The ethnic composition of Joe Biden's White House is an affront to the people who make up 98% of the U.S.'s population. That only the 2% are so over-represented as being most capable of directing our foreign and domestic affairs glares back at us with an utter disdain in that we have allowed it under the notion to do otherwise would be loudly and insistently declaimed as "anti-semitism." What a clever and nice box they have put us in, no?
From their sinecure, overseeing a lifelong-corrupt, doddering old man who just happens to be a US President, directing him if not commanding him, they are able to fully exercise their desires for vendettas and vengeance, via the U.S. military, especially now as being made manifest in Ukraine, a mass blood-letting of Gentiles---or goy, if you will.
Their age-old hatred for Russia for having been banished to the Pale of Settlement by the Czars. And the fact they want the Ukraine back for themselves (Israel.) That they have long-blackmailed and extorted U.S. and other Western politicians (inc Presidents) and bureaucrats puts someone of Biden's *moral fiber* squarely in their crosshairs, and likely so going back to keeping a close watch on him and encouraging compromising incidents that were duly filmed or photographed, ala Epstein.
And speaking of Presidents and being compromised, I give you LBJ and the USS Liberty---why LBJ hushed that up and left them to endure ongoing repeated attacks. "We're not going to embarrass Israel..." I rather think he was thinking about his own blackmailed ass. The Mossad and its precursors had long utilized such tactics even before the state of Israel was 'consecrated.'
LBJ had already allowed them to steal a large quantity of nuclear weapons triggers from a "secure facility," enough to allow them to be the first outlaw nuclear state. The French---who built Dimona---had and have politicians too. Even Nelson Rockefeller was compromised and used when confronted by Israeli agents with evidence of his Nazi complicity during WW II.
What are the odds of a lifelong Catholic family such as Biden's having each and every son and daughter marrying Jews? Each and every one.
Storm clouds and lightning are moving our way. And we are so far down the wrong trail and night has fallen.
There is much more going on elsewhere too, Christian Armenia for example. Evil kids turned loose in a candy store and determined to use all of the power at their disposal, including keeping the U.S. southern border flood gates wide open, Mr Mayorka's (one of the Chosen) purview.
This piece goes directly to answering the why. Why do the who do what they do? Supposing the who have been revealed to those w/ eyes to see, or more likely, ears to listen. Then the next big question is why. Why would a race/people want to destroy everything other peoples have built? Limited destruction is understandable, passing fits of mayhem as well. But murderers, rapists and vandals all have satiation points or at least down time, resting on laurels, riding off into the sunset after a job well done.
Perhaps a serial killer would be a type that transcends term limits and bypasses normal boundaries. No guilty conscience to impede his purpose. Obsession and compulsion rather than anger, envy and lust (classical human vices) fuel the quest for unending destruction.
Herve Ryssen has a couple of books which offer much insight into the why problem, but Craig has simply and concisely nailed the motivation as being a religious mission Straight Outta Deuteronomy. No other religious scripture comes close to the insistent gangsta insanity unleashed in the OT (The Holy Terror, er Torah).
Thank you for reminding me about Herve Ryssen. I heard about him for the first time when he was sentenced to prison in France for "Holocaust denial." I had forgotten his name but did want to explore his work. He's written a bunch of books on the subject of Jews. Anyone who will risk imprisonment just to state their views is a serious person.
I like this site. For Christians they're bold. They use the term Judeo-Masonic to categorize Judaizing Christians. I wish they'd take the next step and embrace Marcion's excision of the OT. Then and only then can Christianity stand on its own. On a less hopeful note, I see that Bitchute has shut down the Ryssen link.
Psychoanalysis of Judaism, 450 pages, divided into 3 parts: Jewish Messianism, Cosmopolitan Personality and Psychopathology of Judaism. The paperback has an attractively symbolic cover by Marc Chagall. (got mine from Barnes Review $30)
Whine, whine, whine. Ya’ll whine about Deuteronomy, but never put it in context. I find that most critics of the Bible, don’t actually have a grasp of what it says, or cherry pick it and take it out of context, whether slightly or far makes no difference. And I think ya’ll do this to try to cover for your own sins and shortcomings before God. Do you think your word salads impress God? Study to show yourselves approved, rightly dividing The Word of God. Humility is the only key that unlocks understanding; otherwise you trap yourself in a self destructive loop.
Here, the day of the Lord comes why? “For the transgression of Jacob and the sins of the house of Israel”. Whine, whine ….Deuteronomy, Deuteronomy… conquer the world… whine, whine. That’s what you people sound like. But if you bothered to pursue God with your whole heart, and humble yourself, you’d be given proper eyes to put the entire OT into proper context.
1 The word of the Lord that came to Micah of Moresheth during the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah—the vision he saw concerning Samaria and Jerusalem.
2 Hear, you peoples, all of you,
listen, earth and all who live in it,
that the Sovereign Lord may bear witness against you,
the Lord from his holy temple.
Judgment Against Samaria and Jerusalem
3 Look! The Lord is coming from his dwelling place;
he comes down and treads on the heights of the earth.
that's a thundering great quote! but I'm a simple sinner trying to understand. And I can't understand it. Would be kind enough to tell me what it means?
You must decide what is True. Did Jesus, the Messiah (the Christ), rise from the dead or not? (1 Cor 15:14) You appear to deny that Jesus rose from the dead.
I agree with your struggle against the perfidious Jews, who are the enemy of all mankind. Plenty of non-Christian civilizations have recognized the damage that the parasitical Jews do. I wish you well in fighting their evil.
But you will only be successful against evil by firmly aligning yourself with Truth.
Truth, yes, but, in my view, one's religious life is an intensely personal affair. No one has a claim on the details of anyone else's experience of the divine, and if such a claim existed, it would necessarily be on something less than divine.
One of the many things that enfeebles Christianity is this litmus religious test so many Christians apply to political figures. So some politician like George W Bush comes along and gives an interview "from his heart" detailing his deepest personal religious "convictions" and, on that basis, millions of evangelicals run out and put one of the worst presidents ever into office.
Dear Christians:
First, you are not God. You don't have the power to see into someone's "heart" through your TV screen and politicians have been known to bend the truth in order to get elected. In fact, someone who is vulgar enough to disgorge the intimate details of his personal religious life in public during a political campaign in order to get people to vote for him is probably unfit for office anyway.
Second, God doesn't give a fuck who the president of the United States is. I know that 99 percent of Christians will disagree with that, but it's true. Religion and politics are in completely different spheres. Just as religion and science are in completely different spheres.
