If You but Knew How Dark the Night Is around Us
Only a madman is incapable of knowing what force of evil and destruction is represented by these savages of Europe
Audio version:
“I am accustomed at the present time rather to judge world events and world tendencies from the point of view of whether they are Bolshevist or anti-Bolshevist,” began a speech Winston Churchill gave in London on November 4, 1920. It was a period of labor unrest in Great Britain and Bolshevists could be found, said Churchill, among radical elements within the British trade unions. He characterized them as “an active and very voluble minority which is always trying to grab the control of the organization.”
But the goals of the British Bolsheviks weren’t confined to gaining control of the trade unions, Churchill warned. “This minority has a perfectly definite and avowed intention of trying to wreck the whole system of society,” he said, “and to wreck it by any means, however violent and however wicked, that may be within their reach…”
At the time of Churchill’s speech, the Bolshevik Revolution was three years old and the “dictatorship of the proletariat” had adopted mass murder of its own citizens as government policy. “Nothing can exceed the appalling character of the conditions” in Russia, Churchill told his audience, which are “solely due to the Bolshevists, and are solely due to a very few men…to a revolutionary and terrible sect of fanatics, whose devastating doctrines have laid Russia low…and will lay every nation low in which they obtain ascendancy.”
These Bolshevists were “a deadly and paralysing sect that destroyed Russia and plunged it deep into unspeakable misery,” Churchill continued. “We must never cease proclaiming this fact as a warning to other nations in the world, and for the preservation of our own country. The Bolshevists are responsible for the catastrophe.”
Bolshevist activity wasn’t confined only to Russia and Britain, Churchill said. “In every city there are small bands of eager men and women watching with hungry eyes for any chance” to overthrow society for the benefit of themselves. Moreover, “[i]t is becoming increasingly clear,” he said, “that all these factions are in touch with one another, and that they are acting in concert. In fact there is developing a world-wide conspiracy…”
A world-wide Bolshevist conspiracy developing? What about the genocide this developing conspiracy was already committing against Russia?
Churchill:
For Russia we can do little. The fearful series of events must run their course. One can only hope that some day in our own time deliverance will come to the Russian people and that they will stand again on their own feet and be masters in their own house.
Yes, yes, we must hope. Maybe even pray.
Serge Melgunov describes what happened in Archangelsk “soon after the departure of the British troops” in the spring of 1920. After a “pompous funeral of empty red coffins,” the massacres began. All that summer, “the city moaned under the burden of Red Terror.”
Not once during his speech did Churchill mention the fact that Bolshevism was a Jewish movement. But just nine months earlier, on February 8, 1920, an article Churchill wrote was published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (London) with the title, “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” in which Churchill identified a “world-wide conspiracy” of “international Jews” as the “mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century” whose goal was the “overthrow of civilization.” This conspiracy of international Jews had “gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head” and “had become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
In other words, Churchill was fully aware that the slaughter in Russia was ethnic—that Bolshevism was a Jewish movement—that the massacres, for example, in Archangelsk the previous summer upon the withdrawal of British troops, were Jewish massacres of gentiles.
And yet, for Russia we can do little.
In 1919, the Russian Liberation Committee issued a pamphlet titled, “Russia's Call to Humanity ‘Save Our Souls’ : An Appeal to the Allies,” by Leonid Andreyev.
Mr. Andreyev wrote,
Because now, after one and a half years of domination by the Bolsheviks in Russia, and their activities in Germany and other countries, only a madman is incapable of knowing what force of evil and destruction is represented by these savages of Europe, against whose culture, laws and morals they have risen…one must be either savage like the Bolsheviks themselves or suffer from some moral infirmity to remain unmoved at their inhuman conduct and call it by any other name than crime, murder, lies and robbery…
and genocide.
Mr. Andreyev:
Not to the Governments…do I turn with my crying prayer: "Save Our Souls" (S.O.S). No, not to them, but to You, people of Europe, in whose nobility I unalterably believe, as I have always believed.
Like a wireless operator on a sinking steamer that through the night and the darkness sends the last calls, "Quickly, to our aid. We are sinking. Save Our Souls," so also I, moved by my faith in human clemency, throw into the dark space my prayer of perishing human beings. If you but knew how dark the night is around us, there are no words to describe this darkness. Whom do I call? I do not know.
But does the wireless operator know whom he calls? It is possible that for a thousand miles the sea is deserted and that there is no living soul to hear his prayer. The night is dark. It is possible that someone in the distance will hear the prayer, and say to himself: "Why should I go so far? I might perish myself," — and then continues his nocturnal, invisible path.
But he believes, and he calls persistently, to the very last moment, as long as there is a glimmer of light, and the powerless radio has not yet become silent for ever.
In what does he believe?
