19th Century Russian Forgery Nails 21st Century US Congress

120-year-old claim that the people's representatives in a democracy would serve the Elders of Zion appears to have been perfectly accurate.

In the September 12, 1920 issue of The Dearborn Independent, then the nation’s second-largest circulation newspaper, the author of an article called, “Does This Explain Jewish Political Power,” quoted from the First Protocol of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion:

“The abstract conception of Liberty made it possible for us to convince the crowd that government is only the management for the owner of the country, the people, and that the steward can be changed like a pair of worn-out gloves. The possibility of changing the representatives of the people has placed them at our disposal and, as it were, has placed them in our power as creatures of our purposes.”

Whoa…what? The possibility of changing the representatives of the people has placed them…in our power as creatures of our purposes.

Now, as everyone knows, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a forgery, but that particular statement has legs. For having been composed by a forger in Tsarist Russia, it is, in fact, quite a remarkable statement concerning a social condition that was unknown in that time and place. But was this particular forger also a prophet? Is our Congress today merely a fetch boy for the Elders of Zion?

Let’s ask first-term Congressman Anthony D’Esposito, a Republican who represents a district in Nassau County, New York—the first county after Queens, New York City. D’Esposito is a former New York City cop—an occupation that tends to produce blunt speech at a much higher rate than the occupation of, say, politician does. Yesterday, D’Esposito introduced a resolution in Congress that just lays it out there blunt as hell: H.Res. 1107, “Expressing the sense of Congress that Israel must be in full support of any negotiation or agreement relating to the Israeli-Hamas conflict, including a two-state solution or similar long-term plan relating to Israel and Palestinians for it to move forward.” In other words, with due deference, the interests of a foreign country are given veto power over the interests of the American people. In what may or may not be relevant, D’Esposito’s top campaign donor, according to Open Secrets, is the Republican Jewish Coalition.

While his expression of it may be somewhat artless, D’Espositos’ subservience to Zion is no more pronounced than that of most of his colleagues in the US Congress. The current Congress, the 118th, is a little more than halfway through its term, which began in January, 2023. Every day that the 118th Congress has been in session, the country has been enduring a full scale, coordinated, intentional invasion of foreign, military-aged men across our southern border There is no situation that more legitimately demands the attention of the people’s representatives than a foreign invasion. How has our Congress responded to this obvious and undeniable invasion?

Earlier this month, the House passed H. Res. 1065 , which affirms the Biden Administration could solve the border crisis it created if it wanted to, but that it refuses to. It urges the administration to change its mind. This simple resolution passed by a vote of 226-193.

H. Res. 1065 came hard on the heels of another simple resolution, H.Res. 957, “[d]enouncing the Biden administration’s open-borders policies, condemning the national security and public safety crisis along the southwest border, and urging President Biden to end his administration’s open-borders policies.” On January 17th, it, too, passed the House. Pretty much the same simple resolution, pretty much the same vote (227-187), exactly the same impact: zero.

A “simple resolution” in Congress never goes before the other house for a vote and, therefore, does not have the force of law. It is merely a “sense of” the House or the Senate. Both the House and the Senate could pass a dozen of these a day and, unless one of them is voted on and passed in the other house, they mean squat. And still, even that was too much for nearly two hundred members of Congress, who voted against these simple resolutions in the House of Representatives—against simply asking the Biden Administration to please do its most fundamental job and resist the foreign invasion.

The indifference, let’s call it, to the viability of the United States as an actual country with an actual people sharing a common destiny is just as pronounced in the Senate. Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama introduced a simple resolution more than a year ago, February 9, 2023, S. Res. 45, “expressing the sense of the Senate that the current influx of migrants is causing a crisis at the southern border.” It languishes in committee. Also languishing in committee are two resolutions by Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas, S. Res. 362, a “resolution to express the sense of the Senate regarding the constitutional right of State Governors to repel the dangerous ongoing invasion across the United States southern border,” (and, again, as S. Res. 543). We couldn’t even get a vote. A simple resolution by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, however, S. Res. 166, “honoring the efforts of the Coast Guard for excellence in maritime border security” was brought to the floor, voted on, and passed.

All fizz and no pop.

There was, however, one vote—on an actual bill—having to do with preventing foreigners from entering the United States in favor of which the House rose in unified and enthusiastic support. H.R. 6679 was a bill “[t]o amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to aliens who carried out, participated in, planned, financed, supported, or otherwise facilitated the attacks against Israel.” It passed the House on January 31st on a 422-2 vote and was sent to the Senate.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a forgery, y’all.

It’s not our Congress.

When I was looking up information for this post, I started adding up all the appropriations that have gone to Israel so far in this Congress and it came to $305,635,010,000. Over $300 billion? Can that even be right?

Here’s my data.

The importance of Aaron Bushnell

The Council Grove skyline with a yard sign in front of it.

The yard signs have arrived and I’ve started mailing them out. I’m mailing them in the order they were requested. It is going to take a little time because, as I was surprised to discover, the cost for me to mail one of these is more than twice as much as the per unit price of one printed and delivered to me with a metal wire stand.

But the significance of Aaron Bushnell’s enormous sacrifice seems greater with each passing day. Here’s why:

There is no political solution to our political subjugation to the war monsters of Zion. There is no political solution to the ongoing and purposeful destruction of our country and civilization. There is no political solution to our barbarous foreign policy spreading death and suffering on behalf of Zion to millions around the world who never did anything to us. But that doesn’t mean there is no solution at all, just that we aren’t going to vote our way to one.

As I’ve argued before, the only human phenomenon that I’m aware of with the power potentially to break us free from the Zionist stranglehold is something like a religious revolution—something that fundamentally alters human life and the way we see it in the same way the scientific revolution did. What Aaron Bushnell did was a profoundly religious act motivated entirely by his moral clarity. There is great power there. It just has to be recognized and accepted.

I’ll have more to say about this next week.