I understand that in Clown World the Constitution is irrelevant, but how the hell could this Florida law be constitutional? It's a blatant violation of the 1st Amendment by the government of Florida.
The first law adopts the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism (and trains cops to recognize it), but applied it only to public schools in Florida, and it also makes "religion" a protected class, like race. The second law, moving the IHRA definition out of the schools and into the general political arena, says that if a member of a protected class claims to feel threatened by "hate speech" you published (say, by handing them a flyer), you can be arrested and charged with a third degree felony and, with hate crime enhancements, receive a ten-year prison term. Sneaky, huh? Drip...drip...drip... In Israel, Gov. DeSantis described the laws as, together, "protecting religious liberty."
Its helpful to consider Judaism as a game theory. Without any thoughtful metaphysics or afterlife, global domination as a historical game is the outcome their theorizing ultimately seeks to achieve.
The Jewish model operates very much on a system of Chess, however, and their children are becoming bound by hubris and the myriad afflictions of laziness.
The Chinese play a different game. A superior game. Its called Go.
Yes, the FL laws as described are laughably unconstitutional, and if someone is charged under them and has the money to bring it to the present SCOTUS, they should be struck down. But plaintiffs won't have any help from the ACLU: if they can't pay the price of a trophy house, a plaintiff will need pro bono representation by a conservative law firm.
What we need in this country is something like a branch of Poland's Confederation party, which I believe polls as high as 17% and is explicitly genuinely nationalistic and thus also explicitly antisemitic.
“The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC…….”
That was after the 60 year Babylonian exile, 598 BC. TO 538/539 BC.
“………the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites)….”
Petty, small, insignificant.
Only 25% of the Kingdom of Judah were taken to Babylon, the royalty, nobles and professionals (and clergy?).
When did this happen: “First, the twelve tribes split into the Northern and Southern Kingdoms of Israel and Judah respectively, and then the two kingdoms went to war against each other. Later, the Northern Kingdom (Israel) went into exile under the Assyrians, never to return. Of the glory of ancient Israel, only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin remained.”
It was not dated but appears to have happened prior to the Babylonian exile? So, what happened to the tribe of Israel?
“…. the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC they produced Deuteronomy ……….”
That is 22 years prior to the Babylonian exile, 598 BC? So, what is the significance of the 458 BC date? I am confused.
Most scholars agree that much of the Old Testament canon was compiled, redacted, and edited during the Babylonian exile and soon after during the later Second Temple Period.
My point in all of this is that it appears that Judah was demographically shrinking until the integration of the Kharzas, who are NOT Sematic. DNA wise I think one would be hard pressed to find a lot of Sematic Jews. I once read that the Palestinians, DNA wise, are actually the ancient Israelites. Over the millennia they converted to Islam (easy to do since there are a lot of similarities). Bringing the scope into focus, it is the Khazarian Jews that carried out the Russian revolution?
These laws were Null and Void before the ink dried. In the 2017 case Matal v. Tam, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the First Amendment protects free speech, including speech that some may consider hate speech, and that the government cannot discriminate against speech based on the speaker's viewpoint. In essence, in American jurisprudence there can no recognition of 'hate speech', only free speech. You have no right, nor any expectation to 'not be offended'. Done... Debunked! As an anti-White, Anti-American jewish trope.
And we are supposed to believe the Christian God is the same as the Jewish god ? I am more inclined to believe that the Jew god is Lucifer or Satan and Jesus said as much..And most of Christianity has been deceived and decimated by the phony Luciferian Judaism but that was the whole point all along I guess according to the Luciferian Jews humanity are animals to be sacrificed to their Satan/god.No I don’t think so
I recently bought Reed’s book Controversy of Zion, and I find that he, as many others do, don’t give the book a complete survey, not take into account the rest of the Bible in putting Deuteronomy in context. For instance, where is the discussion of the definitive boundaries that are outlined for conquest? Where is the discussion of the people to be conquered and exterminated, especially noting the candid language of giants - a human genetic anomaly - and in context as indicated in Genesis 6:4? Or of “The synagogue of Satan”, as noted by John’s Revelation by Jesus? Or of Peter’s pivotal comment, “for this reason was the Son of God manifested into the world; to destroy the works of the devil”.
Context is everything, and Christianity is more than its morals and dogma, to borrow the phrase from Pike. It is about a spiritual drama, played out on the playing field of humanity. To not see and account for these things, is to lose the forest for the trees.
