Rape Denial

A new Holocaust is set to join the old one on the list of things thou shalt not deny

The latest audio installment of Red Terror in Russia 1918 - 1923 (Ch. 6, part B) by Serge Melgunov has been posted here. Here is a bit from this installment describing a “scary creek” where CheKa, the Bolshevik political police, conducted executions during summers and autumns.

Eyewitness:

As soon as the snow melts, the friends and families of the dead sneak to the creek, single and in groups, looking over their shoulders in fear. At first the visitors were being arrested, but there were so many of them, and they kept coming despite the arrests. The flood waters exposed the victims of communist persecution by washing away dirt. The corpses were thrown from an overpass, piling up in a 50 square meter area [roughly six basketball courts]. How many? Who knows? Even CheKa itself does not know. Approximately 1500 persons, with and without documentation, were executed in 1918 and 1919. But the executions took place above the creek in summer and autumn only, elsewhere in winter. The most recent corpses, executed late last autumn, were not yet decomposed. Wearing nothing but underwear, with their hands tied behind their backs, sometimes in sacks or completely naked...

It is terrifying to look into the depths of that ravine! But the visitors look, looking for any marks that would allow them to identify the body of a relative...

...And with every day that creek becomes scarier and scarier for the residents of Saratov. It consumes more and more victims. The steep slope slides after every execution, burying the dead; the creek widens. But, every spring, flood waters unearth the latest execution victims...

OK, now here’s an account from Daily Caller of a piece in The New York Times on Thursday reporting what a woman claims she witnessed during the October 7 attack in Israel. See whether you can detect any difference between this eyewitness account and the eyewitness account above from The Red Terror in Russia.

Eyewitness:

A witness to the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks shared her account of Hamas’ graphic rape and torture¹ of Israeli women at the Supernova Music Festival, The New York Times reported on Thursday.

Sapir, 24, was at the rave on the morning of the attacks and told Israeli police that after being shot and hiding in a bush, she watched the rape of five women by Hamas terrorists, who often tortured their victims as well, according to the NYT.

By this point, one already should have serious doubts as to the veracity of this news story.

The woman said one female was raped while being stabbed every time she flinched, another woman was “shredded into pieces” and yet another victim’s breast was cut off with a box cutter before slicing her face.

“One continues to rape her, and the other throws her breast to someone else, and they play with it, throw it, and it falls on the road,” Sapir said.

And by this point, it should be clear that this story is a complete fabrication. It’s almost like a parody.

Sapir said that three other women were raped and that some of the terrorists were carrying around the heads of three more women, according to the NYT. Yura Karol, 22, a friend of Sapir’s also witnessed several of the women being raped and murdered.

But Yura also doesn’t have a camera on her phone, apparently.

Let’s see how outrageously ridiculous we can make it and the Christians will still lap it up.

Sapir took several photographs, that she showed the police, of where she hid and her injuries

So, she showed the police a picture of a bush and her bullet hole, but, I guess, figured no one would be interested in pics of the three terrorists playing hacky sack with the murdered Jewess’ breast, so she didn’t bother to take one. Or else she was too traumatized by what she was witnessing to take any pics of the actual crime, but, after it was over and the now empty-handed Palestinian men ran off to either try to capture more hostages or escape back to Gaza empty-handed, Sapir regained her composure and, emerging from the bush, brushed off some dried leaves and twigs stuck to her blouse and, with the chaos and gun battles raging all around her, and the missiles screaming overhead, snapped a picture of…the bush. Not of the piles of shredded Jewess…not of the pools of blood left by the five shredded plus three beheaded women…not even of the severed breast. She took a picture of the bush.

and said she thought to herself at the time that she “should remember everything,” according to the NYT.

OK, well, if she thought that at the time, then that proves she’s telling the truth.

“That day, I became an animal,” she said. “I was emotionally detached, sharp, just the adrenaline of survival. I looked at all this as if I was photographing them with my eyes, not forgetting any detail. I told myself: I should remember everything.”

This sounds like that emotionally disturbed woman who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse team of gang-raping her—the same titillated breathlessness.

Raz Cohen and Shoam Gueta, who were also at the festival, told the NYT that they watched multiple Hamas fighters get out of a van with a naked screaming woman. Gueta said that the men were “giggling” while stabbing their victim and “butchering her.”

“They all gather around her,” Cohen said. “She’s standing up. They start raping her. I saw the men standing in a half circle around her. One penetrates her. She screams. I still remember her voice, screams without words.”

A search for the phrase, “screams without words,” on Google yields “About 41,300 results (0.17 seconds).” Almost all of the ones I looked at were reprints or accounts of the New York Times story. For some media outlets—The Times of Israel, for example—the story is the New York Times story itself. Look! The NYT printed this! For the majority of media outlets—in the US, Israel, India, Argentina, Canada, Australia, and more—the story was a straight news report, as if describing actual events that really occurred. The phrase also turns up in places not related to Oct 7. Interestingly, it turned up in a number of Holocaust-related contexts.

