Escaping Our Own Gaza City

Western support for the Talmudic world program is leading to the genocide of the Palestinian people, and that will slam the door shut on any hope we had of escaping our own Gaza City

Here are the Wikipedia descriptions for three different American media companies:

1. [Company] is an online magazine that covers current affairs, politics, and culture in the United States…¹

2. [Company] is a multinational news channel and website…²

3. [Company] is a far-[blank], pro-[blank] cable news and political opinion commentary channel…

You can tell already that the Wikipedia editors ideologically disfavor the third company. It’s not even necessary to fill in the blanks with “far-right, pro-Trump.” The first two companies, Slate and CNN, respectively, are described as they would describe themselves. The third one, One America News (OAN), is not.³

Those of us paying attention watched with dismay as Wikipedia morphed over the years from an open repository of the world’s knowledge into one more example of a gentile innovation ruthlessly commandeered and transformed into a Jewish-controlled information choke point. A general outline of the process by which this was accomplished can be found in this March 12, 2018 article, “Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets,” published on the website of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). In a nutshell, the SPLC, in league with far-left editors on the site, used its deadly poison pen to name-call independent-minded editors off the site.

The SPLC hate map taken from the Wikipedia page on “hate groups”

The success of that campaign resulted in a Wikipedia that publishes the SPLC’s poisonous and blatantly fraudulent list of “hate groups” as something like real knowledge. To get an idea of what kind of people run the SPLC, and what kind of bilge they produce, here’s just one example of a group designated a hate group by the SPLC.

Moms for Liberty describes itself as “fighting for the survival of America by unifying, educating and empowering parents to defend their parental rights at all levels of government.” But, according to the SPLC, Moms for Liberty is a hate group engaging in three types of hate: anti-government hate, anti-inclusion hate, and anti-LGBTQ+ hate—“anti-government hate” for opposing mask mandates, “anti-inclusion hate” for opposing the teaching of CRT, and “anti-LGBTQ+ hate” for opposing sexually explicit reading material in public school libraries. All three of those positions are shared by many tens of millions of mainstream Americans—perhaps large majorities of Americans.

Moms for Liberty encourages local civic participation through chapters. “The core responsibility of our chapters,” it says on their website, “is to act as a watchdog over their local school boards.” In other words, Moms for Liberty is a group of Americans participating locally in their democracy. These are the people the SPLC attacks and demonizes with the poisonous label of “hate” (and every new chapter of Moms for Liberty counts as another “hate group” on the SPLC’s stupid “hate map”).

Hate group

When it comes to political speech, the “fighting hate” racket produces speech of the lowest kind and the SPLC is the worst of the worst. The fact that Wikipedia uses the SPLC as an authority on anything except grifting drags Wikipedia’s credibility down to the SPLC’s subterranean level. So, when I encounter political bias from Wikipedia, I am automatically disposed in favor of the target of that bias.

It was in that frame of mind that I visited the OAN website and watched three segments on the topic of the current Israeli/Palestinian turmoil. I was looking for an alternative take on the events in Israel, something that would explain Wikipedia’s bias against OAN. I was disappointed, however. All three segments were in an interview format and all three guests were hard-core Zionist Jews and/or Israelis. In other words, OAN was in lockstep with the rest of the media in its coverage of the conflict.

In the third of the three OAN videos I watched, the guest was a guy named Dov Hikind, a Jew who is so Deuteronomy he makes Ben Shapiro look like Ron Unz. Hikind was a follower of Rabbi Meir Kahane, a genocidal Zionist extremist who taught that blacks and Arabs are subhuman animals and the rest of us are fit only to serve Jews. That’s what Kahane literally taught. Then he died and Hikind went on to become a New York State Assemblyman with a regular column in the nation’s largest Jewish publication, The Forward.

In 2000, I was on the receiving end of some Dov Hikind hatred in one his columns. A nonprofit group I had founded to advocate for an immigration time-out had put up the billboard pictured below at the foot of the Brooklyn Bridge. Despite our scrupulously non-racial advocacy, Hikind, the Kahanist, inveighed against “the putrid stench of Nelsen’s racism.”

This billboard had Dov Hikind seeing red.