I understood this truth early on. My Dad is a farmer and, as you can imagine, the weather plays a big role in a farmer's life. So when my Dad "asked the blessing" before meals, he would frequently ask God for more rain or for less rain, depending on the conditions outside. One day it struck me that there really was no difference between Dad's solemn entreaties for rain and a native American rain dance. So I suggested maybe we should get some indians to come do a rain dance because at least it was more colorful and there was dancing. Of course, to my Dad, this was about the most blasphemous thing that could possibly be said and he coldly rejected my suggestion.
But, of course, whether it rains or not has everything to do with atmospheric pressure systems and so on and nothing to do with some Supreme Being sitting up there sending rain to Farmer Smith's farm because he remembered to pray for it and not sending it to Farmer Brown's neighboring farm because he forgot it only hired rain dancers. The idea is absurd and makes our religion ridiculous.
Christianity needs to absorb that insight if it is going to have a hope of saving the civilization it claims as its own. God doesn't give a fuck whether it's raining at my Dad's place. God also didn't send hurricane Katrina to punish the homosexuals in New Orleans. Talk like that is the real blasphemy because the weather is entirely in the realm of science and has nothing to do with religion. There are Christians out there who will reply, But the Bible says His eye is on the sparrow, which only serves to illustrate just how foolish and crippling it is to insist on sacred magic books.
I get it that, to a farmer whose crops are burning up, praying for rain provides a certain psychological comfort that he's *doing something* about the drought, but a mental salve isn't the same thing as religious truth. The one thing the West really doesn't need is a pacifier.
Another thing about prayer: too often I've seen people avoid doing something difficult but morally necessary by saying they would "pray about it." What they were really saying was they weren't going to do anything, but would pretend they were in order to make themselves feel better about failing in their moral duty. Christianity needs to reexamine the whole "talking to God" thing. God doesn't even speak English, for crying out loud, She speaks Yiddish. And as for those send-money-and-we-will-pray-for-you outfits....
To answer your question whether I believe Jesus rose from the dead: I can see the argument Dostoevsky makes in defense of the Resurrection, which is every bit as strong as the argument Bach makes in St Matthew's Passion. Both men were Christians and geniuses *as artists*. Dostoevsky even described the coming of the Bolsheviks accurately in his novel "Demons" published something like 60 years (!) before the revolution, so the man had penetrating insight to say the least. But he portrayed Jewish characters in his novels accurately --some better than others, some worse--which means he wasn't nearly the literary giant Elie Wiesel was, but I respect his grasp of Truth probably more than anyone else's. But, when it comes right down to it, religion is all about how we treat one another. That's it's entire realm. And, really, I don't really get how it makes all that much difference in the way I treat you whether I believe Jesus rose from the dead. I think Jesus would agree with me.
I think I understand Truth Seeker's point of view. Because I've found it in two of the more radical Protestant sects {Jehovah's Witnesses and Seven Day Adventists}. They are adamant that Eternal Life comes purely from (blind) Faith because that is the best they can cope with. Not everyone is able to think for themself. The path of faith suits such people. Unfortunately the teaching can be quite limiting.
Here are two examples:
First, that by handing off responsibility for action to the Divine they are able to avoid conflict with the authorities - useful if you want to have a successful religious organisation. But it comes at the cost of a closed mind instead of being one who wrestles with his responsibility to live a Christ like life. Such 'people avoid doing something difficult but morally necessary by saying they would "pray about it."...' because that is the best they are able to do. Altho sometimes I wonder if they aren't just two faced lying hypocrites who live in the 'false consciousness' of thinking they are outwitting their God. So stupid that they think an entirely self interested, outward show of faith is sufficient to get them thru St. Peter's Gate.
Second, most believers are normal people, not intellectuals, and so are unable to see the hypocrisy of their sect's position. The ability to cater to the less intellectual is both the advantage and the limitation of a religion based upon faith. Both sects rely upon the 'Word' as being divine and their interpretation of it is the only latitude allowed. Sad, really, but what can you do with people who can't think for themselves? They rely upon their betters for the interpretation and, I'd say, have been mislead down a wide and easy to follow path.
Then of course there are the Zionist Christians who adamantly deny that Jews worship Lucifer. Which is just sad. No doubt when they unwittingly follow Satan into battle they will convince themselves that their 'enemy', Jesus in all his Glory and backed by the Saints, is a false image, mere devilish trickery. Armageddon could be close run cock up!
Strangely enough the Bible does mention these failings. I believe it says that there will be many who think themselves saved but are mistakenly following the teachings of Satan. I'd put the bulk of the 70m or so American Evangelicals in that category.
Not that the Catholics are much better - there are those of them who have made a good case for the argument that the current pope is the anti-Christ. I would go along with that since he is a friend of Soros' and hangs out with Mrs. Rothschild - participating in her Council for Inclusive Capitalism.
"They rely upon their betters for the interpretation and, I'd say, have been misled down a wide and easy to follow path."
We desperately need a Christianity 2.0. If the path must be wide and easy, it should at least be leading to the proper destination.
"Then of course there are the Zionist Christians who adamantly deny that Jews worship Lucifer. Which is just sad."
Christian Zionists, in my experience, are the most stubbornly ignorant people on the planet. They see clearly that their civilization is collapsing around them, and that their enemies are in power over them, but they simply will not consider the possibility that God's Chosen People might be their enemy or that the very concept of a universal God even having such a thing as a "chosen people" is absurd and a logical impossibility. Christian Zionists, in my experience, are the quickest to react with anger to and sever a relationship rather than engage with a challenge of their beliefs--surely not a religiously defensible response. I have pity for them as they have been duped by the masters of deception. They feel the same pain we do watching it all go down the drain, but they feel it even worse as they are alone in an incomprehensible and lethal world. But they are still my people and I want to help them if I can only figure out how to do that.
I wonder if you realise the humongous changes that are needed - in my opinion.
Christians have, by and large, sanitised the Old Testament. For instance they gloss over that 'giving' the seed of Abraham the Promised Land consisted of the Jewish God giving them the victories that enabled them to ethnically cleanse 'their' Land. A whole society, happily living their lives - genocided by the Jews. Christians tend to forget that the Jews worship Satan. That their god is 'a murderer and the father of lies'. Jesus may have been situated in an Old Testament culture. But the Greek Jews who wrote the Gospels defined a new God, a Christian God. One who has nothing to do with child sacrifice (Abraham, Issac?) or genocide. The new God rejects an eye for an eye and instead exhorts us to turn the other cheek.
Christianity v 1.0 is Judaeo-Christianity.
