The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Harvard
On the remarkable prognosticatory powers of some unnamed 19th Century French-speaking antisemitic Jesuit forger working for the Tsar's Okhrana who was just trying to trick everyone into hating Jews
In Protocol #16 of the famous 19th Century Russian forgery, Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the plan of the ruling sect for the universities is laid out:
In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism1—the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction. Their officials and professors will be prepared for their business by detailed secret programs of action from which they will not with immunity diverge not by one iota. They will be appointed with especial precaution, and will be so placed as to be wholly dependent upon the Government.
Classicism, as also any form of study of ancient history, in which there are more bad than good examples, we shall replace with the study of the program of the future.
The Protocols first surfaced around the turn of the 20th Century. Here’s what Harvard was offering its students in the school year 1899-1900 in the way of Greek Classicism:
Homer (Iliad and Odyssey, selections)
Greek Prose Composition — Introduction to Athenian Oratory and Philosophy. — Greek Poetry from Homer to Euripides. — Lectures and reading. — Lysias; Plato (Apology, Crito, and Euthyphro) ; Elegiac, Iambic, and Lyric Poets (selections); Euripides (Medea, and readings from other plays).
Greek Prose Composition (second course). — Goodwin’s Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. The Period of Athenian Supremacy. —Herodotus (Book VIII). — Aeschylus (Persians).:-— Plutarch (Themistocles, or Cimon). — Thucydides (Book I, 87-117, or the Funeral Oration in Book II). — Plutarch (Pericles). — Sophocles (Antigone). — Lectures. — Reading at sight. Aristophanes (Birds).— Aeschylus (Prometheus Bound).— Thucydides (Books VI and VII). — Sophocles (Oedipus Tyrannus).
Greek Prose Composition (third course). —'Translation and original composition (narrative and descriptive). Demosthenes (On the Crown, with parts of the Oration on the Embassy). — Aeschines (Against Ctesiphon).— Aeschylus (Seven against Thebes).— Sophocles (Antigone).— Aristophanes (Frogs).
Greek Prose Composition (fourth course). — Written composition in the style of Demosthenes and of Plato, with studies of classical models. — Translation of selections of standard English (rhetorical and philosophical).
Plato. — Rapid reading and interpretation of selected Dialogues.
Plato (Republic.) — Aristotle (Ethics, Books I-IV and X).
Theocritus, Bion, and Moschus.
The Life of the Ancient Athenians, described and illustrated by the aid of the Literature and of the Monuments. — Lectures. — Required reading.—'Two short theses.
The History of the Greek Drama. — Lectures on the dramatic Art and Literature of the Greeks, with reading and study of the extant plays of the Greek dramatists.
Political History of Greece
Introductory Course in the Text-Criticism and Interpretation of Classical Authors
Greek Elegiac, Iambic, and Lyric Poetry
Pindar (Olympian and Pythian Odes) with some poems of Bacchylides.
Aeschylus. — The Plays and Fragments.
Sophocles. —The Plays and Fragments.
Thucydides
Aristotle (Politics and parts of the Constitution of Athens)
Literary Criticism in Antiquity. — Aristotle (Art of Poetry). — Longinus (On the Sublime). — Horace (Art of Poetry). — Quintilian (Book X). — Lectures and studies.
The Acts of the Apostles.
Greek Grammar (Sounds and Inflections). — Study of Dialectic Inscriptions.
The Legal Antiquities of Athens and the Judicial Process of the Athenian Courts.
Demosthenes.
History of Greek Literature.
Introduction to Greek Epigraphy and Palaeography
Religion and Worship of the Greeks.
Greek Mythology.
The Private Life of the Greeks (advanced course)
The Literary and Epigraphic Sources for the History of Greek Sculpture and Vase-painting
Painting in Ancient Greece
Disputed Questions in Athenian Topography2
And classical Latin studies were nearly as robust.