Just as the SPLC labels Moms for Liberty a “hate group,” Hikind labeled me a “racist.” In neither case is it justified, but the accuracy of the label is immaterial to enemies like Dov Hikind and the SPLC. Indeed, Hikind, the Kahanist, founded Americans Against Antisemitism in 2019 to “bring together a broad cross-section of Americans who have zero tolerance for hatred of any sort,” but in the OAN interview, he oozes hatred. For that matter, so does the OAN interviewer, Dana Alexa.

OAN’s Dana Alexa semi-coherently begins the segment, “We continue to monitor the war on Israel as Hamas has an unyeilding effort to do what they have called for years, terminate the Jews.” After noting the Israeli death toll, she says 300,000 Israeli soldiers “are standing strong and ready as they prepare their ground operation” to rescue hostages and, she says, making a subtle knife-slitting-throat gesture, “completely eliminate Hamas.” The events in Israel have left her “speechless,” she says implausibly. She’s also personally “sick to her stomach” and she’s “never felt more devastated for her brothers and sisters in Israel, right now, and all our Jewish family.” Given what you know about the IDF, she finally asks Hikind, “how are they going to take out Hamas?”

“Israel will do what needs to be done,” Hikind replies from Jerusalem, what they should have done a long time ago so we wouldn’t have a situation like we just did— “literally the massacre of men, women, and children.” Then channeling his old mentor, Rabbi Kahane, he continues, “I mean, you talk about barbarism, oh my God, it is just beyond comprehension, beyond belief, that so-called human beings can behave the way they did. They’re not human. It’s that simple.”

Alexa notes Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is traveling in the area to let Israelis know “we” have their back (Blinken told Israelis he was there as US Secretary of State and a Jew, so the “we” part there is unclear). “Are you hopeful,” she asks Hikind, “that the Secretary is going to get that message across? That the US is not going to tolerate terrorism in Israel?”

Hikind replies that, while he has no use for the Biden Administration, on Israel, they are great. Israelis are grateful, he says. “And I hope that doesn’t change. I hope it remains exactly what it is. And that is, Hamas must be destroyed.”

The moment when the word “destroyed” leaves evil, genocidal, hate-filled Dov Hikind’s lips. Imagine you are a writer or professor or newspaper publisher in 1922 Russia. The Bolshevik Red Terror has reached cruising altitude—an execution rate of more than 3,000 Russian Christians per day. Month after month, year after year, every day in Russia is 9-11. Imagine you’ve been arrested for political crimes and taken to the local CheKa, the secret political police in charge of administering the Red Terror. Imagine this man, Dov Hikind, is your interrogator (and CheKa interrogators were overwhelmingly Jewish). He has absolute power over you. If he wants to, he can torture you for as long and in any way he pleases. He can execute you at his whim. Maybe he will make a record of what he decides to do to you, or maybe not. It doesn’t matter. He can do anything he wants with complete impunity, and no will ever know what happened to you. Look at that face and imagine asking for mercy.

Dana Alexa goes on to play a bit where MSNBC’s “Andreas” Mitchell asks an Israeli woman what she thinks of the “attacks on Gaza,” a question that “disgusts” Alexa and made her stomach churn again. “Maybe we should show her some more pictures of these animals burning babies alive,” snarls Alexa.

Somewhere in America some teenagers are forming a new garage band called Burning Babies Alive.

Dov Hikind agreed and said the question made him so angry he wanted to “punch her in the face.”⁴

Alexa asked Hikind why Palestinians don’t reject Hamas. “Look,” explained the guy who was following a rabbi way back in the 1980s who taught that Arabs and blacks are literally animals, “when you’ve listened to the hate…for so many years, you develop a hatred…you will not see the Jewish people as human beings.”

While Hikind is laughably lacking in self-awareness, he happens to be right about the result of listening to hate for so many years. He is a prime example. The mitzvah—the commandment—to hate is applied to non-Judaics so universally in Deuteronomy that the authors of that book found it easier to list those whom Jehovah didn’t command the Judahites to hate. Edomites and Egyptians are out of the crosshairs.⁵ And that’s it. Lucky them. For everybody else in the world, Jehovan hatred limits the options to enslavement or extermination.

Over and over, Deuteronomy commands the Jews to destroy—and not only non-Jews, but any Jew who may “seek after other gods.” If the Jews of a certain city fall away from Jehovah’s destroyer cult, the whole city, including the Jews, must be destroyed (as opposed to the city’s previous destiny of having only its gentiles enslaved or exterminated). Destroy without mercy,⁶ says Deuteronomy. Show no pity.⁷

Deuteronomy is arguably the most hateful document ever written and Jews have been listening to Deuteronomy’s theology of racial hatred for 2,664 years, now. It shows. The hatred emanating from both Alexa and Hikind during the OAN interview is palpable.