Christianity v 2.0 should reject all the satanic vestiges - and ditch the OT. Or use it as an example of how evil people can be and to explain why Jesus was sent to reform Judaism. He did. It ended in 70AD with only his followers surviving. Modern 'Jews' follow the Talmud and that is a somewhat different religion but with the same god - Satan.
In 70 AD, when the Romans, invited into Jerusalem in the first place by the Pharisees to assist them in some internal political struggle, finally threw up their hands in exasperation and razed the place, there were *two* little bands that survived as I understand it--Jesus' followers and the Pharisees, themselves. Jesus' followers headed west toward Rome and the Pharisees moved the rabbinical government to somewhere in Syria. And, from that day to the present, Jesus' followers have been the objects of the genocidal hatred of the Talmudic center.
The rabbis seem poised for a final victory and I don't see any path out of our doom, save one very narrow, difficult one--the one that would require the "humongous changes" you note. Only the intensity of a religious revolution on that scale could generate the power necessary to break the rabbis' stranglehold on us in time to save our civilization.
So, the question becomes: how does one start a religious revolution? The only way I can think of is to follow Jesus, or, anyway, take his claim seriously that the truth shall set us free.
Possibly. I mean sure we need to update Christianity but whether or not we actually need a religion? I'm less sure about that. What we do need is an education system that inculcates those values that make for good people and good citizens. Christianity used to fill that role (when it inspired the curriculum) but sadly our children are now indoctrinated with the values pushed by Cultural Marxism.
A long time ago, I read a book called "Reason and Emotion" by a Scottish philosopher named John MacDonald in which he laid out the three spheres in which humans express rationality: Science, Art, and Religion. Science is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with the physical world, Art is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with humanity, Religion is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with each other.
His formulation stuck with me and has gained explanatory power for me over the years. So many human catastrophes can be laid at the feet of attempts to mix spheres. Marxist materialism's attempt to apply Science to Politics (which is in the sphere of Art) is a great example, or, vice versa, the climate change boondoggle when Politics is applied to Science. Priests have nothing to say about Science or Art as priests. Politicians have nothing to say about Religion or Science as politicians--we can't pass a law against love or gravity. There is no scientific way to measure someone's pain at the betrayal of a lover.
So, from his point of view, it means as much to say we don't need religion as it does to say we don't need science. They are both just there. I can say I don't believe in Science, but gravity is still going to work.
I think a big problem we have is that our religious development is still very very primitive compared to our scientific development. Religiously, we are at the stage of development Science was when we were throwing virgins into volcanoes to make the corn grow. But our Religious development has been severely retarded by this idea that because something is "written" that's the final and permanent religious truth and there can never be any religious progress beyond "God's word."
Nevertheless, I agree with you on the disastrous state of public education, which belongs in the sphere of Art. :)
I hold that the nature of 'religion' has been confused. As you point out with that terrible waste of a good virgin.
Lets go back to say 10,000BC. Language is getting useful and with it comes the beginnings of personal identity. (The concept of 'I' is changing from being body centred to the stories we tell ourselves about our self.) Man seeks to understand, and develops concepts to explain stuff. Such as orgasmic sky god has the thrill of orgasm (lightning) and then .... which cums as rain upon Mother Earth.
Obviously all this reality was created by an older, bigger god. Brahma or Jehovah or Cronos. And they knew this because the shaman explained it to them and thus they taught their kids. Who then grew up thinking God was an old shaman with a white beard sitting on a cloud etc.
Some smart arse starting writing all this down and there is your Holy Book. Which is not wrong. Just (mis)understood by us within the terms of our culture when it only works within the terms of the culture that created it.
So what is religion? Its Holy Books are the truths left behind by earlier cultures. One truth is the idea of 'God'. Another is the trope of the god that dies and is reborn - possibly based upon their experience of harvesting corn and then planting it next year. So now we confuse having 'faith' in Jesus, with a belief in him dying on the cross only to be reborn, with the wisdom of his teachings. That mishmash is the religion of the common man.
But there is also mysticism whereby the mortal (if he is 'blessed') may experience an intimidation of immortality. A 'moment of Clarity'. That, as most of now realize, is the product of a trained mind generating a specific psychological state {sometimes called a Kensho} and then placing that mystical experience within a religious frame work. Its not religious at all! But if its placed in a religious framework the enlightened monk becomes the Zen Master or a Saint and the values and teachings of the common religion appears to be validated by his mystical experience.
Teaching those values are a great way of inculcating children with those positive attitudes that will result in a civilized society. Similarly a faith in Christ may offer great psychological and emotional support when a parent has to resolve their grief over the loss of a child (for instance). Modern psychotherapy has no story that offers the emotional support such as that given by the priest when he reassures a devout catholic her child is now with Jesus in heaven and is living in Glory.
Like I say, the nature of 'religion' has been confused. Is it an early form of scientific explanation, a path to the Divine, a form of social control or a refuge for the common man?
So I agree with MacDonald. Things should be limited to their own particular sphere. Ergo, I think Christianity 2.0 is possible but it would entail jettisoning a lot of baggage and a serious re-write of the Truth. Just as the Greek culture took the Jewish teachings and rewrote them in harmony with Greek philosophy. That is the sort of revision it needs
"sending rain to Farmer Smith's farm because he remembered to pray for it and not sending it to Farmer Brown's neighboring farm because he forgot it only hired rain dancers."
As a polished piece of prose, one ready for publication to the general public, it should be smoothed out. But in any long piece on Substack, you'll find all kinds of grammatical errors and typos. I have a very good spell-check operating and still I make mistakes even in relatively short responses. And like you, I have a demon's eye for noticing breaks in the syntactic flow. "Catholic schoolin' and a couple of years as a proofreader'll do that to ya." So as a fellow formalist, I can tell you from experience, you won't garner much praise on earth or shorten your stay in purgatory from such pedantic endeavors. Better to concentrate on the content unless the mistake is truly interesting enough to provoke discussion.
No, no, you misunderestimate me. Or at least my motives. The prose is so good that I'd assumed the author would want to correct that one little mishap. I wasn't being critical, I was trying to help.
You are quite the mixed bag of internal rage and honest desire for the truth.
I agree that politics and Christianity are incompatible - “Do not be entangled in the affairs of this world”. Trump is the master of dancing evangelicals around. But the reason for this, is connected to your thoughts about prayer, and about a “wide and easy path”.
The New Testament is not an easy pill to swallow. Most people want a nice, gentle, easy to accept Jesus. But when you actually read what is said in the gospels and in the letters to the churches in Revelation - man, some very difficult things are said.