Now back to Protocol #16:
We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction…teachers will read…the philosophy of new theories not yet declared to the world. These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith…
So how accurately did the famous Russian forgery predict the future? One hundred and twenty-five years later…
Harvard course offerings in the Classics in the 2023-2024 academic year include:
Classical Antiquity and the Legacy of Slavery at Harvard — This course investigates the historical ties between the study of Classical antiquity at Harvard and slavery, and those ties' complex and enduring legacies. Areas of examination include the relationship between the ideologies of slavery in the ancient and modern worlds, the teaching of ancient languages and literatures and the historical development of the institutions of slavery, the evolving history and politics of classical and Judeo-Christian antiquity…
Garbage.
In another 2023-2024 Classics course:
…We will read and analyze selected speeches by Lysias, Demosthenes, Aeschines (extracts), and Apollodorus in Greek, with particular attention to the ways in which these speeches represent and negotiate categories of identity. Our primary focus will be the translation and interpretation of Athenian lawcourt speeches, informed by scholarship on Athenian rhetoric and law, citizenship in Ancient Athens, gender and sexuality in ancient Greece, and pertinent modern works of gender theory and queer theory.
Garbage.
In another 2023-2024 Classics course:
In this course, we will read Euripides' Bacchae, a magnificent and devastating tragedy about the consequences of denying Dionysus. Through close analysis of both the Greek text and other representations of this famously elusive god in ancient Greek theater and art, we will try to understand the various forms of transgression and performance within this play. We will also explore Dionysus' manifestations in 20th- and 21st-century American culture and consider why Bacchae has been the basis of so many explorations of gender and sexuality across different media.
Garbage.
And so on…
Harvard should hire me to teach a course on The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion…!
A few years ago, I came across a website for a school somewhere in South Dakota. Its home page announced a new major being offered that year: CEO. Give them credit for dispensing with the fluffery. They could do themselves one better by just offering a major in Rich or, even more pointedly, Status.
How is Harvard any different? Unlike the students who filled the seats at Harvard in 1899-1900, who entered a conversation with the greatest minds from 2,500 years of Western Civilization and graduated equipped to live their lives as educated human beings, today’s Harvard graduates are courtiers in training—“obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet.”3
It is exactly as The Protocols foretold. Our universities are fully Judaized, with all that that entails.
By “collectivism,” The Protocols appear to mean racial solidarity among whites.
Harvard course offerings in the 1899-1900 school year also included 25 courses in French language and literature, 34 courses in German language and literature, and 42 courses in English language and English/American literature.
Protocol #16
As always, the controversy over the authenticity of the Protocols raises many serious questions.
The accepted definition of forgery is:
The action of forging or producing a copy of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art.
If the Protocols is a forgery the question arises what original did it copy?
If all of its chapters describing a plan to achieve Judaic supremacy are just a bunch of lies, how come they have proven to be correct over time to the point of making it look like a prophecy?
Prophecies, however, are notoriously ambiguous and even lending themselves to contradictory interpretations (like the Delphi oracle), whereas the exhaustive, minutious details in the Protocols leave no room for ambiguity: the plan for the takeover of the world by Jewish supremacists is spelled out in intent as well as in the carefully laid out means to be used to realize it.
If a so-called tsarist anti-semite wrote the Protocols in order to make the gentiles hate the Jews, why did the “Elders of Zion” embrace this anti-semitic screed so completely BY DEED and set about to fulfill it?
Were they not afraid that knowledge of its existence would make the Gentiles hate them? Or were they counting on impunity on the basis of the systematic mental castration of the Gentiles, also described in the Protocols, that would turn them into “obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet,” sheep that trust the wolves?
The Jewish hatred of the White nations is a religious hatred (much more visceral than their hatred of Islam) but their hatred of the Greco-Roman roots of those nations’ culture and ethos is racial hatred — much more visceral than their hatred of other races.
Their hatred of White Christian nations is FUNCIAR, whereas their hatred of Islamic nations is SITUATIONAL.
The former represent a permanent fundamental danger to them (ideologically and spiritually and as a civilization )whereas the latter only happen to be in the way of their expansions and depredations but can also be used as cat’s paws if cleverly instrumentalized to hate the WHITES (remind them of colonialism, slavery, etc).