In a recent exchange I had with a commenter here, we discovered that, for both of us, a watershed in our political maturation was reading Ron Unz’ 2018 American Pravda article, “Oddities of the Jewish Religion,” in which he writes:

Obviously the Talmud is hardly regular reading among ordinary Jews these days, and I would suspect that except for the strongly Orthodox and perhaps most rabbis, barely a sliver are aware of its highly controversial teachings. But it is important to keep in mind that until just a few generations ago, almost all European Jews were deeply Orthodox, and even today I would guess that the overwhelming majority of Jewish adults had Orthodox grand-parents. Highly distinctive cultural patterns and social attitudes can easily seep into a considerably wider population, especially one that remains ignorant of the origin of those sentiments, a condition enhancing their unrecognized influence. A religion based upon the principal of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” may be expected to have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.

So, what, then, is OAN? Is it owned by Zionists? The IDF? No. A brief dip into the comments section of a few OAN pieces shows that OAN is strongly evangelical Christian with, apparently, an evangelical Christian ownership.

Zionism is utterly antithetical to the Christian doctrine of “Love they neighbor,” but the hatred expressed for the “animals” in Palestine by the Christians in the comments sections on OAN differs not at all with the hatred expressed by Dov Hikind and Dana Alexa. And while they all—Christian and Jew—desire the slaughter of the Palestinians, renamed “Hamas” for the event, only the Jews are being faithful to the tenets of their religion. The Christian Zionists are apostates. They have embraced the anti-Christian.

On Israel, instead of offering an alternative political view—a gentile view, a Christian view, or even an American view, OAN is in lock step with Jonathan Greenblatt, Chuck Schumer, and the New York Times. On every other major issue, Chuck Schumer, The New York Times, the SPLC and the rest will be on the opposite side of the fence from OAN. They are the recognized enemies of conservative Christians. But, for the evangelical Christian, they all somehow transform into righteous allies when it comes to Israel. It boggles the mind.

It's like that one scene in that one movie where the big massive door is slowly sliding shut and these guys are racing to get through the door before it shuts them in forever. We’re those guys; the Internet opened up that door for us, and as more and more of us wake up and begin frantically spreading crucial information—information 99 percent of us would never have come across before the Internet—the dark forces of the evil Chosen Ones are straining all their powers on getting that door closed back up again before we get through it. We're racing, racing for the narrowing opening, but our chances of squeaking through are severely reduced by our stricken companion, Christianz I. O'Nists. He has nearly succumbed to the Chosen Ones' poisonous vapors, which work by making their victims consciously impervious to new information that isn’t Holy Writ. He is still breathing, so we can't just leave him, but he is dead weight and seriously compromising the chances of escape for all of us because of the extra energy we have to spend dragging him along.

Come on, Christianz; wake up, brother. In the Holy Land, it is the Palestinians—the Semites—who are the victims. They are victims of a bloody imposter regime. The Chosen Ones’ vapors have you confused. Rip that racist, hate-filled, genocidal Torah off your Bibles and come back to Christianity. Love your neighbor, Christianz.

1. “Slate is an online magazine that covers current affairs, politics, and culture in the United States. It was created in 1996 by former New Republic editor Michael Kinsley, initially under the ownership of Microsoft as part of MSN.”

2. “The Cable News Network is a multinational news channel and website headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.”

3. Here’s how OAN describes itself: “OAN is a news channel that covers topics such as politics, business, tech, entertainment and sports from a conservative perspective.”

4. The Israeli woman Mitchell was interviewing for MSNBC, who was sitting in near silhouette, was also upset by the question. I used to tell my children to feel sorry for the Gaza children, she says, because they have it worse than you. But not anymore. She claims the Hamas terrorists trashed her apartment and then snatched up her children and ran back to Gaza with them, where they are now hostages. She, too, calls the terrorists “animals” and supports, not the “attacks” on Gaza, but the “defensive Israeli retaliation bombing” of Gaza. Bombing, where her children are being held hostage. To me, her story doesn’t pass the King Solomon motherhood test, so mark me down as skeptical on that one.

5. Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land. Deut 23:7

6. Deut. 7:2

7. Deut. 7:16