The reason that Christians fall for Trump & Bush, and the reason that prayer seems feeble, is because Christians generally don’t live the consecrated life that is required of them. Living the disciplined life is difficult in modern society. Most Christians are seduced by modernity (prosperity).
“The fervent, effective prayer of a righteous man avails to much”.
Look at the words in that verse - fervent - effective - righteous. They are telling you something about how prayer works. Most mumbled prayers do not ascend to heaven. Prayer is work. Prayer is discipline. Prayer requires an internal holiness . Clean thoughts. Clean diet. Intensely focused life. Disciplined reading of the Bible. Fasting often. Prayer is a huge responsibility and most of humanity fail at doing it correctly because they are weakened by their own sin (laziness, worldliness, lack of self control).
As to a “wide and easy path”….OMG. Imagine that you are God and you are going to convey immortality to humans. You are going to make them as lower gods (angels). Would you throw the gates wide open to all the degenerates that populate most of the face of the earth? Or would you reserve the right to a “few good men”? “Narrow is the gate and few there be that find it.” What you suggest is like lowering the standards to the military; and what you end up with is a weak and undisciplined military. (And that’s just for analogy purposes, because I disagree with the military industrial complex).
I think ultimately that you want to justify your own sin. Have at it. You’ll reap what you sow.
Psalm 53:2 “God looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are any who understand, who seek God.”
>>As to a “wide and easy path”….OMG. Imagine that you are God and you are going to convey immortality to humans. You are going to make them as lower gods (angels). Would you throw the gates wide open to all the degenerates that populate most of the face of the earth? <<
But, my area of interest isn't in how Heaven should be administered. My sole purpose in writing this blog is to try to come to grips with the intentional destruction of our civilization, which is occurring right in front of us. Maybe grope my way forward with a group of like-minded people toward some sort of resistance to our annihilation.
The subscription aspect of the Substack model provides me with a sense of obligation to my subscribers. That sense of obligation forces me to think carefully about my subject matter, to learn as much as I can about it, to draw conclusions judiciously from what I learn, and to work hard to make reading my posts as worthwhile as possible for my readers, every last one of whom, for all I know, may be neck-deep in stark raving, full-blown, foaming-at-the-mouth degeneracy.
Frankly, one degenerate who shares my desire to understand the nature of the world around us as accurately as possible--who believes it is noble to fight for his people, is worth more than a whole host of saints too busy fine-tuning Heaven's guest list to organize against genocide.
>>I think ultimately that you want to justify your own sin. Have at it. You’ll reap what you sow. <<
Isn't there something in your sacred magic book about judging not, lest ye be judged?
The difference between us is, that I think the enemy is spiritually animated and must be spiritually resisted. Your idea about gathering an army of degenerates is silly and you are too smart for such a comment. Look how most rolled right over for the virus scam. That lie was so apparent on the face of it, and yet most sinners lined right up (and a whole lot of saints too, such is the weak condition of the church right now). And IF you could even gather ten strong men, where would you start? Who’s door would you knock on first to “resist”? And then how far do you think you’d get?
“Judge not”, a favorite dodge of sinners. The word judgment is not so singularly defined. Just like the recent popular motto among some sinners, that “love is love”, as though love is simple.
True, Jesus ate with sinners of all stripes, but said to the woman caught in adultery - “go an sin no more”. And he had scathing comments for the religious degenerates. Think of the word for context: de-generate. To stop or reverse generation. That is more than just people sticking needles in their arms and overdosing on fentanyl. It’s the entire system of the Synagogue of Satan, The Vatican, as well as the common drunkard, pervert, idolator, etc.
I have no power of judgment, but I can point out the obvious. I don’t turn my nose up to any man. Heck, I would love to see Justin Trudeau and Gavin Newsom repent.
Might I suggest that religions tend to hope to attract the righteous to the religious life but are mostly meeting the needs of ordinary men.
"Most Christians are seduced by modernity (prosperity)."
Because most Christians are ordinary men, trying to do the right thing - live a decent life in a society dominated by consumerism.
There are very few who aspire to become a saint, who will give up family life and take up a life of prayer. Such are usually found in monasteries. Because 'Living the disciplined life is difficult in modern society.'
So while I agree with your observations I think it unfair to judge all by the same standards. Most church going Christians are just decent honest folk caring for their family and friends best they can. I would not judge them by the standards that are applied to those who have dedicated their life to the Divine.
It is crystal clear that you have no understanding of the Bible. You probably don't understand the reason there is an "Old Testament" and a "New Testament." But they are inseparable. You cannot have one without the other.
The Old Testament is a physical picture of a spiritual plan. Just because the unbelieving jews have used the OT as a license to justify their evil and greed, does NOT mean that is what God is saying.
It is GOD's Book; not the Jews book. You are caught between two lies: one that says the Jews have special privileged and therefore can do as they please, and two that Jesus is coming back to set up a "Jewish" kingdom.
I would like for you (or anyone) to explain this verse:
Romans 9:6 (KJV) "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:"
How can "Israel" not be of "Israel"? Because it is not a physical, earthly people, kingdom, or goal. This earth and this life are temporary. You think when we get in eternity, there are re going to be races and nationalities? There are going to verify some surprised and disappointed people. The same God that had Moses write Deuteronomy is the same God that had Peter and Paul (both Jews) write respectively:
1 Peter 1:17 (KJV) And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
Romans 10:12 (KJV) For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
I agree with your assessment of the greed and evil of the globalist/Zionist Jewish cabal and the clear history of their schemes and machinations. But I do NOT agree that the Bible in any way justifies them or those that think they are special.
You need to take a look inward and realize this:
1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV) "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."
You cannot see through the eyes of a carnal man and know what is going on in the world.
You have said so much in so few words. Thank you.
It Can't Happen Here
The ethnic composition of Joe Biden's White House is an affront to the people who make up 98% of the U.S.'s population. That only the 2% are so over-represented as being most capable of directing our foreign and domestic affairs glares back at us with an utter disdain in that we have allowed it under the notion to do otherwise would be loudly and insistently declaimed as "anti-semitism." What a clever and nice box they have put us in, no?
From their sinecure, overseeing a lifelong-corrupt, doddering old man who just happens to be a US President, directing him if not commanding him, they are able to fully exercise their desires for vendettas and vengeance, via the U.S. military, especially now as being made manifest in Ukraine, a mass blood-letting of Gentiles---or goy, if you will.
Their age-old hatred for Russia for having been banished to the Pale of Settlement by the Czars. And the fact they want the Ukraine back for themselves (Israel.) That they have long-blackmailed and extorted U.S. and other Western politicians (inc Presidents) and bureaucrats puts someone of Biden's *moral fiber* squarely in their crosshairs, and likely so going back to keeping a close watch on him and encouraging compromising incidents that were duly filmed or photographed, ala Epstein.
