis seize the property of people who were being sent to concentration camps. He admitted it was the best time of his life, as I recall. Not all evil doers lament what they have done; some go on to do even more evil deeds until they die. For them, the evil oozes out of every pore and never seems to go away.
I also wonder whether the story about the train prompted the authors of the series "Yellowstone" to describe the Duttons' taking one of their enemies away to die as taking them to the "train station". Probably just a coincidence.
I'm reading an interesting book titled, "From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land...Clash of Civilizations," by Laurent Guyénot. It's a history of the Jews that helps, for me, to explain their behavior. Not a flattering account.
Guyenot is an excellent writer on conspiracy themes w/ a slew of good books, some of which remain to be translated. https://www.unz.com/author/laurent-guyenot/
Yeah!
GROW SOME BALLS!
FIGHT the Jewish Nazis!
Can you link the referenced interrogation transcript?