Emergency responders testified to seeing the dead bodies of several women with their pants and underwear down below their knees and that one woman appeared to have had her genital area “sliced open,” according to the NYT. A film compiled by the Israeli military and previously viewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation showed photos of women at the rave missing clothes and legs bent in unnatural positions.

So where are those photos?

The Israeli military has not publicly stated how many women were sexually assaulted by Hamas on Oct. 7 and is gathering evidence, according to the NYT. However, the police admitted that in the aftermath of the attacks, conducting a thorough investigation of the scenes often did not take place due to the focus on eliminating Hamas.

In other words, yeah, we don’t have any actual physical evidence (of all this cartoonishly evil butchery that we’re hearing about for the first time nearly three months after the fact, or even evidence) of these rapes, like, you know, discarded severed breasts, and so on, because, um, we were helping the army, you know, aim missiles at Palestinian children and stuff like that.

Here’s the scenario the New York Times wants us to buy. In the middle of the chaos of October 7, with gun battles raging between Palestinians and Israelis, with Israeli Apache helicopters firing missiles at anything that moved, with the Palestinian fighters racing to capture hostages to use as bargaining chips for the Palestinian hostages Israel was for some reason already holding, with all that going on, a group of Palestinian fighters who’d already captured their hostages decided it was a good time to stop and do some rapin’. But instead of dragging the captive Jewesses back to Gaza as their mission required and just raping them there in the safety of their lair, they stop on the Israeli side of the border to get it in. And they happened to stop right there where Sapir and Yuron and Raz and Shoam were sprinkled about, hidden in the bushes—hidden well enough they weren’t noticed through five whole rapes, even with other terrorists passing through (carrying heads for some reason), but not well enough they could risk using their cameras, but still close enough they could distinguish the flinches of the victims and the moments of penetration and the giggling of the rapists because their eyes were “sharpened” by adrenaline, which made them just as good as cameras because they told themselves to remember everything.

Well, I don’t buy it.

Here’s what I do buy: there are indeed depraved monsters rampaging through the ancient land of Palestine.

For some reason, when Jews, by far the most prolific mass murderers of the 20th Century, commit mass murder, they like to make their victims take off their clothes. What’s that about? Make them more like animals?

(You can view the video of the Israelis urinating on the dead Palestinians at

The Great Reject

)

If we can tell just from reading a description of it that the New York Times’ Hamas rape story is pure bullshit, how is it that the well-paid professionals at the most influential media outlet in the world were taken in by it? The answer is: they weren’t. This is yet another example of The New York Times knowingly lying to its readers in furtherance of Zionist interests.

The Jewish Daily Forward complained the NYT report was “too little, too late” in an editorial titled, “Will anything make the world take Hamas’ sexual violence seriously?” (believability, maybe?)

Even the overwhelming evidence in the Times investigation is being met with denial and diminishment. Because ultimately, nothing — not a blockbuster investigation, not survivors testifying to the carnage they witnessed, not even substantial forensic evidence — will ever be enough to make Israelis human and worthy of sympathy in the eyes of many.

It’s that “substantial forensic evidence” that we’re missing, here, Jewish Daily Forward. There isn’t any. Nor do you offer any. Which makes me think your claim that it exists is just another knowing Jewish lie in furtherance of Zionist interests, because if it actually did exist, you’d present it.

The Forward is more concerned that we buy the NYT’s blood libel against the Palestinians than they are about any kind of journalistic ethical standard, and if we don’t buy it, it’s because we don’t consider Israelis to be human. The author of the opinion piece, Laura Adkins, even goes so far as to use the term “rape denial” to describe our skepticism of the ludicrous claims in the NYT story.

And that’s not the only similarity between the Rape Holocaust story and another famous Jewish Holocaust story, the denial of which can land you in prison in subjugated places like Europe and Florida. As Adkins acknowledges in her piece,

It is true that the extent to which sexual violence featured in the Oct. 7 attack was at first unclear. In the attack’s immediate aftermath, authorities’ focus was on identifying and burying the dead with dignity, not fastidiously documenting evidence sexual violence. Delays in reporting the evidence that did emerge allowed bad actors and skeptics alike ample time to spread disinformation and denial.

In other words, Israeli-hating deniers were out there denying the allegations of rape before the allegations were even made. The same argument is used to explain the very curious delay in reporting the granddaddy of Holocausts, the ones Jews suffered at the hands of the Nazis. That Holocaust only began receiving attention with the publication in 1961 of Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews—16 years after the event. And that Holocaust, too, relied on “blockbuster investigation” and “survivors testifying to the carnage they witnessed,” for proof it occurred—proof that has never included “substantial forensic evidence.”

One of the benefits of learning about history through source materials (as opposed to, say, Hollywood movies) is it helps us recognize fabrications like those printed by the New York Times. So check out the audio clips of The Red Terror in Russia.

1. The writer of the Daily Caller piece, “Kate Anderson,” probably transcribed this sentence incorrectly. The account should be “graphic,” not the rape and torture itself.