And speaking of Presidents and being compromised, I give you LBJ and the USS Liberty---why LBJ hushed that up and left them to endure ongoing repeated attacks. "We're not going to embarrass Israel..." I rather think he was thinking about his own blackmailed ass. The Mossad and its precursors had long utilized such tactics even before the state of Israel was 'consecrated.'
LBJ had already allowed them to steal a large quantity of nuclear weapons triggers from a "secure facility," enough to allow them to be the first outlaw nuclear state. The French---who built Dimona---had and have politicians too. Even Nelson Rockefeller was compromised and used when confronted by Israeli agents with evidence of his Nazi complicity during WW II.
What are the odds of a lifelong Catholic family such as Biden's having each and every son and daughter marrying Jews? Each and every one.
Storm clouds and lightning are moving our way. And we are so far down the wrong trail and night has fallen.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/joe-bidens-a-team-of-jewish-advisers-cabinet-members-and-staff-658350
There is much more going on elsewhere too, Christian Armenia for example. Evil kids turned loose in a candy store and determined to use all of the power at their disposal, including keeping the U.S. southern border flood gates wide open, Mr Mayorka's (one of the Chosen) purview.
Jake Sullivan was left out of the Jerusalem Post article. He was raised a religious Jew.
Ah, I wondered what the deal was with him. Thanks.
Michelangelo's Last Judgement and a Damned Soul... LIFE IMITATES ART
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/michaelangelos-last-judgement-and
This piece goes directly to answering the why. Why do the who do what they do? Supposing the who have been revealed to those w/ eyes to see, or more likely, ears to listen. Then the next big question is why. Why would a race/people want to destroy everything other peoples have built? Limited destruction is understandable, passing fits of mayhem as well. But murderers, rapists and vandals all have satiation points or at least down time, resting on laurels, riding off into the sunset after a job well done.
Perhaps a serial killer would be a type that transcends term limits and bypasses normal boundaries. No guilty conscience to impede his purpose. Obsession and compulsion rather than anger, envy and lust (classical human vices) fuel the quest for unending destruction.
Herve Ryssen has a couple of books which offer much insight into the why problem, but Craig has simply and concisely nailed the motivation as being a religious mission Straight Outta Deuteronomy. No other religious scripture comes close to the insistent gangsta insanity unleashed in the OT (The Holy Terror, er Torah).
Thank you for reminding me about Herve Ryssen. I heard about him for the first time when he was sentenced to prison in France for "Holocaust denial." I had forgotten his name but did want to explore his work. He's written a bunch of books on the subject of Jews. Anyone who will risk imprisonment just to state their views is a serious person.
Just now, searching his name, I came across this:
https://christiansfortruth.com/herve-ryssen-sent-to-prison-for-17-months-for-challenging-jewish-version-of-world-war-ii/
So, there is a strand of Christianity of which I was unaware.
I like this site. For Christians they're bold. They use the term Judeo-Masonic to categorize Judaizing Christians. I wish they'd take the next step and embrace Marcion's excision of the OT. Then and only then can Christianity stand on its own. On a less hopeful note, I see that Bitchute has shut down the Ryssen link.
Any particular title you recommend by Ryssen?
Psychoanalysis of Judaism, 450 pages, divided into 3 parts: Jewish Messianism, Cosmopolitan Personality and Psychopathology of Judaism. The paperback has an attractively symbolic cover by Marc Chagall. (got mine from Barnes Review $30)
Whine, whine, whine. Ya’ll whine about Deuteronomy, but never put it in context. I find that most critics of the Bible, don’t actually have a grasp of what it says, or cherry pick it and take it out of context, whether slightly or far makes no difference. And I think ya’ll do this to try to cover for your own sins and shortcomings before God. Do you think your word salads impress God? Study to show yourselves approved, rightly dividing The Word of God. Humility is the only key that unlocks understanding; otherwise you trap yourself in a self destructive loop.
Here, the day of the Lord comes why? “For the transgression of Jacob and the sins of the house of Israel”. Whine, whine ….Deuteronomy, Deuteronomy… conquer the world… whine, whine. That’s what you people sound like. But if you bothered to pursue God with your whole heart, and humble yourself, you’d be given proper eyes to put the entire OT into proper context.
1 The word of the Lord that came to Micah of Moresheth during the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah—the vision he saw concerning Samaria and Jerusalem.
2 Hear, you peoples, all of you,
listen, earth and all who live in it,
that the Sovereign Lord may bear witness against you,
the Lord from his holy temple.
Judgment Against Samaria and Jerusalem
3 Look! The Lord is coming from his dwelling place;
he comes down and treads on the heights of the earth.
4 The mountains melt beneath him
and the valleys split apart,
like wax before the fire,
like water rushing down a slope.
5 All this is because of Jacob’s transgression,
because of the sins of the people of Israel.
What is Jacob’s transgression?
Is it not Samaria?
What is Judah’s high place?
Is it not Jerusalem?
that's a thundering great quote! but I'm a simple sinner trying to understand. And I can't understand it. Would be kind enough to tell me what it means?
As many problems that people have with Thomas Jefferson, he was on to something when it comes to the Bible.
I have said many times that the OT needs to go. Thanks for the corroboration.
hah, you too!
See my comment below :-)
I am going to stop reading you.
You must decide what is True. Did Jesus, the Messiah (the Christ), rise from the dead or not? (1 Cor 15:14) You appear to deny that Jesus rose from the dead.
I agree with your struggle against the perfidious Jews, who are the enemy of all mankind. Plenty of non-Christian civilizations have recognized the damage that the parasitical Jews do. I wish you well in fighting their evil.
But you will only be successful against evil by firmly aligning yourself with Truth.
Choose you this day whom you will serve ...
Truth, yes, but, in my view, one's religious life is an intensely personal affair. No one has a claim on the details of anyone else's experience of the divine, and if such a claim existed, it would necessarily be on something less than divine.
One of the many things that enfeebles Christianity is this litmus religious test so many Christians apply to political figures. So some politician like George W Bush comes along and gives an interview "from his heart" detailing his deepest personal religious "convictions" and, on that basis, millions of evangelicals run out and put one of the worst presidents ever into office.
Dear Christians:
First, you are not God. You don't have the power to see into someone's "heart" through your TV screen and politicians have been known to bend the truth in order to get elected. In fact, someone who is vulgar enough to disgorge the intimate details of his personal religious life in public during a political campaign in order to get people to vote for him is probably unfit for office anyway.