The tribe that never developed a civilization of its own must negate and uproot the White Western civilization by all means, including destroying its legacy, its inheritance and its artifacts.
Given the abysmal level of education in the US it is not much of surprise that the Protocols operatives have succeeded so well. I was more surprised by France sinking even lower, with Paris not so long ago still considered “the City of Light” `and with the French television a few decades ago still featuring talk shows debating philosophical ideas with huge ratings — the kind of TV programs that in the US would not have lasted a week in the competition with football and “action movies.”
Yet, now in France, the land that gave the world Pascal, Voltaire, Diderot, Descartes, among others, the repugnant mediocrity engaged in propaganda for Jewish wars— Bernard-Henri Levy — is considered the most prominent French philosopher. Long before Shabbos shiksa Pelosi made a statement to the effect that without Jews the US would be nothing, French shabbos Goy PM of Spanish origin Manuel Valls said that if 500,00 Spaniards left France it would make no difference but "if 500,00 Jews left, France would no longer be France."
I don't know what could wake up the American people.
By now they should at least be familiar with the basic list of huge Jewish lies about the real perpetrators/leaders of the Bolshevik Revolution, the Spanish Civil War, the Holocaust™, USS Liberty, 9/11, The Kennedy clan assassinations, the US Jewish Wars. Yet they seem to shrug them off.
By now they should know that the Fed Res Bank is not federal but “independent,” not “reserve” because nobody, not even the Congress, is allowed audit it and see if its cupboards only contain IOU’s, and not a bank since it has only one client: the US government— whom it charges interest for “lending” it the money it prints at will.
By now they should be curious enough to ask to whom does the US owe those trillions of dollars? Name the banks! Maybe they can be persuaded to declare a jubilee year and wipe out that debt in recognition of the loot they have amassed so far.
Nevertheless if a TV channel announced a program with the title “The US Sovereign Debt “ to run in the same time slot as one on another channel focusing on the Kardashians, or —even better— “Is Harvey Weinstein a sexual predator?”, then the ratings for the program on the US debt would be crushed into nothing in competition.
I am sorry to be so pessimistic but the tremendous work done by Craig and a few other intelligent, persuasive and courageous sowers seems to be like precious seeds falling on mostly fallow soil.
The plants that grow from them should be a dense forest by now.
I don't recommend my (perhaps somewhat selfish) pessimist to anyone. I attribute it to being old and despairing to see the dawn in the time I have left.
In fact I recommend engagement and support of the "sowers” because the evil will not have a final victory until there is no more resistance.
The awareness of the noxious behavior of Jews and the danger this tribe poses to all non-Jews, in particular to White Christian nations, is usually commensurate with knowledge of their record throughout history. Regular readers of Odysseus Unsheathed have been helped to become acquainted with the tribe’s CV.
The recent “coming out” of Jews over the past two years in Gaza has liberated murderous psychopaths tired of being imprisoned in the false bodies of “people like other people.” They have been celebrating blood-drenched judaic pride parades over the bodies of Palestinians, men, women and children (many thousands of children) and posting them on the internet for all to see. According to their own polls, they are 95% of the entire population of Jews in Israel.
As a result, many people previously unaware of the Jews' track record in history have been suddenly jolted into what felt like obligatory, well, “anti-semitism.”
Many of them feel uncomfortable with this realization, having been taught to avoid “painting with a wide brush,” “making generalizations,” so they take refuge in qualifiers like: “it is not all Jews, it is only ”organized Jewry, because the ‘little Jews’ `are innocent,” or “These are not really Jews, they are Khazars, a Turkic tribe,” or “Only talmudists are bad, because the real Jews are Torah Jews and they are good,” etc, etc. (Every time someone mentions the Torah Jews ask them if they are aware of the teachings of Deuteronomy.)
I came across a polemicist (link below) who abjures all qualifiers and has a lot to say about the “little Jews.” You may not agree with all he has to say but the fact that he can still publish his trenchantly “anti-semitic” views freely means that for now the US is still not like Germany. An undeniable silver lining.
https://ourstruggle.pub/p/jewish-subversion?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2966488&post_id=162424693&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1gmd7y&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email