He believes in man even as I. He believes in the law of human love and life: it must not be that one man should not help another when he is perishing. It cannot be that one man, without struggle or aid, shall deliver up another to the sea and to death. It cannot be that no one should come to the aid of him who calls. Someone must come. I do not know his name, but I discern clearly his human features, his soul, akin to mine. Through the cold and the gloom I almost feel the warm contact of his energetic and friendly hand, tense with the will to assist and with human sympathy. I perceive this will to assist, which makes his muscles tense, his vision keen, and gives light and decision to his quick and firm human mind. I see him, I know him, I await him — that is man…
My friend, rise and stretch out a hand to us. Every individual Frenchman — I turn to you and call to you. What if your leaders are weak or in error — repair their error, and with your strength increase and reinforce their strength…
And you, every individual Englishman — I turn to you — save our souls…you are that man whose word is akin to law… It is enough to say but one word, man, in order to recognize the Englishman. Rise then, man, and stretch out a hand: human beings are perishing here, women and children.
And you, every individual American — I call to you. You are young and rich, you are broad in spirit and energetic, you desire that the torch of your Freedom shall throw its light on distant Europe also — come then and see, in what agony we are, in what inhuman servitude our body and spirit are struggling. If you would but see, I assure you, you would be terrified and you would curse those deceivers and liars who have represented this most evil tyranny to you as a break on the part of the whole Russian people for liberty…
My last call is to you, journalist, whosoever you may be, an Englishman, an American, or a Frenchman: support my prayer for perishing human beings. I know: hundreds of millions of money are being spent in buying the Press, thousands of Presses are fabricating and throwing out lies, thousands of liars are shouting, clamouring, muddying the water, peopling the world with monstrous phantoms and masks, among which the living human face becomes lost. The air itself has been bought and is full of lies…
But I know another thing: …there are also human beings among journalists…it is to them that I turn ... to each one individually, each one individually. Help! You know in what danger is man — help!
But quickly. Quickly.
What else shall I say to you, my friend? Quickly — come quickly.
Leonid Andreyev (1871-1919)
Did we come quickly? No, but we were hoping for their deliverance someday. Meanwhile, the machinery of genocide ground on, chewing up the Russian people. Two decades and tens of millions of victims later—at least four whole Holocausts’ worth—we in the United States again noticed Russia. This time it was to ally with them against the Germans—to ally with the very same criminals butchering Russian families against a people who hadn’t yet sent a single Jew to a gas chamber—real or imaginary. And while the gentile West was helping the monsters who ruled Russia destroy gentile Germany, the monsters didn’t even slow down their genocide of gentile Russia.
And, no individual gentile did more to help the Jews destroy Germany than Winston Churchill, who was, by then, the British prime minister. Churchill, the man who threw up his impotent little hands and abandoned the Russian gentiles to mass murder, somehow found the steely resolve to order the incineration from the air of the residential areas of German cities (at night, when they were full of German gentiles).
Any gentile who is “pro-Israel” is a deeply immoral, mentally sick traitor to their people, to their God, and to humanity. It’s no longer possible to claim to have been “honestly mistaken”—to have been doctrinally or politically or philosophically or scripturally in error. Because now, after four months of open genocide by the Zionists in Gaza, and their activities on 9/11, and in Ukraine and other countries, only a madman is incapable of knowing what force of evil and destruction is represented by these savages of Europe, against whose culture, laws and morals they have risen…one must be either savage like the Zionists themselves or suffer from some moral infirmity to remain unmoved at their inhuman conduct and call it by any other name than crime, murder, lies and robbery…
and genocide.
I knew that Churchill was aware of the Jewish nature of the Bolsheviks, and always wondered how he came to ally his country with the Soviets against Germany later in WWII.
But I did not know how quickly he moved from calling out the Jew in February 1920 to "appeasement" mode in November 1920. What a bloody hypocrite.
He must still be sizzling in hell.
"Any gentile who is “pro-Israel” is a deeply immoral, mentally sick traitor to their people, to their God, and to humanity. It’s no longer possible to claim to have been “honestly mistaken”—to have been doctrinally or politically or philosophically or scripturally in error."
Yes, it's true. It has been a long disturbing road to awakening to the Zionist agenda after a lifetime of being told they are innocent victims, despised because (so we are told) they "killed Christ." Well, that was the least of their sins as it turns out. Coming to accept the truth is mind-blowing. It is like finding yourself become a flat earther; "Am I really starting to agree w/ the Nazis and anti-Semites of all times? Can it be true? But the evidence is mounting, and the truth that has been hidden for thousands of years is coming to light as Aquarius dawns. All that is done in secret will be revealed. It's a ginormous mindfuck, but the truth is the truth and doesn't care about your feelings (to paraphrase one Zionist).