Second, God doesn't give a fuck who the president of the United States is. I know that 99 percent of Christians will disagree with that, but it's true. Religion and politics are in completely different spheres. Just as religion and science are in completely different spheres.
I understood this truth early on. My Dad is a farmer and, as you can imagine, the weather plays a big role in a farmer's life. So when my Dad "asked the blessing" before meals, he would frequently ask God for more rain or for less rain, depending on the conditions outside. One day it struck me that there really was no difference between Dad's solemn entreaties for rain and a native American rain dance. So I suggested maybe we should get some indians to come do a rain dance because at least it was more colorful and there was dancing. Of course, to my Dad, this was about the most blasphemous thing that could possibly be said and he coldly rejected my suggestion.
But, of course, whether it rains or not has everything to do with atmospheric pressure systems and so on and nothing to do with some Supreme Being sitting up there sending rain to Farmer Smith's farm because he remembered to pray for it and not sending it to Farmer Brown's neighboring farm because he forgot it only hired rain dancers. The idea is absurd and makes our religion ridiculous.
Christianity needs to absorb that insight if it is going to have a hope of saving the civilization it claims as its own. God doesn't give a fuck whether it's raining at my Dad's place. God also didn't send hurricane Katrina to punish the homosexuals in New Orleans. Talk like that is the real blasphemy because the weather is entirely in the realm of science and has nothing to do with religion. There are Christians out there who will reply, But the Bible says His eye is on the sparrow, which only serves to illustrate just how foolish and crippling it is to insist on sacred magic books.
I get it that, to a farmer whose crops are burning up, praying for rain provides a certain psychological comfort that he's *doing something* about the drought, but a mental salve isn't the same thing as religious truth. The one thing the West really doesn't need is a pacifier.
Another thing about prayer: too often I've seen people avoid doing something difficult but morally necessary by saying they would "pray about it." What they were really saying was they weren't going to do anything, but would pretend they were in order to make themselves feel better about failing in their moral duty. Christianity needs to reexamine the whole "talking to God" thing. God doesn't even speak English, for crying out loud, She speaks Yiddish. And as for those send-money-and-we-will-pray-for-you outfits....
To answer your question whether I believe Jesus rose from the dead: I can see the argument Dostoevsky makes in defense of the Resurrection, which is every bit as strong as the argument Bach makes in St Matthew's Passion. Both men were Christians and geniuses *as artists*. Dostoevsky even described the coming of the Bolsheviks accurately in his novel "Demons" published something like 60 years (!) before the revolution, so the man had penetrating insight to say the least. But he portrayed Jewish characters in his novels accurately --some better than others, some worse--which means he wasn't nearly the literary giant Elie Wiesel was, but I respect his grasp of Truth probably more than anyone else's. But, when it comes right down to it, religion is all about how we treat one another. That's it's entire realm. And, really, I don't really get how it makes all that much difference in the way I treat you whether I believe Jesus rose from the dead. I think Jesus would agree with me.
I think I understand Truth Seeker's point of view. Because I've found it in two of the more radical Protestant sects {Jehovah's Witnesses and Seven Day Adventists}. They are adamant that Eternal Life comes purely from (blind) Faith because that is the best they can cope with. Not everyone is able to think for themself. The path of faith suits such people. Unfortunately the teaching can be quite limiting.
Here are two examples:
First, that by handing off responsibility for action to the Divine they are able to avoid conflict with the authorities - useful if you want to have a successful religious organisation. But it comes at the cost of a closed mind instead of being one who wrestles with his responsibility to live a Christ like life. Such 'people avoid doing something difficult but morally necessary by saying they would "pray about it."...' because that is the best they are able to do. Altho sometimes I wonder if they aren't just two faced lying hypocrites who live in the 'false consciousness' of thinking they are outwitting their God. So stupid that they think an entirely self interested, outward show of faith is sufficient to get them thru St. Peter's Gate.
Second, most believers are normal people, not intellectuals, and so are unable to see the hypocrisy of their sect's position. The ability to cater to the less intellectual is both the advantage and the limitation of a religion based upon faith. Both sects rely upon the 'Word' as being divine and their interpretation of it is the only latitude allowed. Sad, really, but what can you do with people who can't think for themselves? They rely upon their betters for the interpretation and, I'd say, have been mislead down a wide and easy to follow path.
Then of course there are the Zionist Christians who adamantly deny that Jews worship Lucifer. Which is just sad. No doubt when they unwittingly follow Satan into battle they will convince themselves that their 'enemy', Jesus in all his Glory and backed by the Saints, is a false image, mere devilish trickery. Armageddon could be close run cock up!
Strangely enough the Bible does mention these failings. I believe it says that there will be many who think themselves saved but are mistakenly following the teachings of Satan. I'd put the bulk of the 70m or so American Evangelicals in that category.
Not that the Catholics are much better - there are those of them who have made a good case for the argument that the current pope is the anti-Christ. I would go along with that since he is a friend of Soros' and hangs out with Mrs. Rothschild - participating in her Council for Inclusive Capitalism.
"They rely upon their betters for the interpretation and, I'd say, have been misled down a wide and easy to follow path."
We desperately need a Christianity 2.0. If the path must be wide and easy, it should at least be leading to the proper destination.
"Then of course there are the Zionist Christians who adamantly deny that Jews worship Lucifer. Which is just sad."
Christian Zionists, in my experience, are the most stubbornly ignorant people on the planet. They see clearly that their civilization is collapsing around them, and that their enemies are in power over them, but they simply will not consider the possibility that God's Chosen People might be their enemy or that the very concept of a universal God even having such a thing as a "chosen people" is absurd and a logical impossibility. Christian Zionists, in my experience, are the quickest to react with anger to and sever a relationship rather than engage with a challenge of their beliefs--surely not a religiously defensible response. I have pity for them as they have been duped by the masters of deception. They feel the same pain we do watching it all go down the drain, but they feel it even worse as they are alone in an incomprehensible and lethal world. But they are still my people and I want to help them if I can only figure out how to do that.
Thanks for the good comment.
"We desperately need a Christianity 2.0"
I wonder if you realise the humongous changes that are needed - in my opinion.
Christians have, by and large, sanitised the Old Testament. For instance they gloss over that 'giving' the seed of Abraham the Promised Land consisted of the Jewish God giving them the victories that enabled them to ethnically cleanse 'their' Land. A whole society, happily living their lives - genocided by the Jews. Christians tend to forget that the Jews worship Satan. That their god is 'a murderer and the father of lies'. Jesus may have been situated in an Old Testament culture. But the Greek Jews who wrote the Gospels defined a new God, a Christian God. One who has nothing to do with child sacrifice (Abraham, Issac?) or genocide. The new God rejects an eye for an eye and instead exhorts us to turn the other cheek.