I might add a reading of Matt 13, where Jesus is teaching in parables, and we get leaven in loaves, the mustard seed, and Tares among wheat. All 3 have exoteric and esoteric meanings. He who has ears to hear…
But it’s only the Tares among wheat that the disciples ask for clarification on, which is a polite way to say they said, “what did you just say?!?!?”, to Jesus. And Jesus clearly spells out that a second race lives among us, that looks like us, breeds like us, eats like us, poops in the morning like us, but is not us.
Let that sink in and then go revisit The Synagogue of Satan, and you might get a little more context on “those who call themselves Jews”.
I am sure the author's intentions are noble, but the lack of true understanding of Judaism - Talmud, Jew - modern word lacks clarity that only obfuscates, [not mentioned above, but important Judean], Judahite, Gentile - correctly refers to the 12 tribes of Jacob as "nation" not as non-Jews, and [not mentioned above, but important Israelite].
I understand where you are coming from, but because of the lack of "true" understanding, the above makes no sense. I hyphenated the word "true", because the lies run deep, and they are very hard to untangle being they go counter to doctrines of today.
Thanks for the comment. You are right, I do not know the Talmud. But I do know Deuteronomy, which is inexplicably given the same authority as the New Testament by Christians--probably the reason for the remarkable ability among some fundamentalist Christians to hold two opposing beliefs simultaneously.
I know that being "dispersed among the nations" is depicted in Deuteronomy as a punishment of the Jews by Jehovah for not keeping the "statutes and judgments" of the Law. And if living amongst us is a punishment, then, of course, the Jews must be suffering persecution, or it wouldn't be punishment. That persecution has come to be known as "anti-Semitism," a special kind of bigotry only Jews can feel, and always present (and rising!) whether there is persecution or not.
Perhaps you'll say the Talmud has superseded Deuteronomy, and maybe it has. But Deuteronomy retains its force, otherwise Biden wouldn't be rolling out a national effort right now to "fight anti-Semitism," a foe as imaginary as the foe Caligula conquered on the beach in northern France.
Any gentile who believes anti-Semitism is a real thing is a dupe. But any Jew who believes there is such a thing is playing the precise role laid out for him in Deuteronomy nearly three thousand years ago.
By "hyphenated" you mean in quotation marks, I assume. I did not detect any "lack of clarity" in what I consider a superb analysis of the Second Law as the religious and ideologic underpinning of the Jewish imperative "Destroy!" which Jones called "the Jewish revolutionary spirit."
I understand that in Clown World the Constitution is irrelevant, but how the hell could this Florida law be constitutional? It's a blatant violation of the 1st Amendment by the government of Florida.
The first law adopts the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism (and trains cops to recognize it), but applied it only to public schools in Florida, and it also makes "religion" a protected class, like race. The second law, moving the IHRA definition out of the schools and into the general political arena, says that if a member of a protected class claims to feel threatened by "hate speech" you published (say, by handing them a flyer), you can be arrested and charged with a third degree felony and, with hate crime enhancements, receive a ten-year prison term. Sneaky, huh? Drip...drip...drip... In Israel, Gov. DeSantis described the laws as, together, "protecting religious liberty."
Its helpful to consider Judaism as a game theory. Without any thoughtful metaphysics or afterlife, global domination as a historical game is the outcome their theorizing ultimately seeks to achieve.
The Jewish model operates very much on a system of Chess, however, and their children are becoming bound by hubris and the myriad afflictions of laziness.
The Chinese play a different game. A superior game. Its called Go.
Yes, the FL laws as described are laughably unconstitutional, and if someone is charged under them and has the money to bring it to the present SCOTUS, they should be struck down. But plaintiffs won't have any help from the ACLU: if they can't pay the price of a trophy house, a plaintiff will need pro bono representation by a conservative law firm.
What we need in this country is something like a branch of Poland's Confederation party, which I believe polls as high as 17% and is explicitly genuinely nationalistic and thus also explicitly antisemitic.
“The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC…….”
That was after the 60 year Babylonian exile, 598 BC. TO 538/539 BC.
“………the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites)….”
Petty, small, insignificant.
Only 25% of the Kingdom of Judah were taken to Babylon, the royalty, nobles and professionals (and clergy?).
When did this happen: “First, the twelve tribes split into the Northern and Southern Kingdoms of Israel and Judah respectively, and then the two kingdoms went to war against each other. Later, the Northern Kingdom (Israel) went into exile under the Assyrians, never to return. Of the glory of ancient Israel, only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin remained.”
It was not dated but appears to have happened prior to the Babylonian exile? So, what happened to the tribe of Israel?
“…. the Levites in Judah began to compile the written Law. In 621 BC they produced Deuteronomy ……….”
That is 22 years prior to the Babylonian exile, 598 BC? So, what is the significance of the 458 BC date? I am confused.