Christianity v 1.0 is Judaeo-Christianity.
Christianity v 2.0 should reject all the satanic vestiges - and ditch the OT. Or use it as an example of how evil people can be and to explain why Jesus was sent to reform Judaism. He did. It ended in 70AD with only his followers surviving. Modern 'Jews' follow the Talmud and that is a somewhat different religion but with the same god - Satan.
It seems to me that Christianity v 1.0 was anti-jewish. v 2.0 became what we have now.
We need a v 3.0 doing exactly what you list.
I'm neither a good Christian nor an optimist. I'd be happy to settle for a return to v 1.0
In 70 AD, when the Romans, invited into Jerusalem in the first place by the Pharisees to assist them in some internal political struggle, finally threw up their hands in exasperation and razed the place, there were *two* little bands that survived as I understand it--Jesus' followers and the Pharisees, themselves. Jesus' followers headed west toward Rome and the Pharisees moved the rabbinical government to somewhere in Syria. And, from that day to the present, Jesus' followers have been the objects of the genocidal hatred of the Talmudic center.
The rabbis seem poised for a final victory and I don't see any path out of our doom, save one very narrow, difficult one--the one that would require the "humongous changes" you note. Only the intensity of a religious revolution on that scale could generate the power necessary to break the rabbis' stranglehold on us in time to save our civilization.
So, the question becomes: how does one start a religious revolution? The only way I can think of is to follow Jesus, or, anyway, take his claim seriously that the truth shall set us free.
"We desperately need a Christianity 2.0."
Possibly. I mean sure we need to update Christianity but whether or not we actually need a religion? I'm less sure about that. What we do need is an education system that inculcates those values that make for good people and good citizens. Christianity used to fill that role (when it inspired the curriculum) but sadly our children are now indoctrinated with the values pushed by Cultural Marxism.
A long time ago, I read a book called "Reason and Emotion" by a Scottish philosopher named John MacDonald in which he laid out the three spheres in which humans express rationality: Science, Art, and Religion. Science is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with the physical world, Art is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with humanity, Religion is the means by which we express rationality in our relationship with each other.
His formulation stuck with me and has gained explanatory power for me over the years. So many human catastrophes can be laid at the feet of attempts to mix spheres. Marxist materialism's attempt to apply Science to Politics (which is in the sphere of Art) is a great example, or, vice versa, the climate change boondoggle when Politics is applied to Science. Priests have nothing to say about Science or Art as priests. Politicians have nothing to say about Religion or Science as politicians--we can't pass a law against love or gravity. There is no scientific way to measure someone's pain at the betrayal of a lover.
So, from his point of view, it means as much to say we don't need religion as it does to say we don't need science. They are both just there. I can say I don't believe in Science, but gravity is still going to work.
I think a big problem we have is that our religious development is still very very primitive compared to our scientific development. Religiously, we are at the stage of development Science was when we were throwing virgins into volcanoes to make the corn grow. But our Religious development has been severely retarded by this idea that because something is "written" that's the final and permanent religious truth and there can never be any religious progress beyond "God's word."
Nevertheless, I agree with you on the disastrous state of public education, which belongs in the sphere of Art. :)
nice one!
I hold that the nature of 'religion' has been confused. As you point out with that terrible waste of a good virgin.
Lets go back to say 10,000BC. Language is getting useful and with it comes the beginnings of personal identity. (The concept of 'I' is changing from being body centred to the stories we tell ourselves about our self.) Man seeks to understand, and develops concepts to explain stuff. Such as orgasmic sky god has the thrill of orgasm (lightning) and then .... which cums as rain upon Mother Earth.
Obviously all this reality was created by an older, bigger god. Brahma or Jehovah or Cronos. And they knew this because the shaman explained it to them and thus they taught their kids. Who then grew up thinking God was an old shaman with a white beard sitting on a cloud etc.
Some smart arse starting writing all this down and there is your Holy Book. Which is not wrong. Just (mis)understood by us within the terms of our culture when it only works within the terms of the culture that created it.
So what is religion? Its Holy Books are the truths left behind by earlier cultures. One truth is the idea of 'God'. Another is the trope of the god that dies and is reborn - possibly based upon their experience of harvesting corn and then planting it next year. So now we confuse having 'faith' in Jesus, with a belief in him dying on the cross only to be reborn, with the wisdom of his teachings. That mishmash is the religion of the common man.
But there is also mysticism whereby the mortal (if he is 'blessed') may experience an intimidation of immortality. A 'moment of Clarity'. That, as most of now realize, is the product of a trained mind generating a specific psychological state {sometimes called a Kensho} and then placing that mystical experience within a religious frame work. Its not religious at all! But if its placed in a religious framework the enlightened monk becomes the Zen Master or a Saint and the values and teachings of the common religion appears to be validated by his mystical experience.
Teaching those values are a great way of inculcating children with those positive attitudes that will result in a civilized society. Similarly a faith in Christ may offer great psychological and emotional support when a parent has to resolve their grief over the loss of a child (for instance). Modern psychotherapy has no story that offers the emotional support such as that given by the priest when he reassures a devout catholic her child is now with Jesus in heaven and is living in Glory.
Like I say, the nature of 'religion' has been confused. Is it an early form of scientific explanation, a path to the Divine, a form of social control or a refuge for the common man?
So I agree with MacDonald. Things should be limited to their own particular sphere. Ergo, I think Christianity 2.0 is possible but it would entail jettisoning a lot of baggage and a serious re-write of the Truth. Just as the Greek culture took the Jewish teachings and rewrote them in harmony with Greek philosophy. That is the sort of revision it needs
does this need an edit ?
"sending rain to Farmer Smith's farm because he remembered to pray for it and not sending it to Farmer Brown's neighboring farm because he forgot it only hired rain dancers."
As a polished piece of prose, one ready for publication to the general public, it should be smoothed out. But in any long piece on Substack, you'll find all kinds of grammatical errors and typos. I have a very good spell-check operating and still I make mistakes even in relatively short responses. And like you, I have a demon's eye for noticing breaks in the syntactic flow. "Catholic schoolin' and a couple of years as a proofreader'll do that to ya." So as a fellow formalist, I can tell you from experience, you won't garner much praise on earth or shorten your stay in purgatory from such pedantic endeavors. Better to concentrate on the content unless the mistake is truly interesting enough to provoke discussion.
No, no, you misunderestimate me. Or at least my motives. The prose is so good that I'd assumed the author would want to correct that one little mishap. I wasn't being critical, I was trying to help.
By the way, twas well put. Respect!
The road to hello is paved w/ good intentions.
Yes, thanks, it should be "neighboring farm because he forgot OR only hired rain dancers."
Written on my phone.
You are quite the mixed bag of internal rage and honest desire for the truth.
I agree that politics and Christianity are incompatible - “Do not be entangled in the affairs of this world”. Trump is the master of dancing evangelicals around. But the reason for this, is connected to your thoughts about prayer, and about a “wide and easy path”.
The New Testament is not an easy pill to swallow. Most people want a nice, gentle, easy to accept Jesus. But when you actually read what is said in the gospels and in the letters to the churches in Revelation - man, some very difficult things are said.
The reason that Christians fall for Trump & Bush, and the reason that prayer seems feeble, is because Christians generally don’t live the consecrated life that is required of them. Living the disciplined life is difficult in modern society. Most Christians are seduced by modernity (prosperity).
“The fervent, effective prayer of a righteous man avails to much”.
Look at the words in that verse - fervent - effective - righteous. They are telling you something about how prayer works. Most mumbled prayers do not ascend to heaven. Prayer is work. Prayer is discipline. Prayer requires an internal holiness . Clean thoughts. Clean diet. Intensely focused life. Disciplined reading of the Bible. Fasting often. Prayer is a huge responsibility and most of humanity fail at doing it correctly because they are weakened by their own sin (laziness, worldliness, lack of self control).
As to a “wide and easy path”….OMG. Imagine that you are God and you are going to convey immortality to humans. You are going to make them as lower gods (angels). Would you throw the gates wide open to all the degenerates that populate most of the face of the earth? Or would you reserve the right to a “few good men”? “Narrow is the gate and few there be that find it.” What you suggest is like lowering the standards to the military; and what you end up with is a weak and undisciplined military. (And that’s just for analogy purposes, because I disagree with the military industrial complex).
I think ultimately that you want to justify your own sin. Have at it. You’ll reap what you sow.
Psalm 53:2 “God looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are any who understand, who seek God.”
>>As to a “wide and easy path”….OMG. Imagine that you are God and you are going to convey immortality to humans. You are going to make them as lower gods (angels). Would you throw the gates wide open to all the degenerates that populate most of the face of the earth? <<
But, my area of interest isn't in how Heaven should be administered. My sole purpose in writing this blog is to try to come to grips with the intentional destruction of our civilization, which is occurring right in front of us. Maybe grope my way forward with a group of like-minded people toward some sort of resistance to our annihilation.
The subscription aspect of the Substack model provides me with a sense of obligation to my subscribers. That sense of obligation forces me to think carefully about my subject matter, to learn as much as I can about it, to draw conclusions judiciously from what I learn, and to work hard to make reading my posts as worthwhile as possible for my readers, every last one of whom, for all I know, may be neck-deep in stark raving, full-blown, foaming-at-the-mouth degeneracy.
Frankly, one degenerate who shares my desire to understand the nature of the world around us as accurately as possible--who believes it is noble to fight for his people, is worth more than a whole host of saints too busy fine-tuning Heaven's guest list to organize against genocide.
>>I think ultimately that you want to justify your own sin. Have at it. You’ll reap what you sow. <<
Isn't there something in your sacred magic book about judging not, lest ye be judged?
The difference between us is, that I think the enemy is spiritually animated and must be spiritually resisted. Your idea about gathering an army of degenerates is silly and you are too smart for such a comment. Look how most rolled right over for the virus scam. That lie was so apparent on the face of it, and yet most sinners lined right up (and a whole lot of saints too, such is the weak condition of the church right now). And IF you could even gather ten strong men, where would you start? Who’s door would you knock on first to “resist”? And then how far do you think you’d get?
“Judge not”, a favorite dodge of sinners. The word judgment is not so singularly defined. Just like the recent popular motto among some sinners, that “love is love”, as though love is simple.
True, Jesus ate with sinners of all stripes, but said to the woman caught in adultery - “go an sin no more”. And he had scathing comments for the religious degenerates. Think of the word for context: de-generate. To stop or reverse generation. That is more than just people sticking needles in their arms and overdosing on fentanyl. It’s the entire system of the Synagogue of Satan, The Vatican, as well as the common drunkard, pervert, idolator, etc.
I have no power of judgment, but I can point out the obvious. I don’t turn my nose up to any man. Heck, I would love to see Justin Trudeau and Gavin Newsom repent.
Might I suggest that religions tend to hope to attract the righteous to the religious life but are mostly meeting the needs of ordinary men.
"Most Christians are seduced by modernity (prosperity)."
Because most Christians are ordinary men, trying to do the right thing - live a decent life in a society dominated by consumerism.
There are very few who aspire to become a saint, who will give up family life and take up a life of prayer. Such are usually found in monasteries. Because 'Living the disciplined life is difficult in modern society.'
So while I agree with your observations I think it unfair to judge all by the same standards. Most church going Christians are just decent honest folk caring for their family and friends best they can. I would not judge them by the standards that are applied to those who have dedicated their life to the Divine.
I will get back to you on all your comments in a bit. I am preoccupied and don’t want to be hasty. It may take me a day or 2.
It is crystal clear that you have no understanding of the Bible. You probably don't understand the reason there is an "Old Testament" and a "New Testament." But they are inseparable. You cannot have one without the other.
The Old Testament is a physical picture of a spiritual plan. Just because the unbelieving jews have used the OT as a license to justify their evil and greed, does NOT mean that is what God is saying.
It is GOD's Book; not the Jews book. You are caught between two lies: one that says the Jews have special privileged and therefore can do as they please, and two that Jesus is coming back to set up a "Jewish" kingdom.
I would like for you (or anyone) to explain this verse:
Romans 9:6 (KJV) "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:"
How can "Israel" not be of "Israel"? Because it is not a physical, earthly people, kingdom, or goal. This earth and this life are temporary. You think when we get in eternity, there are re going to be races and nationalities? There are going to verify some surprised and disappointed people. The same God that had Moses write Deuteronomy is the same God that had Peter and Paul (both Jews) write respectively:
1 Peter 1:17 (KJV) And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
Romans 10:12 (KJV) For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
I agree with your assessment of the greed and evil of the globalist/Zionist Jewish cabal and the clear history of their schemes and machinations. But I do NOT agree that the Bible in any way justifies them or those that think they are special.
You need to take a look inward and realize this:
1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV) "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."
You cannot see through the eyes of a carnal man and know what is going on in the world.