Most scholars agree that much of the Old Testament canon was compiled, redacted, and edited during the Babylonian exile and soon after during the later Second Temple Period.
My point in all of this is that it appears that Judah was demographically shrinking until the integration of the Kharzas, who are NOT Sematic. DNA wise I think one would be hard pressed to find a lot of Sematic Jews. I once read that the Palestinians, DNA wise, are actually the ancient Israelites. Over the millennia they converted to Islam (easy to do since there are a lot of similarities). Bringing the scope into focus, it is the Khazarian Jews that carried out the Russian revolution?
https://thejews.substack.com/p/my-awakening-to-the-jewish-question
These laws were Null and Void before the ink dried. In the 2017 case Matal v. Tam, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the First Amendment protects free speech, including speech that some may consider hate speech, and that the government cannot discriminate against speech based on the speaker's viewpoint. In essence, in American jurisprudence there can no recognition of 'hate speech', only free speech. You have no right, nor any expectation to 'not be offended'. Done... Debunked! As an anti-White, Anti-American jewish trope.
And we are supposed to believe the Christian God is the same as the Jewish god ? I am more inclined to believe that the Jew god is Lucifer or Satan and Jesus said as much..And most of Christianity has been deceived and decimated by the phony Luciferian Judaism but that was the whole point all along I guess according to the Luciferian Jews humanity are animals to be sacrificed to their Satan/god.No I don’t think so
I recently bought Reed’s book Controversy of Zion, and I find that he, as many others do, don’t give the book a complete survey, not take into account the rest of the Bible in putting Deuteronomy in context. For instance, where is the discussion of the definitive boundaries that are outlined for conquest? Where is the discussion of the people to be conquered and exterminated, especially noting the candid language of giants - a human genetic anomaly - and in context as indicated in Genesis 6:4? Or of “The synagogue of Satan”, as noted by John’s Revelation by Jesus? Or of Peter’s pivotal comment, “for this reason was the Son of God manifested into the world; to destroy the works of the devil”.
Context is everything, and Christianity is more than its morals and dogma, to borrow the phrase from Pike. It is about a spiritual drama, played out on the playing field of humanity. To not see and account for these things, is to lose the forest for the trees.
I might add a reading of Matt 13, where Jesus is teaching in parables, and we get leaven in loaves, the mustard seed, and Tares among wheat. All 3 have exoteric and esoteric meanings. He who has ears to hear…
But it’s only the Tares among wheat that the disciples ask for clarification on, which is a polite way to say they said, “what did you just say?!?!?”, to Jesus. And Jesus clearly spells out that a second race lives among us, that looks like us, breeds like us, eats like us, poops in the morning like us, but is not us.
Let that sink in and then go revisit The Synagogue of Satan, and you might get a little more context on “those who call themselves Jews”.
I am sure the author's intentions are noble, but the lack of true understanding of Judaism - Talmud, Jew - modern word lacks clarity that only obfuscates, [not mentioned above, but important Judean], Judahite, Gentile - correctly refers to the 12 tribes of Jacob as "nation" not as non-Jews, and [not mentioned above, but important Israelite].
I understand where you are coming from, but because of the lack of "true" understanding, the above makes no sense. I hyphenated the word "true", because the lies run deep, and they are very hard to untangle being they go counter to doctrines of today.
Thanks for the comment. You are right, I do not know the Talmud. But I do know Deuteronomy, which is inexplicably given the same authority as the New Testament by Christians--probably the reason for the remarkable ability among some fundamentalist Christians to hold two opposing beliefs simultaneously.
I know that being "dispersed among the nations" is depicted in Deuteronomy as a punishment of the Jews by Jehovah for not keeping the "statutes and judgments" of the Law. And if living amongst us is a punishment, then, of course, the Jews must be suffering persecution, or it wouldn't be punishment. That persecution has come to be known as "anti-Semitism," a special kind of bigotry only Jews can feel, and always present (and rising!) whether there is persecution or not.
Perhaps you'll say the Talmud has superseded Deuteronomy, and maybe it has. But Deuteronomy retains its force, otherwise Biden wouldn't be rolling out a national effort right now to "fight anti-Semitism," a foe as imaginary as the foe Caligula conquered on the beach in northern France.
Any gentile who believes anti-Semitism is a real thing is a dupe. But any Jew who believes there is such a thing is playing the precise role laid out for him in Deuteronomy nearly three thousand years ago.
By "hyphenated" you mean in quotation marks, I assume. I did not detect any "lack of clarity" in what I consider a superb analysis of the Second Law as the religious and ideologic underpinning of the Jewish imperative "Destroy!" which Jones called "the Jewish revolutionary spirit."